Retzius-sparing robotic prostatectomy is associated with higher positive surgical margin rate in anterior tumors, but not in posterior tumors, compared to conventional anterior robotic prostatectomy

Prostate International - Tập 11 - Trang 13-19 - 2023
Masashi Oshima1, Satoshi Washino1, Yuhki Nakamura1, Tsuzumi Konishi1, Kimitoshi Saito1, Tomoaki Miyagawa1
1Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847, Amanuma-cho, Saitama-shi, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sung, 2021, Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries, CA Cancer J Clin, 71, 209, 10.3322/caac.21660 Mottet, 2017, EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent, Eur Urol, 71, 618, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 Deng, 2021, Functional and Oncological Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer With a Large Prostate Volume: A Retrospective Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Ups, Front Oncol, 11, 10.3389/fonc.2021.714680 Binder, 2002, Robot-assisted laparoscopy in urology. Radical prostatectomy and reconstructive retroperitoneal interventions, Urologe A, 41, 144, 10.1007/s00120-002-0178-2 Abbou, 2001, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot, J Urol, 165, 1964 Allan, 2016, Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review, Urol Int, 96, 373, 10.1159/000435861 Ficarra, 2012, Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 62, 405, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045 Schlomm, 2011, Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 60, 320, 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.040 Galfano, 2010, A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery, Eur Urol, 58, 457, 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008 Würnschimmel, 2021, Orphaned Side-effects After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is the Retzius-sparing Approach Superior to the Standard Approach or Are the Data Just Not Mature Enough?, Eur Urol Open Sci, 23, 34, 10.1016/j.euros.2020.11.007 Lee, 2020, Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients, J Urol, 203, 137 Kishore, 2021, The impact of transition from conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A retrospective multivariate analysis, Indian J Urol, 37, 140, 10.4103/iju.IJU_414_20 Deng, 2021, Transvesical Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis, Front Oncol, 11 Dalela, 2017, A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 72, 677, 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029 Lim, 2014, Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches, BJU Int, 114, 236, 10.1111/bju.12705 Asimakopoulos, 2019, Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates, Surg Endosc, 33, 2187, 10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z Fujimoto, 2019, Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer, Urol Int, 103, 125, 10.1159/000497280 Dindo, 2004, Classification of Surgical Complications. A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey, Ann Surg, 240, 205, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae Menon, 2018, Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches, J Urol, 199, 1210 Eden, 2017, Urinary continence four weeks following Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy: The UK experience, J Clin Urol, 11, 15 Xu, 2021, Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis, Front Surg, 8, 10.3389/fsurg.2021.738421 Egan, 2021, Eur Urol, 79, 839, 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010 Shin, 2021, The significance of the visible tumor on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer, Prostate Int, 9, 6, 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.06.001 Raheem, 2018, Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months, Int J Urol, 25, 1006, 10.1111/iju.13808 Chang, 2018, Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Associated with Less Bladder Neck Descent and Better Early Continence Outcome, Anticancer Res, 38, 345 Kowalczyk, 2020, Impact of Retzius-sparing Versus Standard Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Penile Shortening, Peyronie's Disease, and Inguinal Hernia Sequelae, Eur Urol Open Sci, 21, 17, 10.1016/j.euros.2020.09.004