Residency Programs and Psychotherapy Competencies: A Survey of Chief Residents
Tóm tắt
To survey chief residents’ opinion about various aspects of psychotherapy competency determination. Chief residents of various psychiatry residency programs were surveyed. One hundred two chief residents were surveyed. Seventy two (70.58%) completed the survey. Eighty four percent of the respondents reported that they were aware of the competencies. The number of patients required for competency determination in five areas of psychotherapy varied widely among the programs. Global assessment by psychotherapy supervisors was the most commonly used method of competency determination (61%). Nineteen (26%) chief residents opined that not all the faculty members involved in teaching and assessing competencies are qualified to do so. Only 23 (31%) of respondents reported that competency criteria were well integrated into the residency curriculum. The little consistency in psychotherapy competency determination across various programs, the differential preparedness of programs for competencies and the lack of consistent integration of competencies into residency curricula call for development and implementation of more uniform assessment methods. This variability also calls into question the decision to establish a standard in five areas of psychotherapy competency.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Yager J, Kay J, Mellman L: Assessing psychotherapy competence: A beginning. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 125–127
Mellman LA, Beresin E: Psychotherapy competencies: development and implementation. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 149–153
Manring J, Beitman BD, Dewan MJ: Evaluating competence in psychotherapy. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 136–144
Giordano FL, Briones DF: Assessing residents’ competence in psychotherapy. Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 145–147
Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D: A Canadian simulation experience: faculty and student opinions of a performance evaluation study. Br J Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 779–781
Day SC, Grosso LJ, Norcini JJ Jr, et al: Residents’ perception of evaluation procedures used by their training program. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 421–426
Cogill KK, O’Sullivan PS, Clardy J: Residents’ perception of effectiveness of twelve evaluation methods for measuring competency. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 76–81
Yager J, Bienenfeld D: How competent are we to assess psychotherapeutic competence of psychiatric residents? Acad Psychiatry 2003; 27: 174–181
Falender CA, Cornish JA, Goodyear R, et al: Defining competencies in psychology supervision: a consensus statement. J Clin Psychol 2004; 60: 771–785