Rescaling Spatial Planning: Spatial Planning Reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands
Tóm tắt
Following a wave of spatial planning reforms at the beginning of the 21st century, a second wave of reforms has recently swept through several European countries. In this study we investigate the significance of these latest developments by analysing the reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands from the perspective of rescaling, the process of redividing tasks, and responsibilities between the various tiers of government. We show that the reasoning behind the new planning systems and the philosophy they were based on were remarkably similar. Typical catchphrases, such as ‘closer to the citizen’ and ‘development-oriented spatial planning’, were used in each of the countries under study. Although the second wave of changes is legitimised by much of the same wording, the changes are significantly different because comprehensive visions on the integrated spatial development at the national and regional level have been almost completely abandoned. The loss of this ‘something more’ seems to impact the core of spatial planning.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Buitelaar E, 2010, Ex-durante evaluatie Wet ruimtelijke ordening
DCLG, Department of Communities and Local Government
DCLG, DBIS, 2010, Policy Statement on Regional Strategies Department of Communities and Local Government and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Deas I, 2006, Territory, Identity and Spatial Planning: Spatial Governance in a Fragmented Society, 83
DTLR, 2001, Planning: Delivering Fundamental Change Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions
DTLR, 2002, Sustainable Communities: Delivering through Planning Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions
European Commission, 1999, ESDP: European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU
Galle M, 2008, Stedebouw and ruimtelijke ordening, 89, 58
Glaeser E, 2011, Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier
Haughton G, 2010, The New Spatial Planing Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries
IPO, 2011, “Provincies gaan door …”
Keating M, 1998, The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change
Kersten P, 2005, Oproep tot vakdebat over ruimtelijke ordening
KL, 2009, KL høringssvar til Udkast til Landsplanredegørelsen
MIM, 2011, Beleidsbrief Eenvoudig Beter
MIM, 2012, Structuurvisie Infrastructuur en Ruimte. Nederland concurrerend, bereikbaar, leefbaar en veilig
National Trust, 2011, “Consultation on the government's proposal for a new National Planning Policy Framework: a response from the National Trust”
Needham B, 2011, Essaybundel over decentralisatie ruimtelijk beleid
ODPM, 2004, Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004: Explanatory Notes
Pierre J, 2000, Governance, Politics and the State
POS, 2010, Conservatives Planning Green Paper Shows Immense Promise
Sagan I, 2005, Regionalism Contested: Institution, Society and Governance
Snickars F, 2002, Reshaping Regional Planning: A Northern Perspective
TCPA, 2010, TCPA Response to Conservative Planning Green Paper: Press Release 12/2/2010
TCPA, 2011, “The draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) TCPA Public Briefing note DRAFT”
Verschuuren J, 2010, Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal [Potchefstroom Elektroniese Regstydskrif], 13, 5
VNG, 2008, Nationaal ruimtelijk beleid onder de nieuwe Wro
Wet op de Ruimtelijke Ordening, 1965, Staatsblad nr 340
WRR, 1999, Spatial Development Policy: Summary of the 53rd Report