Responsibility and the Brain Sciences

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 12 Số 5 - Trang 511-524 - 2009
Felipe De Brigard1, Eric Mandelbaum1, David Ripley1
1Department of Philosophy, UNC/Chapel Hill, CB #3125, Caldwell Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3125, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alicke M (2000) Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol Bull 126(4):556–574, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556

Borum R, Fulero S (1999) Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: evidence towards informed policy. Law Hum Behav 23(1):117–135, doi: 10.1023/A:1022330908350

Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

Fodor J (1974) Special sciences (or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28(2):97–115, doi: 10.1007/BF00485230

Gazzaniga M (2005) Neuroscience and the law. Sci Am Mind 16(1):42–49

Gilbert D (1999) What the mind’s not. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y (eds) Dual process theories in social psychology. Guilford, New York, pp 3–11

Greene J, Cohen J (2004) For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:1775–1785 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1546

Haidt J (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychol Rev 108:814–834

Knobe J (2003) Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63:190–193, doi: 10.1111/1467-8284.00419

Lerner J, Goldberg J, Tetlock P (1998) Sober second thought: the effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 24(6):563–574 doi: 10.1177/0146167298246001

Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55

Maikovich A (2005) A new understanding of terrorism using cognitive dissonance principles. J Theory Soc Behav 35(4):373–397, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00282.x

Mandelbaum E, Ripley D, De Brigard F (in preparation) Abstract thought in concrete situations

Nadelhoffer T (2006) Bad acts, blameworthy agents, and intentional actions: some problems for jury impartiality. Philos Explor 9(2):203–220, doi: 10.1080/13869790600641905

Nahmias E (2006) Folk fears about freedom and responsibility: determinism vs. reductionism. J Cogn Cult 6:215–237, doi: 10.1163/156853706776931295

Nichols S, Knobe J (2007) Moral responsibility and determinism: the cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous 41(4):663–685, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00666.x

Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Sci 185:1124–1131, doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124