Restoration of fire in managed forests: a model to prioritize landscapes and analyze tradeoffs
Tóm tắt
Ongoing forest restoration on public lands in the western US is a concerted effort to counter the growing incidence of uncharacteristic wildfire in fire‐adapted ecosystems. Restoration projects cover 725,000 ha annually, and include thinning and underburning to remove ladder and surface fuel, and seeding of fire‐adapted native grasses and shrubs. The backlog of areas in need of restoration combined with limited budgets requires that projects are implemented according to a prioritization system. The current system uses a stand‐scale metric that measures ecological departure from pre‐settlement conditions. Although conceptually appealing, the approach does not consider important spatial factors that influence both the efficiency and feasibility of managing future fire in the post‐treatment landscape. To address this gap, we developed a spatial model that can be used to explore different landscape treatment configurations and identify optimal project parameters that maximize restoration goals. We tested the model on a 245,000 ha forest and analyzed tradeoffs among treatment strategies as defined by fire behavior thresholds, total area treated, and the proportion of the project area treated. We assumed the primary goal as the protection and conservation of old growth ponderosa pine trees from potential wildfire loss. The model located optimal project areas for restoration and identified treatment areas within them, although the location was dependent on assumptions about acceptable fire intensity within restored landscapes, and the total treated area per project. When a high percentage of stands was treated (e.g., >80%), the resulting project area was relatively small, leaving the surrounding landscape at risk for fire. Conversely, treating only a few stands with extreme fire behavior (<20%) created larger projects, but substantial old growth forests remained susceptible to wildfire mortality within the project area. Intermediate treatment densities (35%) were optimal in terms of the overall reduction in the potential wildfire mortality of old growth. The current work expands the application in spatial optimization to the problem of dry forest restoration, and demonstrates a decision support protocol to prioritize landscapes and specific areas to treat within them. The concepts and model can be applied to similar problems in spatial ecology.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrews P. L, 2007, BehavePlus fire modeling system: past, present, and future, Proceedings of 7th Symposium on Fire and Forest, 13
Carroll A. L, 2004, Effects of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia, Mountain pine beetle symposium: challenges and solutions, 223
Christensen V, 2004, Trade-offs in ecosystem-scale optimization of fisheries management policies, Bulletin of Marine Science, 74, 549
Collins B. M, 2010, Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes, Journal of Forestry, 108, 24, 10.1093/jof/108.1.24
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2007, Fire management—global assessment 2006. Forestry Paper No. 151
Finney M. A, 2009, Modeling large fire containment using generalized linear mixed model analysis, Forest Science, 55, 249, 10.1093/forestscience/55.3.249
Fitzgerald S. A, 2005, Fire ecology of ponderosa pine and the rebuilding of fire-resilient ponderosa pine ecosystems. PSW-GTR-198
Franklin J. F, 2003, Forging a science-based national forest fire policy, Issues in Science and Technology, 20, 59
Franklin J. F, 1986, Interim definitions for old-growth Douglas-fir and mixed-conifer forests in the Pacific Northwest and California. RN-PNW-447
Graham R, 2012, Fourmile Canyon fire findings. RMRS-GTR-289, USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Hann W. J, 2003, Fire regime condition class and associated data for fire and fuels planning: methods and applications, Fire, fuel treatments and ecological restoration. RMRS-P-29. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 397
Holsinger L, 2006, Chapter 11: Using historical simulations of vegetation to assess departure of current vegetation conditions across large landscapes, LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management. RMRS-GTR-175. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 315
Moilanen A, 2009, Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools, 10.1093/oso/9780199547760.001.0001
National Geospatial Data, 2009, MTBS Project, USDA Forest Service and US Geological Survey
NIFMID, 2011, National Interagency Fire Management Integrated Database at the National Information Technology Center in Kansas City, Missouri
Noss R, 2009, Chapter 12: prioritizing ecosystems, species and sites for restoration, Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools, 158, 10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0012
Rebain S. A, 2010, The fire and fuels extension to the forest vegetation simulator: updated model documentation. Internal Report
Rollins M. G, 2006, The LANDFIRE Prototype Project: nationally consistent and locally relevant geospatial data for wildland fire management. RMRS-GTR-175
Ryan K, 1994, Interactions between fire-injured trees and insects in the Greater Yellowstone area, Plants and their environments: Proceedings of the First Biennial Scientific Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. NPS/NRYELL/NRTR-93/xx. USDI National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA, 259
USDA-USDI (United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Interior), 2001, National Fire Plan: A collaborative approach for reducing wildland fire risks to communities and the environment