Rescaling Spatial Planning: Spatial Planning Reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands

SAGE Publications - Tập 33 Số 1 - Trang 184-198 - 2015
Petra H Roodbol-Mekkes1, A. van den Brink2
1Wageningen University, Land Use Planning Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
2Wageningen University, Land Use Planning Group and Landscape Architecture Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Following a wave of spatial planning reforms at the beginning of the 21st century, a second wave of reforms has recently swept through several European countries. In this study we investigate the significance of these latest developments by analysing the reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands from the perspective of rescaling, the process of redividing tasks, and responsibilities between the various tiers of government. We show that the reasoning behind the new planning systems and the philosophy they were based on were remarkably similar. Typical catchphrases, such as ‘closer to the citizen’ and ‘development-oriented spatial planning’, were used in each of the countries under study. Although the second wave of changes is legitimised by much of the same wording, the changes are significantly different because comprehensive visions on the integrated spatial development at the national and regional level have been almost completely abandoned. The loss of this ‘something more’ seems to impact the core of spatial planning.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1068/b3065

10.1080/13563470701203801

10.1080/1356347032000153142

10.4324/9780203831991

10.1080/01944369708975916

10.5949/UPO9781846313639

10.1080/17535060701795298

10.1093/0199259259.001.0001

10.1177/09697764030104002

Buitelaar E, 2010, Ex-durante evaluatie Wet ruimtelijke ordening

10.1068/c0221

10.1068/c0135

10.3828/tpr.2010.24

DCLG, Department of Communities and Local Government

DCLG, DBIS, 2010, Policy Statement on Regional Strategies Department of Communities and Local Government and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

Deas I, 2006, Territory, Identity and Spatial Planning: Spatial Governance in a Fragmented Society, 83

DTLR, 2001, Planning: Delivering Fundamental Change Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions

DTLR, 2002, Sustainable Communities: Delivering through Planning Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions

10.1080/1354983042000255315

10.1080/13597560802351655

European Commission, 1999, ESDP: European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU

10.1068/c11150

10.1080/09654313.2012.680584

Galle M, 2008, Stedebouw and ruimtelijke ordening, 89, 58

10.4324/9780203933435

Glaeser E, 2011, Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier

10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00522.x

10.1080/713666411

10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00115.x

Haughton G, 2010, The New Spatial Planing Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries

10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x

10.1080/09654319908720522

10.1080/02697450902742189

IPO, 2011, “Provincies gaan door …”

10.1080/13563475.2011.591140

10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00295.x

Keating M, 1998, The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change

10.1080/13597560802351630

10.1080/15705850802699995

Kersten P, 2005, Oproep tot vakdebat over ruimtelijke ordening

10.1080/14649350701324367

KL, 2009, KL høringssvar til Udkast til Landsplanredegørelsen

10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029875

10.1191/030913299669861026

10.1080/09654310600852670

10.1080/02697450902742114

MIM, 2011, Beleidsbrief Eenvoudig Beter

MIM, 2012, Structuurvisie Infrastructuur en Ruimte. Nederland concurrerend, bereikbaar, leefbaar en veilig

10.1080/0965431042000251909

10.1068/a36253

National Trust, 2011, “Consultation on the government's proposal for a new National Planning Policy Framework: a response from the National Trust”

Needham B, 2011, Essaybundel over decentralisatie ruimtelijk beleid

ODPM, 2004, Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004: Explanatory Notes

Østergård N, 2009, Plan, 3, 4, 10.18261/ISSN1504-3045-2009-03-04-02

10.1068/c49m

Pierre J, 2000, Governance, Politics and the State

POS, 2010, Conservatives Planning Green Paper Shows Immense Promise

10.1068/a44162

Sagan I, 2005, Regionalism Contested: Institution, Society and Governance

Snickars F, 2002, Reshaping Regional Planning: A Northern Perspective

10.1068/d9s

TCPA, 2010, TCPA Response to Conservative Planning Green Paper: Press Release 12/2/2010

TCPA, 2011, “The draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) TCPA Public Briefing note DRAFT”

10.4324/9780203008003

10.1068/a37308

Verschuuren J, 2010, Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal [Potchefstroom Elektroniese Regstydskrif], 13, 5

10.1080/09654310903226499

VNG, 2008, Nationaal ruimtelijk beleid onder de nieuwe Wro

Wet op de Ruimtelijke Ordening, 1965, Staatsblad nr 340

WRR, 1999, Spatial Development Policy: Summary of the 53rd Report

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

SAGE Publications

Tập 33 Số 1

184-198

Thông tin tác giả