Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature

Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JWV, Stenberg R. Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: a three-year clinical evaluation. J Dent Child 1995;62:197–200.

Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2006;758-63.

Attwood D, Reid JS, Evans D. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth. Euro J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1994;2:183–185.

Chadwick BL, Dummer PMH, Dunstan F, et al. The longevity of dental restorations: A Systematic Review. Report 19, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. 2001.

Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation. J Amer Dent Assoc 2001;132:1110–1116.

Curzon MEJ, Toumba KJ. Restoration of primary teeth: Clinical criteria for assessment of the literature. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2006;7:48–52.

de Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Cury JA, Concicao EN. Fluoride release from fluoride-containing materials. Operative Dent 1996;21:185–190.

De Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modifies glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613–1619.

Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RT. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1459–1466.

Espelid I, Tveit AB, Tornes KH, Alvheim H. Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth. J Dent 1999;27:437–442.

Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique and development. J Public Health Dent 1996; 56:135–40.

Foley J. Alternative treatment strategies for carious primary teeth: An overview of the evidence. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2006;7:73–80.

Folkesson UH, Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JWV. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars. Swed Dent J 1999;23:1–9.

Fuks A, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani, Pinto PE. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:479–485.

Fuks A, Papagiannoulis L. Pulpotomy in primary teeth: Review of the literature according to standardized assessment criteria. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2006;7:64–71.

Hickel R, Manhart J. Glass-ionomers and compomers in pediatric dentistry; in Davidson, C.L. and Mjor, I.A. (eds): Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Publishing, pp. 201–226, 1999.

Hübel S, Mejàre I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Int J Paed Dent 2003;13:2–8.

Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial. Br Dent J 1995;179:175–179.

Kilpatrick NM, Neumann A. Durability of amalgam in the restoration of class II cavities in primary molars: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2007:8:4–12

Kotsanos N, Dionysopoulos P. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2004;5:136–142.

Milsom K M, Tickle M, Blinkhorn A. The prescription and relative outcomes of different materials used in general dental practice in the north west region of England to restore the primary dentition. J Dent 2002:30:77–82.

Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2002:60:25–28.

Mount G. Glass ionomer cements and future research. Am J Dent 1994: 7:286–292.

Osborne JW, Albino JE. Psychological and medical effects of mercury intake from dental amalgam: a status report from the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1999:12:151–156.

Ostlund J, Moller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars—a three year clinical evaluation. Swed Dent J 1992:16:81–86.

Peretz B, Ram D. Restorative material for children’s teeth: preferences or parents and children. J Dent Child 2002:69:243–248.

Pitts NB, Chestnutt IG, Evans D, et al. The dentinal caries experience of children in the United Kingdom, 2003. Br Dent J 2006:200:313–320.

Poulsen S, Pedersen MM. Dental caries in Danish children: 1988–2001. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002:3:195–198.

Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odont Scand 1990:48:305–311.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997:76:1387–1396.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontolog Scand 2004a:62:37–45.

Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers PT. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. J Dent 2004b:32:285–294.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. Eur J Oral Sci 2004c:112:188–196.

Roberts JF, Attari N, Sherriff M. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice. Brit Dent J 2005:198:427–431.

Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2000:22:486–488.

Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Int J Paed Dent 2002:12:146–147.

Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS, Tickle M. General Dental Practitioners’ views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars. Brit Dent J 2005:199:453–456.

Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Materials 1994:12:64–69.

Waggoner WF. Anterior crowns for primary anterior teeth: An evidence based assessment of the literature. Eur Arch Paed Dent 2006:753-57.

Walls AWG, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition. Br Dent J 1988:165:13–17.

Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991:170:177–181.

Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Brit Dent J 2000:189:93–97.

Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new transluscent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972:132:133–135.

Yu C, Gao X-J, Deng D-M, Yip H-K, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 2004:54:42–46.