Rethinking mobility strategies for mega-sporting events: A global multiregional input-output-based hybrid life cycle sustainability assessment of alternative fuel bus technologies

Sustainable Production and Consumption - Tập 33 - Trang 767-787 - 2022
Noura Elagouz1, Nuri C. Onat1, Murat Kucukvar2, Burak Sen3, Adeeb A. Kutty2, Shigemi Kagawa4, Keisuke Nansai5, Doyoon Kim6
1Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
2Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
3SAU Center for Research & Development and Applied Research (SARGEM), Faculty of Engineering, Sakarya University, 54050, Sakarya, Turkey
4Department of International Economy and Business, Faculty of Economics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
5Material Cycles Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan
6Senior Sustainability Manager, Diriyah Gate Development Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Al-Buenain, 2021, The adoption of electric vehicles in Qatar can contribute to net carbon emission reduction but requires strong government incentives, Vehicles, 3, 618, 10.3390/vehicles3030037 Amari, 1999, Resource recovery from used rubber tires, Resour. Policy, 25, 179, 10.1016/S0301-4207(99)00025-2 Chen, 2019, Environmental benefits of secondary copper from primary copper based on life cycle assessment in China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 146, 35, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.020 Cooper, 2018, Social sustainability assessment of shale gas in the UK, 14, 1 Dahlgren, 2021, Sustainability assessment of public transport, part ii—applying a multi-criteria assessment method to compare different bus technologies, Sustainability, 13, 1273, 10.3390/su13031273 Dolles, 2010, Addressing ecology and sustainability in mega-sporting events: the 2006 football world cup in Germany, J. Manag. Organ., 16, 587, 10.5172/jmo.2010.16.4.587 Dong, 2022, Estimating the greenhouse gas emissions of cold chain infrastructure in China from 2021 to 2060, 31, 546 Egilmez, 2013, Sustainability assessment of U.S. Manufacturing sectors: an economic input output-based frontier approach, J. Clean. Prod., 53, 91, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.037 Ercan, 2015, A hybrid life cycle assessment of public transportation buses with alternative fuel options, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 20, 1213, 10.1007/s11367-015-0927-2 Feraldi, 2012, Comparative LCA of treatment options for US scrap tires: material recycling and tire-derived fuel combustion, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 613, 10.1007/s11367-012-0514-8 2021 Guinée, 2011, Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future†, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 90, 10.1021/es101316v Hao, 2017, Impact of recycling on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from electric vehicle production: the China 2025 case, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 122, 114, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.005 Hertwich, 2009, Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 6414, 10.1021/es803496a Hienuki, 2021, Environmental and energy life cycle analyses of passenger vehicle systems using fossil fuel-derived hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 46, 36569, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.135 Hoque, 2020, Life cycle sustainability assessment of alternative energy sources for the Western Australian transport sector, Sustainability, 12, 5565, 10.3390/su12145565 Huria, 2010, Systematic development of series-hybrid bus through modelling, 1 IEA, 2021 Kloepffer, 2008, Life cycle sustainability assessment of products, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13, 89, 10.1065/lca2008.02.376 Kouloumpis, 2018, Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment using fuzzy inference: a novel FELICITA model, 15, 25 Kucukvar, 2019, Assessing regional and global environmental footprints and value added of the largest food producers in the world, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 144, 187, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.048 Kucukvar, 2022, Environmental efficiency of electric vehicles in Europe under various electricity production mix scenarios, J. Clean. Prod., 335, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130291 Kucukvar, 2013, Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the U.S. Construction industry, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 958, 10.1007/s11367-013-0545-9 Kucukvar, 2016, Energy-climate-manufacturing nexus: new insights from the regional and global supply chains of manufacturing industries, Appl. Energy, 184, 889, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.068 Kucukvar, 2015, A global, scope-based carbon footprint modeling for effective carbon reduction policies: lessons from the turkish manufacturing, 1, 47 Kucukvar, 2014, Ranking the sustainability performance of pavements: an intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method, Autom. Constr., 40, 33, 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.12.009 Lenzen, 2000, Errors in conventional and input-output based life-cycle inventories, J. Ind. Ecol., 4, 127, 10.1162/10881980052541981 Lyng, 2019, Environmental life cycle assessment of biogas as a fuel for transport compared with alternative fuels, Energies, 12, 532, 10.3390/en12030532 Matthews, 2015 Miller, 2009 Müller, 2021, An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic games, Nat. Sustain., 4, 340, 10.1038/s41893-021-00696-5 Nansai, 2021, Consumption in the G20 nations causes particulate air pollution resulting in two million premature deaths annually, Nat. Commun., 12, 1, 10.1038/s41467-021-26348-y Nordelöf, 2019, Life cycle assessment of city buses powered by electricity, hydrogenated vegetable oil or diesel, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 75, 211, 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.019 OICA, 2021 Onat, 2022, How to compare sustainability impacts of alternative fuel vehicles?, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 102 Onat, 2021, How eco-efficient are electric vehicles across Europe? A regionalized life cycle assessment-based eco-efficiency analysis, Sustain. Dev., 29, 941, 10.1002/sd.2186 Onat, 2020, Carbon footprint of construction industry: a global review and supply chain analysis, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 124, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109783 Onat, 2022, A systematic review on sustainability assessment of electric vehicles: knowledge gaps and future perspectives, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 97, 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106867 Onat, 2019, How sustainable is electric mobility? A comprehensive sustainability assessment approach for the case of Qatar, Appl. Energy, 250, 461, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.076 Onat, 2017, Systems thinking for life cycle sustainability assessment: a review of recent developments, applications, and future perspectives, Sustainability, 9, 706, 10.3390/su9050706 Onat, 2016, Application of the TOPSIS and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies, 6, 12 Onat, 2014, Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, 1488, 10.1007/s11367-014-0753-y Pressley, 2015, Analysis of material recovery facilities for use in life-cycle assessment, Waste Manag., 35, 307, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.012 PSA, 2021 Rajaeifar, 2019, Emissions from urban bus fleets running on biodiesel blends under real-world operating conditions: implications for designing future case studies, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 111, 276, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.004 Rose, 1999, Determining end-of-life strategies as a part of product definition, 219 Sala, 2013, Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2), Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 1686, 10.1007/s11367-012-0509-5 Sen, 2020, Life cycle sustainability assessment of autonomous heavy-duty trucks, J. Ind. Ecol., 24, 149, 10.1111/jiec.12964 Sen, 2019, Material footprint of electric vehicles: a multiregional life cycle assessment, J. Clean. Prod., 209, 1033, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.309 Shahpar, 2018, Emission and life-cycle assessment of alternative-fuel buses: a case study of the Delaware Authority of Regional Transit, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 25, 290, 10.1080/13504509.2017.1390794 Stadler, 2018, EXIOBASE 3: developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input-output tables, J. Ind. Ecol., 22, 502, 10.1111/jiec.12715 Suh, 2005, Industrial ecology and input-output economics: an introduction, Econ. Syst. Res., 17, 349, 10.1080/09535310500283476 Suh, 2004, System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 657, 10.1021/es0263745 Bus, 2020 Tian, 2017, Environmental impact and economic assessment of secondary lead production: comparison of main spent lead-acid battery recycling processes in China, J. Clean. Prod., 144, 142, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.171 Economics, 2021 UITP, 2019 Valdivia, 2013, A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment - our contribution to Rio+20, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 1673, 10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1 Visentin, 2020, Life cycle sustainability assessment: a systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies, J. Clean. Prod., 270, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122509 Wood, 2013, Economic modelling and indicators in life cycle sustainability assessment, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 1710, 10.1007/s11367-012-0463-2 Xylia, 2017, Locating charging infrastructure for electric buses in Stockholm, Transp. Res. C: Emerg. Technol., 78, 183, 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.005 Yusof, 2021, Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact of electric buses, World Electr. Veh. J., 12, 31, 10.3390/wevj12010031 Zhao, 2016, Carbon and energy footprints of electric delivery trucks: a hybrid multi-regional input-output life cycle assessment, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 47, 195, 10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.014 Zhao, 2016, Life cycle based multi-criteria optimization for optimal allocation of commercial delivery truck fleet in the United States, 8, 18 Živanović, 2015, Natural gas buses in Serbia public transport: some operational experiences, FME Trans., 43, 89, 10.5937/fmet1502089z