Rethinking Assistive Technologies: Users, Environments, Digital Media, and App-Practices of Hearing
Tóm tắt
Against the backdrop of an aging world population increasingly affected by a diverse range of abilities and disabilities as well as the rise of ubiquitous computing and digital app cultures, this paper questions how mobile technologies mediate between heterogeneous environments and sensing beings. To approach the current technological manufacturing of the senses, two lines of thought are of importance: First, there is a need to critically reflect upon the concept of assistive technologies (AT) as artifacts providing tangible solutions for a specific disability. Second, the conventional distinction between user and environment requires a differentiated consideration. This contribution will first review James Gibson’s concept of “affordances” and modify this approach by introducing theories and methods of Science and Technology Studies (STS) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Then, we present two case studies where we explore the relations between recent “assistive” app technologies and human sensory perception. As hearing and seeing are key in this regard, we concentrate on two specific media technologies: ReSound LINX2, a hearing aid which allows for direct connect (via Bluetooth) with iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch, and Camassia, an IOS app for sonic wayfinding for blind people. We emphasize the significance of dis-/abling practices for manufacturing novel forms of hearing and seeing and drawing on sources like promotional materials by manufacturers, ads, or user testimonials and reviews. Our analysis is interested in the reciprocal relationships between users and their socio-technical and media environments. By and large, this contribution will provide crucial insights into the contemporary entanglement of algorithm-driven technologies, daily practices, and sensing subjects: the production of techno-sensory arrangements.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Miesenberger K, Kouroupetroglou G (2018) Computers helping people with special needs. Springer, Cham
Desmond D, Layton N, Bentley J, Boot FH, Borg J, Dhungana BM, Gallagher P, Gitlow L, Gowran RJ, Groce N, Mavrou K, Mackeogh T, McDonald R, Pettersson C, Scherer MJ (2018) Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 13(5):437–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1471169
Roulstone A (1998) Enabling technology: disabled people, work, and new technology. Open University Press, Buckingham
Hansson SO (2007) The ethics of enabling technology. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 16:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180107070296
Halvorsen R, Hvinden B (2018) Enabling persons with disabilities to be active citizens through the use of new technology. The DISCIT Project. Int Law Comput Technol 29(2):79–80
Jv U (2010) A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: with a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schillmeier M (2007) Dis/abling practices: rethinking disability. Hum Aff 17(2):195–208. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-007-0017-6
Mol A (2002) The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press, Durham and London
Lupton D (2019) The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: thinking with vital materialism. Soc Theory Health 17:125–139. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y
Schrock AR (2015) Communicative affordances of mobile media: portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. Int J Commun 9(18):1229–1246 https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3288/1363.
Ingold T (2011) Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge, London
Boess S, Kanis H (2008) Meaning in product use: a design perspective. In: Schifferstein H, Hekkert P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 305–332
Hörl E (2015) The technological condition. Parrhesia 22:1–15
Dokumaci A (2020) People as affordances. Curr Anthropol 61(S21):S97–S108
Hansen M (2015) Feed-forward: on the future of twenty-first-century media. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Dokumaci A (2016) Micro-activist affordances of disability: transformative potential of participation. In: Denecke M, Ganzert A, Otto I, Stock R (eds) ReClaiming participation: technology, mediation, collectivity. Transcript, Bielefeld, pp 67–84
Nierling, L et al (2018) Assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Part III: perspectives on assistive technologies http://wwweuroparleuropaeu/stoa/cms/cache/offonce/home/studies?page=2 Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Hunn, N (2016) The market for hearable devices 2016–2020. 2016. http://www.nickhunn.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/11/The-Market-for-Hearable-Devices-2016-2020.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Mills M (2011) Hearing aids and the history of electronics miniaturization. IEEE Ann Hist Comput 33(2):24–45
Hunn, N (2014) Hearables—the new wearables. http://www.nickhunn.com/hearables-thenew-wearables. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Powers, T A, Froehlich, M (2014) Clinical results with a new wireless binaural directional hearing system. Hearing Review. http://www.hearingreview.com/2014/10/clinical-results-new-wireless-binaural-directional-hearing-system/. Accessed 23 Jan 2019
van Dijck J (2013) The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford University Press, New York
Cooling, G (2015) Hearing healthcare, what effect hearables? Just audiology stuff. https://www.google.com/amp/s/justaudiologystuff.com/hearing-healthcare-effect-hearables/amp/. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Alper M, Haller B (2017) Social media use and mediated sociality among individuals with communication disabilities in the digital age. In: Ellis K, Kent M (eds) Disability and social media: global perspectives. Routledge, London, New York, pp 133–146
Hopkins J (2016) The concept of affordances in digital media. In: Friese H et al (eds) Handbuch soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 1–8
Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. SOC 35:441–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000219
Ochsner B, Spöhrer M, Stock R (2015) Human, non-human, and beyond: cochlear implants in socio-technological environments. NanoEthics 9(3):237–250
Ochsner B (2018) Oikos und Oikonomia oder: Selbstsorge-Apps als Technologien der Haushaltung. Jahrbuch für Medienphilosophie 4:123–147
Martin LH (ed) (1988) Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass
Bøhler KK, Giannoumis GA (2018) Technologies for active citizenship and the agency of objects. In: Halvorsen R, Hvinden B, Beadle-Brown J, Biggeri M, Tøssebro J, Waldschmidt A (eds) Active citizenship and disability in Europe. Routledge, London, pp 192–207
Moser I (2006) Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Inf Commun Soc 9(3):373–395
Ellcessor, E, Kirkpatrick, B (eds) (2017) Disability media studies. New York University Press, New York
Mills M, Sterne J (2017) Afterword II: dismediation – three proposals, six tactics. In: Ellcessor E, Kirkpatrick B (eds) Disability media studies. New York University Press, New York, pp 365–378
Knox Bassett R (2002) To the digital age: research labs, start-up companies, and the rise of MOS technology. John Hopkins UP, Baltimore
Oshlyansky L, Thimbleby H, Cairns P (2004) Breaking affordance: culture as context. NordiCHI 23–27:81–84
Lipp B (2017) Analytik des Interfacing. Zur Materialität technologischer Verschaltung in prototypischen Milieus robotisierter Pflege. Behemoth A J Civilisation 10(1):107–129. https://doi.org/10.6094/behemoth.2017.10.1.948
ReSound LIINX2: Rediscover hearing. https://www.resound.com/de-at/hearing-aids/resound-hearing-aids/linx2. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Hendren S (2014) All technology is assistive. https://www.wired.com/2014/10/all-technology-is-assistive/. Accessed 20 May 2020
Turkle S (2007) Evocative objects: things we think with. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Miller D (2010) Stuff. Polity Press, Cambridge
Miller D (2008) The comfort of things. Polity Press, Cambridge
Wajcman J, Bittman M, Brown J (2009) Intimate connections: the impact of the mobile phone on work/life boundaries. In: Goggin G, Hjorth L (eds) Mobile technologies: from telecommunications to media. Routledge, New York, pp 9–22
Kaerlein T (2017) Smartphones als digitale Nahkörpertechnologien: Zur Kybernetisierung des Alltags. Transcript, Bielefeld
Bröckling U (2007) Das unternehmerische Selbst. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Balke F (2014) Selbstsorge/Selbsttechnologie. In: Kammler C et al (eds) Foucault-Handbuch. Metzler, Stuttgart, pp 186–291
Deleuze G (1999) Foldings, or the inside of thought (Subjectivation). In: Deleuze G, Hand S (eds) Foucault. Continuum, New York, pp 78–101
Foucault M (1994) Dits et écrits IV: 1980–88. Gallimard, Paris
Beer D (2012) The comfort of mobile media: uncovering personal attachments with everyday devices. Int J Res New Media Technol 18(4):361–367
Hennion A (2010) Vous avez dit attachements? In: Akrich M (ed) Débordements: Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon. Presses des Mines, Paris, s.p
Plazak J, Kersten-Oertel M (2018) A survey on the affordances of “hearables”. Inventions 3(3):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions3030048
Terranova T (2000) Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text 18(2):33–58
Ochsner B (2018) AudioVisual Accesibility (Ava) oder: Zur Herstellung prekärer Kommunikationsgemeinschaften. In: Bennke J, Seifert J, Siegler M, Terberl C (eds) Das Mitsein der Medien: Prekäre Koexistenzen von Menschen, Maschinen und Algorithmen. Wilhelm Fink, Paderborn, pp 121–146
ReSound LiNX2 review – learn how the LiNX2 opened up a whole new world for Steve DeLuca, | ReSound. Published July 25, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahwS_xWGG98. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Bussolini J (2010) What is a dispositive? Foucault Studies 10:85–107
Papenburg G (2011) Hörgeräte. Technisierung der Wahrnehmung durch Rock- und Popmusik. Dissertation (PhD thesis), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Testimonials. What our users have to say. https://www.resound.com/en/why-resound/reviews. Accessed 23 January 2020
Parisi L (2013) Luciana Parisi im Gespräch mit Erich Hörl. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 8(1):35–51
Akrich M (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE, Law J (eds) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 205–224
Puar JK (2009) Prognosis time: towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. J Fem Theory 19(2):161–172
Rose N, Abi-Rached J (2014) Governing through the brain: neuropolitics, neuroscience and subjectivity. Camb Anthropol 32(1):3–23
Bröckling U, Krasmann S, Lemke T (eds) (2000) Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Swain, F, Jones, D Phantom terrains http://phantomterrains.com/. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Swain, F (2015) What to think about when you think about hearables. https://medium.com/@sciencepunk/what-to-think-about-when-you-think-about-hearables-131d847125a. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Kleege G (2018) More than meets the eye. What blindness brings to art. Oxford University Press, New York
Geese N (2018) Mobilitätsassistenzen für blinde Menschen. In: Klettner AK, Lingelbach G (eds) Blindheit in der Gesellschaft. Historischer Wandel und interdisziplinäre Zugänge. Campus, Frankfurt a.M., pp 153–190
Wong S (2018) Traveling with blindness. A qualitative space-time approach to understanding visual impairment and urban mobility. Health Place 49:85–92
Goggin G, Newell C (2006) Disabling cell phones. In: Kavoori AP, Arceneaux N (eds) The cell phone reader: essays in social transformation. Lang, New York, pp 155–172
Rodaway P (1994) Sensuous geographies: body, sense and place. Routledge, London
Paterson M (2014) Blindness, empathy, and “feeling seeing”: literary and insider accounts of blind experience. Emot Space Soc 10:95–104
Burton J, Macken WJ, Jones DM (2008) Linkages between auditory perception and action: acoustic affordances. Int J Psychol 43:306
Saerberg S (2011) The sensorification of the invisible: science, blindness and the life-world. Sci Technol Innov Stud 7:9–28
App BlindSquare. Pioneering accessible navigation – indoors and outdoors. http://www.blindsquare.com/.
See https://apfelschule.ch/tipps-und-tricks/envision-ai-eine-weitere-app-die-auf-kuenstliche-intelligenz-baut/. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
For a review of SeeingAI see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otuY6DeVx80. Accessed 23 Jan 2020
Supper A (2012) The search for the “killer application”: drawing the boundaries around the sonification of scientific data. In: Pinch T, Bijsterveld K (eds) The Oxford handbook of sound studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 249–272
Supper A, Bijsterveld K (2015) Sounds convincing: modes of listening and sonic skills in knowledge making. Interdiscip Sci Rev 40(2):124–144
Vickers P, Hogg B, Worrall D (2017) Aesthetics of sonification: taking the subject-position. In: Wöllner C (ed) Body, sound and space in music and beyond: multimodal explorations. London, Routledge, pp 89–109
Piore A (2018) Body builders: inside the science of the engineered human. Ecco, New York
Pachler N, Bachmair B, Cook J (2010) Mobile learning: structures, agency, practices. Springer US, Boston
Lupton D, Maslen S (2018) The more-than-human sensorium: sensory engagements with digital self-tracking technologies. Senses Soc 13(2):190–202
Spöhrer M (2018) Playing with auditory environments in audio games: Snake 3D. In: Spöhrer M (ed) Analytical frameworks, applications and impacts of ICT and actor-network theory. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 87–111
Passoth J-H, Peuker B, Schillmeier M (2012) Introduction. In: Passoth J-H, Peuker B, Schillmeier M (eds) Agency without actors? New approaches to collective action. Routledge, London, pp 1–10
Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? Routledge, London, pp 196–223
Hernes T (2010) Actor-network theory, Callon’s scallops, and process-based organization studies. In: Hernes T, Maitlis S (eds) Process, sensemaking and organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–184
Ritterbusch S, Jaworek G (2018) Camassia: monocular interactive mobile way sonification. In: Miesenberger K, Kouroupetroglou G (eds) Computers helping people with special needs. Springer, Cham, pp 12–18
Heidelberger, M (2018) Optical path recognition made audible. “Camassia” smartphone app: assistance system helps the visually impaired to acoustically perceive footpaths. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology https://www.kit.edu/kit/english/pi_2018_029_optical-path-recognition-made-audible.php. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
A video sample of Camassia’s use can be found on here: https://www.kit.edu/downloads/camassia_demonstration.mp4. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Bachstein, P (2018) Der Weg als Klangmuster. App Camassia – akustische Mobilitätshilfe für blinde und sehbehinderte Nutzer. Peter Bachsteins schöne Ecke. https://schoeneecke.wordpress.com/2018/04/26/der-weg-als-klangmuster-app-camassia-akustische-mobilitaetshilfe-fuer-blinde-und-sehbehinderte-nutzer/. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
Korn, S (2018) Orientierungshilfe für Blinde durch Bilderkennung http://korns-seite.de/blog_silja_korn/orientierungshilfe-fur-blinde-durch-bilderkennung/. Accessed 30 Mar 2019
Martinez M, Constantinescu A, Schauerte B, Koester D, Stiefelhagen R (2014) Cognitive evaluation of haptic and audio feedback in short range navigation tasks. In: Miesenberger K et al (eds) Computers helping people with special needs. Springer, Cham, pp 128–135
Mills, M (2015) Optophones and musical print. Sounding Out! https://soundstudiesblog.com/2015/01/05/optophones-and-musical-print/. Accessed 30 Mar 2020
The vOICe. https://www.seeingwithsound.com/. Accessed 16 Jun 2020
Pickering A (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Shildrick M (2012) Critical disability studies: rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In: Watson N, Roulstone A, Thomas C (eds) Routledge handbook of disability studies. Routledge, London, pp 30–41
Hörl E (2018) The environmentalitarian situation: reflections on the becoming-environmental of thinking, power, and capital. Cultural Politics 14(2):153–173