Retrieval operations in cued recall and recognition
Tóm tắt
The present study compared the effects of two classes of experimental manipulations on the recognition and cued recall of target words learned in the presence of list cues. One class of manipulations, learning instructions (repetition vs. meaningful rehearsal), had similar effects on recall and recognition, whereas the other, preexperimental association between target and cue words, had separable effects: Cue-to-target association affected only recall, while target-to-cue association affected only recognition performance. Recall and recognition were thus viewed as fundamentally similar processes, both of which require retrieval operations. Differences between the two were attributed to the differential abilities of the recall and recognition retrieval cues to access the original episodic event.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M.The effect of sentence elaboration on recognition memory. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1978.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 97–125.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. A propositional theory of recognition memory.Memory & Cognition, 1974,l, 406–412.
Bahrick, H. P. The ebb of retention.Psychological Review, 1965,72, 60–73.
Bartlett, F. C.Remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1932.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and VerbaI Behavior, 1972,11,671–684.
Flexsv.R. A. J., &Tulwng, E. Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 153–171.
Humphreys, M. S., &Galbraith, R. C. Forward and backward associations in cued recall: Predictions from the encoding specificity principle.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1,702–710.
Keppwl, G., &Strand, B. Z. Free-association responses to the primary responses and other responses selected from the Palermo-Jenkins norms. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.),Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Kintsch, W.Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. New York: Wiley, 1970.
Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., &Jacoby, L. L. Depth of processing in recognition and recall: Some aspects of a general memory system. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
Mazuryk, G. F., &Lockhart, R. S. Negative recency and levels of processing in free recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1974,28, 114–123.
Mccormack, P. D. Recognition memory: How complex a retrieval system?Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1972,26, 18–41.
Palermo, D. S., &Jenkins, J. J.Word association norms: Grade school through college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1964.
Postman, L., Jenkins, W. O., &Postman, D. L. An experimental comparison of active recall and recognition.American Journal of Psychology, 1948,61, 511–519.
Rabinowitz, J. C., Mandler, G., &Patterson, K. E. Determinants of recognition and recall: Accessibility and generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1977,106, 302–329.
Thonndike, E. L., &Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.
Tulving, E. Cue-dependent forgetting.American Scientist, 1974,62, 74–82.
Tulving, E. Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.
Tulwing, E., &Wiseman, S. Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the PsychonomicSociety, 1975,6, 79–82.
Underwood, B. J. Recognition memory for pairs of words as a function of associative context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,l, 404–412.
Watkins, M. J., &Tulwng, E. Episodic memory: When recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 5–29.