Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation

Daniel W. Tigard1
1Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractResponsibility is among the most widespread buzzwords in the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. Yet, the term often remains unsubstantiated when employed in these important technological domains. Indeed, notions like ‘responsible AI’ and ‘responsible robotics’ may sound appealing, for they seem to convey a sense of moral goodness or ethical approval, thereby inciting psychological connections to self-regulation, social acceptance, or political correctness. For AI and ethics to come together in truly harmonious ways, we will need to work toward establishing a common appreciation. In this commentary, I breakdown three varieties of the term and invoke insights from the analytic ethics literature as a means of offering a robust understanding of moral responsibility in emerging technology. While I do not wish to accuse any parties of incorrect usage, my hope is that together researchers in AI and ethics can be better positioned to appreciate and to develop notions of responsibility for technological domains.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bietti, E.: From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 210–219 (2020)

Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., et al.: Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world. Connect. Sci. 29(2), 124–129 (2017)

Dignum, V.: Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer, New York (2019)

Gunkel, D.: Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility. Ethics Inf. Technol. 1–14 (2017)

Illankoon, P., Tretten, P., Kumar, U.: Modelling human cognition of abnormal machine behaviour. Human Intell. Syst. Integr. 1(1), 3–26 (2019)

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E.: The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1(9), 389–399 (2019)

Martin, K.: Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. J. Bus. Ethics 160(4), 835–850 (2019)

Mittelstadt, B.: ‘The doctor will not see you now’: the algorithmic displacement of virtuous medicine. In: Otto, P., Gräf, E. (eds.) 3TH1CS—The Reinvention of Ethics in the Digital Age. IRights Media, Berlin (2017)

Murphy, R., Woods, D.D.: Beyond Asimov: the three laws of responsible robotics. IEEE Intell. Syst. 24(4), 14–20 (2009)

Nyholm, S.: Humans and Robots: Ethics, Agency, and Anthropomorphism. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2020)

Ryan, M., & Stahl, B.C.: Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. (2020)

Shoemaker, D.: Responsibility from the Margins. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

Strawson, P.: Freedom and resentment. Proc. Br. Acad. 48, 1–25 (1962)

Tigard, D.: Artificial moral responsibility: how we can and cannot hold machines responsible. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (forthcoming)

Tigard, D.: There is no techno-responsibility gap. Philos. Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00414-7

Umbrello, S.: Imaginative value sensitive design: Using moral imagination theory to inform responsible technology design. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26, 575–595 (2020)

Van Oudheusden, M.: Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond. J. Responsib. Innov. 1(1), 67–86 (2014)

van Wynsberghe, A., Donhauser, J.: The dawning of the ethics of environmental robots. Sci. Eng. Ethics 24(6), 1777–1800 (2018)

Zhu, W.: 4 Steps to Developing Responsible AI. World Economic Forum (2019). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/06/4-steps-to-developing-responsible-ai/. Accessed 11 Sept 2020

Coeckelbergh, M.: Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26(4), 2051–2068 (2020)