Resin Bond to Indirect Composite and New Ceramic/Polymer Materials: A Review of the Literature

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry - Tập 26 Số 6 - Trang 382-393 - 2014
Frank A. Spitznagel1, Sebastian D. Horvath2,3, Petra C. Guess1, Markus B. Blatz3,1
1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany
2Dentist in private practice, Jestetten, Germany
3Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractStatement of the ProblemResin bonding is essential for clinical longevity of indirect restorations. Especially in light of the increasing popularity of computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing‐fabricated indirect restorations, there is a need to assess optimal bonding protocols for new ceramic/polymer materials and indirect composites.Purpose of the StudyThe aim of this article was to review and assess the current scientific evidence on the resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials.Materials and MethodsAn electronicPubMed database search was conducted from 1966 toSeptember 2013 for in vitro studies pertaining the resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials.ResultsThe search revealed 198 titles. Full‐text screening was carried out for 43 studies, yielding 18 relevant articles that complied with inclusion criteria. No relevant studies could be identified regarding new ceramic/polymer materials. Most common surface treatments are aluminum‐oxide air‐abrasion, silane treatment, and hydrofluoric acid‐etching for indirect composite restoration. Self‐adhesive cements achieve lower bond strengths in comparison with etch‐and‐rinse systems. Thermocycling has a greater impact on bonding behavior than water storage.ConclusionsAir‐particle abrasion and additional silane treatment should be applied to enhance the resin bond to laboratory‐processed composites. However, there is an urgent need for in vitro studies that evaluate the bond strength to new ceramic/polymer materials.Clinical SignificanceThis article reviews the available dental literature on resin bond of laboratory composites and gives scientifically based guidance for their successful placement. Furthermore, this review demonstrated that future research for new ceramic/polymer materials is required.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0339

Kramer N, 2000, Adhesive luting of indirect restorations, Am J Dent, 13, 60d

Mowafy O, 2001, The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems, J Can Dent Assoc, 67, 97

10.1016/0109-5641(91)90057-6

10.1067/mpr.2003.50

10.1007/s00784-012-0752-y

10.1067/mpr.2002.128034

10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00119.x

10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70096-9

10.1590/S1678-77572004000100009

Honda MI, 2008, Effectiveness of indirect composite resin silanization evaluated by microtensile bond strength test, Am J Dent, 21, 153

10.1590/S1678-77572011005000011

Thordrup M, 2006, A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten‐year results, Quintessence Int, 37, 139

10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.005

10.2341/12-160-C

Gresnigt MM, 2013, Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3‐year follow‐up, J Adhes Dent, 15, 181

BojemüllerE ColdeaA. VITA ENAMIC technical‐scientific documentation.Bad Säckingen:VITA Zahnfabrik Germany;2012.

Kurbad A, 2013, A new, hybrid material for minimally invasive restorations in clinical use, Int J Comput Dent, 16, 69

10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003

Koller M, 2012, Arnetzl G. Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/ CAM: customization case study, Int J Comput Dent, 15, 159

3M/ESPE. Lava ultimate CAD/CAM restorative technical product profile.St.Paul (MN):3M Espe Dental Products;2011.

Blatz MB, 2004, In vitro durability of the resin bond to feldspathic ceramics, Am J Dent, 17, 169

Blatz MB, 2007, Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia, Quintessence Int, 38, 745

10.1007/s00784-009-0278-0

10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.040

10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.016

10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022

D'Arcangelo C, 2007, Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations, J Adhes Dent, 9, 319

10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00794.x

10.4012/dmj.27.515

10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.003

10.1089/pho.2004.22.351

Ellakwa AE, 2003, Effects of grit blasting and silanization on bond strengths of a resin luting cement to Belleglass HP indirect composite, Am J Dent, 16, 53

10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00005-2

10.1067/mpr.2001.113628

Nilsson E, 2000, Factors affecting the shear bond strength of bonded composite inlays, Int J Prosthodont, 13, 52

10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00398.x

Imamura GM, 1996, Enhancement of resin bonding to heat‐cured composite resin, Oper Dent, 21, 249

10.1016/0300-5712(95)00054-2

10.1016/0109-5641(92)90082-N

10.1016/0022-3913(91)90256-V

10.2334/josnusd.51.629

10.2334/josnusd.54.39

10.1007/s00784-011-0641-9

10.3109/00016357.2012.696686

Kobayashi K, 2009, Influence of priming agents on the short‐term bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic, Quintessence Int, 40, 545

10.4012/dmj.24.238

10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x

10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02505.x

10.1590/S0103-64402007000100010

Yoshida K, 1993, Shear bond strengths of two luting cements to laboratory‐cured prosthetic resin composite, Am J Dent, 6, 13

10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00062.x

10.2341/08-82

10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00851.x

10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00890.x

10.1016/j.jpor.2010.01.005

Gresnigt M, 2012, Bonding of glass ceramic and indirect composite to non‐aged and aged resin composite, J Adhes Dent, 14, 59

Arrais CA, 2009, Micromorphology of resin/dentin interfaces using 4th and 5th generation dual‐curing adhesive/cement systems: a confocal laser scanning microscope analysis, J Adhes Dent, 11, 15

10.2341/06-4

Aguiar TR, 2010, Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self‐adhesive resin luting cements to dentin, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 93, 122, 10.1002/jbm.b.31566

10.2341/11-081

10.1016/0022-3913(94)90079-5

10.1016/0109-5641(93)90059-Y

10.2341/07-152

Blatz MB, 2008, Influence of cementation technique on fracture strength and leakage of alumina all‐ceramic crowns after cyclic loading, Quintessence Int, 39, 23

10.1177/0022034509340881

10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x

10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9

10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00078-4

10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x

10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60180-3

10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00396.x

10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00061-5

10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148

10.1177/00220345950740091401

Oilo G, 1993, Bond strength testing—what does it mean?, Int Dent J, 43, 492

10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150

Salz U, 2010, Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue—a review, J Adhes Dent, 12, 343

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Tập 26 Số 6

382-393

Thông tin tác giả