Return to Play and Recurrent Instability After In-Season Anterior Shoulder Instability

American Journal of Sports Medicine - Tập 42 Số 12 - Trang 2842-2850 - 2014
Jonathan F. Dickens1,2, Brett D. Owens1,2, Kenneth L. Cameron1, Kelly G. Kilcoyne2,3, C. Dain Allred4, Steven J. Svoboda1,2, R Sullivan4, John M. Tokish5,2, Karen Y. Peck1, John-Paul H. Rue6
1John A. Feagin Jr Sports Medicine Fellowship, Keller Army Hospital, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA
2Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
3Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
4United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
5Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii USA
6Naval Heath Clinic Annapolis, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, USA

Tóm tắt

Background:

There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of in-season athletes with anterior shoulder instability, and limited data are available to guide return to play.

Purpose:

To examine the likelihood of return to sport and the recurrence of instability after an in-season anterior shoulder instability event based on the type of instability (subluxation vs dislocation). Additionally, injury factors and patient-reported outcome scores administered at the time of injury were evaluated to assess the predictability of eventual successful return to sport and time to return to sport during the competitive season.

Study Design:

Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

Over 2 academic years, 45 contact intercollegiate athletes were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter observational study to assess return to play after in-season anterior glenohumeral instability. Baseline data collection included shoulder injury characteristics and shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome scores at the time of injury. All athletes underwent an accelerated rehabilitation program without shoulder immobilization and were followed during their competitive season to assess the success of return to play and recurrent instability.

Results:

Thirty-three of 45 (73%) athletes returned to sport for either all or part of the season after a median 5 days lost from competition (interquartile range, 13). Twelve athletes (27%) successfully completed the season without recurrence. Twenty-one athletes (64%) returned to in-season play and had subsequent recurrent instability including 11 recurrent dislocations and 10 recurrent subluxations. Of the 33 athletes returning to in-season sport after an instability event, 67% (22/33) completed the season. Athletes with a subluxation were 5.3 times more likely (odds ratio [OR], 5.32; 95% CI, 1.00-28.07; P = .049) to return to sport during the same season when compared with those with dislocations. Logistic regression analysis suggests that the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P = .037) and Simple Shoulder Test (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .044) administered after the initial instability event are predictive of the ability to return to play. Time loss from sport after a shoulder instability event was most strongly and inversely correlated with the Simple Shoulder Test ( P = .007) at the time of initial injury.

Conclusion:

In the largest prospective study evaluating shoulder instability in in-season contact athletes, 27% of athletes returned to play and completed the season without subsequent instability. While the majority of athletes who return to sport complete the season, recurrent instability events are common regardless of whether the initial injury was a subluxation or dislocation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/036354659402200504

10.1177/036354658401200408

10.1177/03635465020300041801

10.1016/j.csm.2004.08.010

10.3810/psm.2010.10.1808

10.1177/0363546503262069

10.2106/JBJS.L.00252

10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.009

10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70294-5

DeBerardino TM, 1996, J South Orthop Assoc, 5, 263

10.1177/0363546511423005

10.2106/00004623-200001000-00004

10.2106/00004623-199706000-00008

10.1177/036354659602400204

10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90058-7

10.1007/BF01553526

10.2106/00004623-198365030-00008

10.1080/17453670710014617

10.2106/JBJS.G.00070

10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.004

10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.004

10.1177/03635465980260060501

10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.018

10.2106/00004623-200509000-00014

10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.052

10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90002-X

10.1177/0363546504268037

10.1177/0363546507302917

10.1016/j.jse.2005.05.011

10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00334.x

10.2106/00004623-199910000-00001

10.1177/0363546509334591

10.1177/0363546508328416

10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-518

10.1177/0363546506295179

10.2106/JBJS.I.00851

10.1177/036354659602400409

10.2106/JBJS.E.01327

10.2106/JBJS.F.00261

10.3109/17453670902930057

10.1177/036354658401200103

10.1177/036354659702500306

10.1177/0363546509350757

10.1016/0749-8063(89)90174-6

10.1177/03635465990270021701

10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.009