Response of residential water demand to dynamic pricing: Evidence from an online experiment

Olmstead, 2009, Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation, Water Resour. Res., 45, 10.1029/2008WR007227 Pérez-Urdiales, 2016, Efficient water-using technologies and habits: a disaggregated analysis in the water sector, Ecol. Econ., 128, 117, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.011 Lopez-Nicolas, 2018, vol. 101, 137 Rougé, 2018, Assessment of smart-meter-enabled dynamic pricing at the utility and basin scales, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag., 144, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000888 Vesal, 2018, The externality from communal metering of residential water: the case of Tehran, Water Resources and Economics, 23, 53, 10.1016/j.wre.2018.01.002 Cominola, 2015, Benefits and challenges of using smart meters for advancing residential water demand modeling and management: a review, Environ. Model. Software, 72, 198, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.012 Brelsford, 2017, Growing into water conservation? Decomposing the drivers of reduced water consumption in Las Vegas, NV, Ecol. Econ., 133, 99, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.012 Pulido-Velazquez, 2008, Hydro-economic river basin modelling: the application of a holistic surface–groundwater model to assess opportunity costs of water use in Spain, Ecol. Econ., 66, 51, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.016 Pulido-Velazquez, 2013, Design of efficient water pricing policies integrating basinwide resource opportunity costs, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag., 139, 583, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000262 Macian-Sorribes, 2015, Definition of efficient scarcity-based water pricing policies through stochastic programming, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3925, 10.5194/hess-19-3925-2015 Faruqui, 2010, Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments, J. Regul. Econ., 38, 193, 10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y Ito, 2018, Moral suasion and economic incentives: field experimental evidence from energy demand, Am. Econ. J. Econ. Pol., 10, 240, 10.1257/pol.20160093 Joskow, 2012, Dynamic pricing of electricity, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 381, 10.1257/aer.102.3.381 Wolak, 2010 Dutta, 2017, A literature review on dynamic pricing of electricity, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 68, 1131, 10.1057/s41274-016-0149-4 Hicks, 1939 Espey, 1998, Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities, Energy Econ., 20, 273, 10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00013-3 Sterner, 2007, Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy, Energy Pol., 35, 3194, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.025 Brons, 2008, A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach, Energy Econ., 30, 2105, 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.004 Havranek, 2012, Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought, Energy Econ., 34, 201, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.09.003 Holtedahl, 2004, Residential electricity demand in Taiwan, Energy Econ., 26, 201, 10.1016/j.eneco.2003.11.001 Halicioglu, 2007, Residential electricity demand dynamics in Turkey, Energy Econ., 29, 199, 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.11.007 Becker, 1994, An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction, Am. Econ. Rev., 84, 396 Helson, 1964 Mizutani, 2018, The effect of demand response on electricity consumption under the existence of the reference price effect: evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment in Japan, Electr. J., 31, 16, 10.1016/j.tej.2018.01.004 Briesch, 1997, A comparative analysis of reference price models, J. Consum. Res., 24, 202, 10.1086/209505 Kalyanaram, 1995, Reference price and asymmetric price response effects: empirical generalizations and future research, Market. Sci., 14, 212, 10.1287/mksc.14.3.G212 O'Donoghue, 2018, Reference-dependent preferences, vol. 1, 1 Groves, 1973, A dual-process theory of habituation: neural mechanisms, 175 Espey, 1997, Price elasticity of residential demand for water: a meta‐analysis, Water Resour. Res., 33, 1369, 10.1029/97WR00571 Marzano, 2018, Determinants of the price response to residential water tariffs: meta-analysis and beyond, Environ. Model. Software, 101, 236, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.017 Nauges, 2003, Long-run study of residential water consumption, Environ. Resour. Econ., 26, 25, 10.1023/A:1025673318692 Wichman, 2014, Perceived price in residential water demand: evidence from a natural experiment, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 107, 308, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.017 Nataraj, 2011, Does marginal price matter? A regression discontinuity approach to estimating water demand, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 61, 198, 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.003 Schleich, 2019, Residential water demand responds asymmetrically to rising and falling prices, Appl. Econ., 1 Gaudin, 2006, Effect of price information on residential water demand, Appl. Econ., 38, 383, 10.1080/00036840500397499 Garrone, 2019, Price elasticity of water demand considering scarcity and attitudes, Util. Pol., 59, 100927, 10.1016/j.jup.2019.100927 Faruqui, 2014, The impact of dynamic pricing on residential and small commercial and industrial usage: new experimental evidence from Connecticut, Energy J., 137 Herter, 2010, Residential response to critical-peak pricing of electricity: California evidence, Energy, 35, 1561, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.022 Ida, 2013 Qiu, 2018, Effects of voluntary time-of-use pricing on summer electricity usage of business customers, Environ. Resour. Econ., 69, 417, 10.1007/s10640-016-0084-5 Aubin, 1995, Real‐time pricing of electricity for residential customers: econometric analysis of an experiment, J. Appl. Econom., 10, S171, 10.1002/jae.3950100510 Pellerano, 2017, Do extrinsic incentives undermine social norms? Evidence from a field experiment in energy conservation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 67, 413, 10.1007/s10640-016-0094-3 Wolak, 2007 Brent, 2019, Price perceptions in water demand, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 98, 102266, 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102266 Castledine, 2014, Free to choose: promoting conservation by relaxing outdoor watering restrictions, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 107, 324, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.004 Ferraro, 2011, The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 318, 10.1257/aer.101.3.318 Crone, 2017, Crowdsourcing participants for psychological research in Australia: a test of Microworkers, Aust. J. Psychol., 69, 39, 10.1111/ajpy.12110 Hirth, M, T. HoBfeld, and P. Tran-Gia, P. (2011). Anatomy of a crowdsourcing platform - using the example of microworkers.com. Fifth Int. Conf. Innovat. Mobile Internet Serv. Ubiquitous Comput. (IMIS), June 2011, 322-329. doi: 10.1109/IMIS.2011.89. Mayer, 1999 Beal, 2011 2013 2017 Abeler, 2019, Preferences for truth‐telling, Econometrica, 87, 1115, 10.3982/ECTA14673 Horton, 2011, The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market, Exp. Econ., 14, 399, 10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9 Tversky, 1986, Rational choice and the framing of decisions, J. Bus., 59, S251, 10.1086/296365 Andreoni, 1995, Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments, Q. J. Econ., 110, 1, 10.2307/2118508 Charness, 2012, Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 81, 1, 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009 Greenwald, 1976, Within-subjects designs: to use or not to use, Psychol. Bull., 83, 314, 10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314 Rosenthal, 1976 White, 1977, 273 Shettleworth, 2010 Inman, 2006, A review of residential water conservation tool performance and influences on implementation effectiveness, Urban Water J., 3, 127, 10.1080/15730620600961288 Snyder, 1974, Self-monitoring of expressive behavior, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 30, 526, 10.1037/h0037039 Arbués, 2003, Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review, J. Soc. Econ., 32, 81, 10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00005-2 Gillan, 2018 Dalhuisen, 2003, Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: a meta-analysis, Land Econ., 79, 292, 10.2307/3146872 Garrone, 2020, Incentives to water conservation under scarcity: comparing price and reward effects through stated preferences, J. Clean. Prod., 244, 118632, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118632 Vatn, 2010, An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1245, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018 Agthe, 1987, Equity, price elasticity, and household income under increasing block rates for water, Am. J. Econ. Sociol., 46, 273, 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1987.tb01966.x Kallbekken, 2010, The demand for earmarking: results from a focus group study, Ecol. Econ., 69, 2183, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.003 Sahin, 2016, Paradigm shift to enhanced water supply planning through augmented grids, scarcity pricing and adaptive factory water: a system dynamics approach, Environ. Model. Software, 75, 348, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.018 Borenstein, 2013, Effective and equitable adoption of opt-in residential dynamic electricity pricing, Rev. Ind. Organ., 42, 127, 10.1007/s11151-012-9367-3 Tembata, 2018, Collective decision making under drought: an empirical study of water resource management in Japan, Water Resources and Economics, 22, 19, 10.1016/j.wre.2017.11.001 Maas, 2020, Complements of the house: estimating demand-side linkages between residential water and electricity, Water Resources and Economics, 29, 100140, 10.1016/j.wre.2019.02.001