Research assessment and the activity hypothesis

Emerald - Tập 20 Số 1 - Trang 7-28 - 2013
PeterLansley1
1School of Construction Management and Engineering, The University of Reading, Reading, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeAnalyses of the results of research assessment exercises (RAEs) carried out in the UK in 1996 and 2001 supported a simple hypothesis, that the grade awarded to a university department can be related to its level of activity in terms of, for example, number of research students, research studentships secured, research degrees awarded, research funded from external sources, and the profile of publications. The purpose of this paper is to consider the extent to which these relationships prevailed for the most recent RAE in 2008.Design/methodology/approachInformation from 157 departments from five subject areas was subjected to extensive correlation analysis and regression modelling, informed by the findings from analyses of previous RAEs.FindingsAlthough the information submitted by universities to RAE 2008 was the same as for previous RAEs, a different methodology was employed for assessing their performance. Establishing a relationship between the assessments of research quality of departments and measures of activity was more challenging than previously. Differences between subject areas were large and it was not possible to develop a single model applicable to the five subject areas.Practical implicationsDespite the relationship with performance being much less obvious than for previous RAEs, activity levels are important to success, but in different ways in different subject areas.Originality/valueThe paper indicates the extent to which expectations about the importance of key research‐related activities, expressed as simple quantitative measures, are reflected in qualitative assessments of performance, given the increasing complexity and subtlety of the assessment process.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

HEFCE (2006), “RAE milestone reached – criteria and working methods published”, January, available at: www.rae.ac.uk/news/2006/criteria.htm (accessed 2 February 2011).

HEFCE (2009a), “RAE2008 subject overview reports”, January, available at: www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/ov/ (accessed 2 February 2011).

HEFCE (2009b), “RAE2008 submissions published”, April, available at: www.rae.ac.uk/news/2009/sub.asp (accessed 2 February 2011).

HEFCE (2009c), “Previous RAEs”, available at: www.rae.ac.uk/aboutus/previous/ (accessed 2 February 2011).

HEFCE (2010), “Research excellence framework”, available at: www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/(accessed 2 February 2011).

Lansley, P.R. (1999), “Determinants of the performance of UK universities in Built Environment and Town and Country Planning research”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 391‐402.

Lansley, P.R. (2007), “Making sense of research quality assessment”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 7‐25.

HEFCE (2008), “RAE2008 confirms UK's dominant position in international research”, December, available at: www.rae.ac.uk/news/2008/results.asp (accessed 2 February 2011).

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 20 Số 1

7-28

Thông tin tác giả