Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Oxman, 1994, Users’ guides to the medical literature, JAMA, 272, 1367, 10.1001/jama.1994.03520170077040
Swingler, 2003, Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis, BMJ, 327, 1083, 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1083
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Randomized controlled trials registration/application checklist. December 2006. Accessed at www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/rct_reg_e.pdf on 19 May 2009.
Mulrow, 1987, The medical review article: state of the science, Ann Intern Med, 106, 485, 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485
Sacks, 1987, Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, N Engl J Med, 316, 450, 10.1056/NEJM198702193160806
Sacks, 1996, Meta-analysis: an update, Mt Sinai J Med, 63, 216
Moher, 1999, Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement, Lancet, 354, 1896, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Green, 2005, Glossary
Strech, 2008, Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence, J Clin Epidemiol, 61, 521, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.001
Moher, 2006, Systematic reviews: when is an update an update, Lancet, 367, 881, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68358-X
University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2009. Accessed at www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ on 19 May 2009.
The Joanna Briggs Institute protocols & work in progress. 2009. Accessed at www.joannabriggs.edu.au/pubs/systematic_reviews_prot.php on 19 May 2009.
De Angelis, 2004, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [Editorial], CMAJ, 171, 606, 10.1503/cmaj.1041281
Whittington, 2004, Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data, Lancet, 363, 1341, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16043-1
Bagshaw, 2006, Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence, Arch Intern Med, 166, 161, 10.1001/archinte.166.2.161
Biondi-Zoccai, 2006, Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study, BMJ, 332, 202, 10.1136/bmj.38693.516782.7C
Liberati, 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 151
Altman, 2001, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 134, 663, 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
Bossuyt, 2003, Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 138, W1, 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
Vandenbroucke, 2007, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 147, W163, 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1
Moher, 2007, Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews, PLoS Med, 4, e78, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078
Bhandari, 2001, Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A, 15, 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00003
Kelly, 2001, Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature, Ann Emerg Med, 38, 518, 10.1067/mem.2001.115881
Richards, 2004, The quality of systematic reviews in dentistry, Evid Based Dent, 5, 17, 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400242
Choi, 2001, Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews, Anesth Analg, 92, 700, 10.1213/00000539-200103000-00029
Delaney, 2005, A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature, Crit Care, 9, R575, 10.1186/cc3803
Dickersin, 2005, Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm, Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis—Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, 11
Sutton, 2005, Evidence concerning the consequences of publication and related biases, Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis—Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, 175
Ladabaum, 2001, Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer, Ann Intern Med, 135, 769, 10.7326/0003-4819-135-9-200111060-00007
Deeks, 2001, Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests, BMJ, 323, 157, 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157
Altman, 2001, Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables, BMJ, 323, 224, 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224
Ioannidis, 2001, Replication validity of genetic association studies, Nat Genet, 29, 306, 10.1038/ng749
Lavis, 2005, Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, 35, 10.1258/1355819054308549
Stewart, 1995, Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data, 14, 2057
Moja, 2005, Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study, BMJ, 330, 1053, 10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F
Guyatt, 2008, GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, 336, 924, 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Schünemann, 2006, ATS Documents Development and Implementation Committee. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 174, 605, 10.1164/rccm.200602-197ST
Chan, 2004, Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles, JAMA, 291, 2457, 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
Chan, 2004, Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, CMAJ, 171, 735, 10.1503/cmaj.1041086