Response to the comment on “Studies of radon-exposed miner cohorts using a biologically based model: comparison of current Czech and French data with historic data from China and Colorado” by W.F. Heidenreich, L. Tomášek, A. Rogel, D. Laurier, M. Tirmarche (2004) Radiat Environ Biophys 43:247–256

Brugmans MJP, Rispens SM, Bijwaard H, Laurier D, Rogel A, Tomášek L, Tirmarche M (2004) Radon-induced lung cancer in French and Czech miner cohorts described with a two-mutation cancer model. Radiat Environ Biophys 43:153–163 Heidenreich WF, Tomášek L, Rogel A, Laurier D, Tirmarche M (2004) Studies of radon-exposed miners in the Czech Republic and in France, using a biologically based model; comparison with historic data from China and the Colorado plateau. Radiat Environ Biophys 43:247–256 Brugmans MJP, Bijward H, Leenhouts HP (2002) The overrated role of ‘promotion’ in mechanistic modelling of radiation carcinogenesis. J Radiol Prot 22:A75–A79 Heidenreich WF, Hoogenveen RT (2001) Limits of applicability for the deterministic approximation of the two-step clonal expansion model. Risk Anal 21:103–105 Luebeck EG, Heidenreich WF, Hazelton WD, Paretzke HG, Moolgavkar SH (1999) Biologically-based analysis of the Colorado uranium miners cohort data: age, dose and dose-rate effects. Radiat Res 152:339–351 Hazelton WD, Luebeck EG, Heidenreich WF, Moolgavkar SH (2001) Analysis of a historical cohort of Chinese tin miners with arsenic, cigarette, and pipe smoke exposures using the biologically based two-stage clonal expansion model. Radiat Res 156:78–94 Heidenreich WF, Brugmans MJP, Little MP, Leenhouts HP, Paretzke HG, Morin M, Lafuma J (2000) Analysis of lung tumour risk in radon-exposed rats: an intercomparison of multi-step modelling. Radiat Environ Biophys 39:253–264 Kaiser JC, Heidenreich WF, Monchaux G, Morlier JP, Collier CG (2004) Lung tumour risk in radon-exposed rats from different experiments: comparative analysis with biologically based models. Radiat Environ Biophys 43:189–201