Resilient patterns of democracy. A comparative analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arter, David. 2006.Democracy in Scandinavia. Consensual, majoritarian or mixed? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bach, Stanley. 2003.Platypus and parliament: The Australian senate in theory and practice. Canberra: Department of the Senate.
Bergmann, Torbjörn, Wolfgang C. Müller, Kaare Strom, and Magnus Blomgren. 2003. Democratic delegation and accountability: Cross-national patterns. InDelegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies, eds. Kaare Strom, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergmann, 109–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carey, John M., Octavio Amorim Neto, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1999. Appendix: Outlines of constitutional powers in Latin America. InPresidentialism and democracy in Latin America, eds. Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, 440–461. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christiano, Thomas. 1996.The rule of the many. Boulder: Westview Press.
Clark, William R., and Matt Golder. 2006. Rehabilitating Duverger’s theory: Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws.Comparative Political Studies 39 (6): 679–708.
Clark, William R., Matt Golder, and Sona Golder. 2009.Principles of comparative politics. Washington: CQ Press.
Clarke, Kevin A., and David M. Primo. 2007. Modernizing political science: A model-based approach.Perspectives on Politics 5 (4): 741–753.
Colomer, Josep M. 2005. It’s parties that choose electoral systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down).Political Studies 53:1–21.
Cox, Gary W. 1997.Making votes count. Strategic coordination in the worlds electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croissant, Aurel, and Teresa Schächter. 2009. Demokratiestrukturen in Asien: Befunde, Determinanten und Konsequenzen.Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 19 (3): 387–419.
Diermeier, Daniel, Hülya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo. 2007. Bicameralism and Government Formation.Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (3): 227–252.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990.The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fortin, Jessica. 2008. Patterns of democracy? Counterevidence from nineteen post-communist countries.Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2 (2): 198–220.
Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver, and Pater Mair. 2005.Representative government in modern Europe. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ganghof, Steffen. 2005. Politische Gleichheit und echte Mehrheitsdemokratie. Über die normativen Grundlagen institutioneller Arrangements.Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 15 (3): 741–763.
Ganghof, Steffen. 2009. Lässt sich eine „Verfassung der Rechtfertigung“ rechtfertigen? Zur Rolle demokratischer Entscheidungsregeln im Liberalismus.Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 19 (2): 275–301.
Ganghof, Steffen. 2010. Review Article: Democratic inclusiveness: A Reinterpretation of Lijphart’s Patterns of Democracy.British Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 679–692.
Ganghof, Steffen, and Thomas Bräuninger. 2006. Government status and legislative behaviour. Partisan veto players in Australia, Denmark, Finland and Germany.Party Politics 12 (4): 521–539.
Gaus, Gerald F. 1996.Justificatory liberalism: An essay on epistemology and political theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gerring, John, and Strom C. Thacker. 2008.A centripetal theory of democratic governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. 2001.Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kailitz, Steffen. 2008. Zwei Seiten der gleichen Medaille? Zum theoretischen und empirischen Zusammenhang zwischen der Regierungsform und der Ausgestaltung von Zweikammersystemen.Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 39 (2): 387–414.
Kastari, Paavo. 1970. The status and powers of the president in Finland. InJahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, eds. Gerhard Leibholz and Peter Häberle, 281–290. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck).
Kenworthy, Lane. 2006. Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance.Socio-Economic Review 4 (1): 69–91.
Lijphart, Arend. 1984.Democracies. patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twentyone countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999.Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 2003. Measurement validity and institutional engineering. Reflections on Rein Taagepera’s meta-study.Political Studies 51 (1): 20–25.
Lijphart, Arend. Detailed data used in patterns of democracy.
Linder, Wolf. 2005.Schweizerische Demokratie, 2. Aufl. Bern: Paul Haupt.
Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2001. Government formation in parliamentary democracies.American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 33–50.
McGann, Anthony J. 2006.The logic of democracy. Reconciling equality, deliberation, and minority protection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 2008. Demokratiemuster und Leistungsbilanz von Regierungen: Kritische Anmerkungen zu Arend Lijphart’s “Patterns of Democracy”.Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 2 (1): 1–17.
Nolte, Detlef, and Mariana Llanos. 2004. Starker Bikameralismus? Zur Verfassungslage lateinamerikanischer Zweikammersysteme.Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 35:113–131.
Nousiainen, Jaakko. 2000. Finland. The consolidation of parliamentary governance. InCoalition governments in Western Europe, eds. Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 264–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, Philip. 2000. Rational choice, functional selection and empty black boxes.Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1): 33–57.
Pierson, Paul. 2004.Politics in time. History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000.Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rasch, Björn E. 2000. Parliamentary floor voting procedures and agenda setting in Europe.Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (1): 3–23.
Raunio, Tapio. 2004. The changing Finnish democracy: Stronger parliamentary accountability, coalescing political parties and weaker external constraints.Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (2): 133–152.
Riker, William H. 1962.The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Samuels, David J., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 2003. Presidentialism, elections and representation.Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 33–60.
Scharpf, Fritz. 2009.Föderalismusreform: Kein Ausweg aus der Politikverflechtungsfalle?, Schriften aus dem MPI für Gesellschaftsforschung. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
Schmidt, Manfred G. 2008.Demokratietheorien. Eine Einführung, 4. Aufl. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Schwarz, Daniel, André Bächtiger, and George Lutz. 2010. Switzerland: Agenda-Setting Power of Government in a Separation-of-Powers Framework. InThe Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting, eds. Björn E. Rasch and George Tsebelis, Seitenzahl fehlt. London: Routledge.
Sjölin, Mats. 1993.Coalition politics and parliamentary power. Lund: Lund University Press.
Strøm, Kaare. 1990.Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taagepera, Rein. 1998. Effective magnitude and effective threshold.Electoral Studies 17 (4): 393–404.
Taagepera, Rein. 2003. Arend Lijphart’s dimensions of democracy: Logical connections and institutional design.Political Studies 51 (1): 1–19.
Tsebelis, George. 2002.Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vatter, Adrian. 2009. Lijphart expanded: Three dimensions of democracy in advanced OECD countries?European Political Science Review 1 (1): 125–154.