Nghiên cứu chất lượng yêu cầu: lý thuyết hài hòa, đánh giá và lộ trình

Méndez Fernández D, Wagner S, Kalinowski M, Felderer M, Mafra P, Vetrò A, Conte T, Christiansson M-T, Greer D, Lassenius C et al (2017) Naming the pain in requirements engineering: contemporary problems, causes, and effects in practice. Empir Softw Eng 22(5):2298–2338 Wagner S, Méndez Fernández D, Felderer M, Vetrò A, Kalinowski M, Wieringa R, Pfahl D, Conte T, Christiansson M-T, Greer D et al (2019) Status quo in requirements engineering: a theory and a global family of surveys. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol (TOSEM) 28(2):1–48 Damian D, Chisan J (2006) An empirical study of the complex relationships between requirements engineering processes and other processes that lead to payoffs in productivity, quality, and risk management. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 32(7):433–453 Boehm BW, Papaccio PN (1988) Understanding and controlling software costs. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 14(10):1462–1477 Méndez Fernández D, Böhm W, Vogelsang A, Mund J, Broy M, Kuhrmann M, Weyer T (2019) Artefacts in software engineering: a fundamental positioning. Softw Syst Model 18(5):2777–2786 Montgomery L, Fucci D, Bouraffa A, Scholz L, Maalej W (2021) Empirical research on requirements quality: a systematic mapping study. Requir Eng 27:183–209 Frattini J, Montgomery L, Fischbach J, Unterkalmsteiner M, Mendez D, Fucci D (2022) A live extensible ontology of quality factors for textual requirements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05959 Franch X, Mendez D, Vogelsang A, Heldal R, Knauss E, Oriol M, Travassos G, Carver JC, Zimmermann T (2020) How do practitioners perceive the relevance of requirements engineering research? IEEE Trans Softw Eng 48(6):1947–1964 Berry D, Gacitua R, Sawyer P, Tjong SF (2012) The case for dumb requirements engineering tools. In: International working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality. Springer, pp 211–217 Femmer H (2018) Requirements quality defect detection with the Qualicen requirements scout. In: REFSQ workshops Phalp KT, Vincent J, Cox K (2007) Assessing the quality of use case descriptions. Softw Qual J 15(1):69–97 Lindland OI, Sindre G, Solvberg A (1994) Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw 11(2):42–49 Pohl K (1993) The three dimensions of requirements engineering. In: International Conference on advanced information systems engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 275–292 Broy M, Deißenböck F, Pizka M (2005) A holistic approach to software quality at work. In: Proceedings of the 3rd world congress for software quality (3WCSQ) Deissenboeck F, Wagner S, Pizka M, Teuchert S, Girard J-F (2007) An activity-based quality model for maintainability. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on software maintenance. IEEE, pp. 184–193 King P, Naughton P, DeMoney M, Kanerva J, Walrath K, Hommel S (2021) Code conventions for the Java programming language. Technical report, Sun Microsystems, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA 1999 Broy M, Deissenboeck F, Pizka M (2006) Demystifying maintainability. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on software quality, pp 21–26 Albrecht AJ, Gaffney JE (1983) Software function, source lines of code, and development effort prediction: a software science validation. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 6:639–648 McCabe TJ (1976) A complexity measure. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 4:308–320 Rosenberg J (1997) Some misconceptions about lines of code. In: Proceedings Fourth international software metrics symposium, pp. 137–142. IEEE Khoshgoftaar TM, Munson JC (1990) The lines of code metric as a predictor of program faults: a critical analysis. In: Proceedings fourteenth annual international computer software and applications conference. IEEE Computer Society, pp 408–409 Shepperd M (1988) A critique of cyclomatic complexity as a software metric. Softw Eng J 3(2):30–36 McCall JA (1977) Factors in software quality. US Rome Air development center reports Boehm BW, Brown JR, Lipow M (1976) Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: proceedings of the 2nd international conference on software engineering, pp 592–605 Kitchenham B, Linkman S, Pasquini A, Nanni V (1997) The squid approach to defining a quality model. Softw Qual J 6(3):211–233 Basili VR, Caldiera G, Rombach HD (1994) The goal question metric approach. Encyclopedia Softw Eng 1:528–532 Marinescu R, Ratiu D (2004) Quantifying the quality of object-oriented design: the factor-strategy model. In: 11th working conference on reverse engineering. IEEE, pp 192–201 Deissenboeck F, Juergens E, Lochmann K, Wagner S (2009) Software quality models: Purposes, usage scenarios and requirements. In: 2009 ICSE workshop on software quality. IEEE, pp 9–14 Boehm BW, Brown JR, Kaspar H, Lipow M, MacLeod G (1978) Merritt: characteristics of software quality. North Holland, Amsterdam Winter S, Wagner S, Deissenboeck F (2007) A comprehensive model of usability. In: IFIP international conference on engineering for human–computer interaction. Springer, Berlin, pp 106–122 Wagner S, Fernandez DM, Islam S, Lochmann K (2009) A security requirements approach for web systems. In: Workshop quality assessment in web (QAW 2009) Goeb A, Lochmann K (2011) A software quality model for SOA. In: Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on software quality, pp 18–25 Wagner S, Lochmann K, Heinemann L, Kläs M, Trendowicz A, Plösch R, Seidi A, Goeb A, Streit J (2012) The Quamoco product quality modelling and assessment approach. In: 2012 34th international conference on software engineering (ICSE). IEEE, pp 1133–1142 Wagner S, Lochmann K, Winter S, Deissenboeck F, Juergens E, Herrmannsdoerfer M, Heinemann L, Kläs M, Trendowicz A, Heidrich J et al (2012) The quamoco quality meta-model Deissenboeck F, Juergens E, Hummel B, Wagner S, y Parareda BM, Pizka M (2008) Tool support for continuous quality control. IEEE Softw 25(5):60–67 Deissenboeck F, Heinemann L, Herrmannsdoerfer M, Lochmann K, Wagner S (2011) The quamoco tool chain for quality modeling and assessment. In: 2011 33rd international conference on software engineering (ICSE). IEEE, pp 1007–1009 Steidl D, Deissenboeck F, Poehlmann M, Heinke R, Uhink-Mergenthaler B (2014) Continuous software quality control in practice. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on software maintenance and evolution. IEEE, pp 561–564 Lochmann K, Ramadani J, Wagner S (2013) Are comprehensive quality models necessary for evaluating software quality? In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on predictive models in software engineering, pp 1–9 Garvin DA (1984) What does product quality really mean. Sloan Manag Rev 25:25–43 Kläs M, Lochmann K, Heinemann L (2011) Evaluating a quality model for software product assessments-a case study. In: Proceedings of SQMB 11 Wagner S, Goeb A, Heinemann L, Kläs M, Lampasona C, Lochmann K, Mayr A, Plösch R, Seidl A, Streit J et al (2015) Operationalised product quality models and assessment: the Quamoco approach. Inf Softw Technol 62:101–123 Wagner S (2010) A Bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality models. Inf Softw Technol 52(11):1230–1241 Femmer H, Kučera J, Vetrò A (2014) On the impact of passive voice requirements on domain modelling. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pp 1–4 Ferrari A, Gori G, Rosadini B, Trotta I, Bacherini S, Fantechi A, Gnesi S (2018) Detecting requirements defects with NLP patterns: an industrial experience in the railway domain. Empir Softw Eng 23(6):3684–3733 Habib MK, Wagner S, Graziotin D (2021) Detecting requirements smells with deep learning: Experiences, challenges and future work. In: 2021 IEEE 29th international requirements engineering conference workshops (REW). IEEE, pp 153–156 Femmer H, Fernández DM, Wagner S, Eder S (2017) Rapid quality assurance with requirements smells. J Syst Softw 123:190–213 Berry DM, Bucchiarone A, Gnesi S, Lami G, Trentanni G (2006) A new quality model for natural language requirements specifications. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on requirements engineering: foundation of software quality (REFSQ) Lucassen G, Dalpiaz F, van der Werf JME, Brinkkemper S (2017) Improving user story practice with the Grimm method: a multiple case study in the software industry. In: International working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–252 Parra E, Dimou C, Llorens J, Moreno V, Fraga A (2015) A methodology for the classification of quality of requirements using machine learning techniques. Inf Softw Technol 67:180–195 Wilson WM, Rosenberg LH, Hyatt LE (1997) Automated analysis of requirement specifications. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on software engineering, pp 161–171 Yang H, De Roeck A, Gervasi V, Willis A, Nuseibeh B (2011) Analysing anaphoric ambiguity in natural language requirements. Requir Eng 16(3):163–189 Femmer H, Mund J, Fernández DM (2015) It’s the activities, stupid! A new perspective on re quality. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd international workshop on requirements engineering and testing. IEEE, pp 13–19 Femmer H, Vogelsang A (2018) Requirements quality is quality in use. IEEE Softw 36(3):83–91 Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30:611–642 Mund J, Fernandez DM, Femmer H, Eckhardt J (2015) Does quality of requirements specifications matter? Combined results of two empirical studies. In: 2015 ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp. 1–10. IEEE Juergens E, Deissenboeck F (2010) How much is a clone. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on software quality and maintainability, pp 79–88 Deissenboeck F, Pizka M (2007) The economic impact of software process variations. In: International conference on software process. Springer, Berlin, pp 259–271 Antinyan V, Staron M, Sandberg A, Hansson J (2016) A complexity measure for textual requirements. In: 2016 joint conference of the international workshop on software measurement and the international conference on software process and product measurement (IWSM-MENSURA). IEEE, pp 148–158 Sommerville I (2005) Integrated requirements engineering: a tutorial. IEEE Softw 22(1):16–23 Fischbach J, Frattini J, Vogelsang A, Mendez D, Unterkalmsteiner M, Wehrle A, Henao PR, Yousefi P, Juricic T, Radduenz J et al (2023) Automatic creation of acceptance tests by extracting conditionals from requirements: NLP approach and case study. J Syst Softw 197:111549 Petersen K, Wohlin C (2009) Context in industrial software engineering research. In: 2009 3rd international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. IEEE, pp 401–404 Cohn M (2004) User stories applied: for agile software development. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston Molléri JS, Petersen K, Mendes E (2020) An empirically evaluated checklist for surveys in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol 119:106240 Holsti OR (1969) Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. (Content analysis). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA Feng GC (2015) Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodol: Eur J Res Methods Behav Soc Sci 11(1):13 Bennett EM, Alpert R, Goldstein A (1954) Communications through limited-response questioning. Public Opin Q 18(3):303–308 Femmer H, Unterkalmsteiner M, Gorschek T (2017) Which requirements artifact quality defects are automatically detectable? A case study. In: 2017 IEEE 25th international requirements engineering conference workshops (REW). IEEE, pp 400–406 Kamata MI, Tamai T (2007) How does requirements quality relate to project success or failure? In: 15th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE 2007). IEEE, pp 69–78 Sinpang JS, Sulaiman S, Idris N (2017) Detecting ambiguity in requirements analysis using Mamdani fuzzy inference. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng (JTEC) 9(3–4):157–162 Chantree F, Nuseibeh B, De Roeck A, Willis A (2006) Identifying nocuous ambiguities in natural language requirements. In: 14th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE’06). IEEE, pp 59–68 Din CY, Rine D (2008) Requirements content goodness and complexity measurement based on NP chunks. VDM Publishing, Saarbrücken Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer, Berlin Landhaußer M, Korner SJ, Tichy WF, Keim J, Krisch J (2015) Denom: a tool to find problematic nominalizations using NLP. In: 2015 IEEE second international workshop on artificial intelligence for requirements engineering (AIRE), pp 1–8. IEEE Mackenzie JL (1985) Nominalization and valency reduction. Predicates and terms in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson, Foris, pp 31–51 Méndez Fernández D, Penzenstadler B, Kuhrmann M, Broy M (2010) A meta model for artefact-orientation: fundamentals and lessons learned in requirements engineering. In: International conference on model driven engineering languages and systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 183–197 Méndez Fernández D, Penzenstadler B (2015) Artefact-based requirements engineering: the Amdire approach. Requir Eng 20(4):405–434 Méndez Fernández D, Wieringa R (2013) Improving requirements engineering by artefact orientation. In: International conference on product focused software process improvement. Springer, Berlin, pp 108–122 Sharp H, Finkelstein A, Galal G (1999) Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In: Proceedings. Tenth international workshop on database and expert systems applications. DEXA 99. IEEE, pp 387–391 Zhao L, Alhoshan W, Ferrari A, Letsholo KJ, Ajagbe MA, Chioasca E-V, Batista-Navarro RT (2021) Natural language processing for requirements engineering: a systematic mapping study. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54(3):1–41 McElreath R (2020) Statistical rethinking: a Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton Dybå T, Sjøberg DI, Cruzes DS (2012) What works for whom, where, when, and why? On the role of context in empirical software engineering. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pp 19–28 Briand L, Bianculli D, Nejati S, Pastore F, Sabetzadeh M (2017) The case for context-driven software engineering research: generalizability is overrated. IEEE Softw 34(5):72–75 Montgomery L, Lüders C, Maalej W (2022) An alternative issue tracking dataset of public jira repositories. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 73–77