Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Tóm tắt
Editor's Note: PTJ's Editorial Board has adopted PRISMA to help PTJ better communicate research to physical therapists. For more, read Chris Maher's editorial starting on page 870.
Membership of the PRISMA Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.
This article has been reprinted with permission from the Annals of Internal Medicine from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. Available at: http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/151/4/264. The authors jointly hold copyright of this article. This article has also been published in PLoS Medicine, BMJ, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, and Open Medicine.
Copyright © 2009 Moher et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Oxman, 1994, Users’ guides to the medical literature, JAMA, 272, 1367, 10.1001/jama.1994.03520170077040
Swingler, 2003, Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis, BMJ, 327, 1083, 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1083
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Randomized controlled trials registration/application checklist. December 2006. Accessed at www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/rct_reg_e.pdf on 19 May 2009.
Mulrow, 1987, The medical review article: state of the science, Ann Intern Med, 106, 485, 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485
Sacks, 1987, Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, N Engl J Med, 316, 450, 10.1056/NEJM198702193160806
Sacks, 1996, Meta-analysis: an update, Mt Sinai J Med, 63, 216
Moher, 1999, Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement, Lancet, 354, 1896, 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Green, 2005, Glossary
Strech, 2008, Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence, J Clin Epidemiol, 61, 521, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.001
Moher, 2006, Systematic reviews: when is an update an update, Lancet, 367, 881, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68358-X
University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2009. Accessed at www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ on 19 May 2009.
The Joanna Briggs Institute protocols & work in progress. 2009. Accessed at www.joannabriggs.edu.au/pubs/systematic_reviews_prot.php on 19 May 2009.
De Angelis, 2004, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [Editorial], CMAJ, 171, 606, 10.1503/cmaj.1041281
Whittington, 2004, Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data, Lancet, 363, 1341, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16043-1
Bagshaw, 2006, Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence, Arch Intern Med, 166, 161, 10.1001/archinte.166.2.161
Biondi-Zoccai, 2006, Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study, BMJ, 332, 202, 10.1136/bmj.38693.516782.7C
Liberati, 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 151
Altman, 2001, CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 134, 663, 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
Bossuyt, 2003, Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 138, W1, 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
Vandenbroucke, 2007, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 147, W163, 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1
Moher, 2007, Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews, PLoS Med, 4, e78, 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078
Bhandari, 2001, Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A, 15, 10.2106/00004623-200101000-00003
Kelly, 2001, Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature, Ann Emerg Med, 38, 518, 10.1067/mem.2001.115881
Richards, 2004, The quality of systematic reviews in dentistry, Evid Based Dent, 5, 17, 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400242
Choi, 2001, Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews, Anesth Analg, 92, 700, 10.1213/00000539-200103000-00029
Delaney, 2005, A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature, Crit Care, 9, R575, 10.1186/cc3803
Dickersin, 2005, Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm, Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis—Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, 11
Sutton, 2005, Evidence concerning the consequences of publication and related biases, Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis—Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, 175
Ladabaum, 2001, Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer, Ann Intern Med, 135, 769, 10.7326/0003-4819-135-9-200111060-00007
Deeks, 2001, Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests, BMJ, 323, 157, 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157
Altman, 2001, Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables, BMJ, 323, 224, 10.1136/bmj.323.7306.224
Ioannidis, 2001, Replication validity of genetic association studies, Nat Genet, 29, 306, 10.1038/ng749
Lavis, 2005, Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, 35, 10.1258/1355819054308549
Stewart, 1995, Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data, 14, 2057
Moja, 2005, Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study, BMJ, 330, 1053, 10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F
Guyatt, 2008, GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, BMJ, 336, 924, 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Schünemann, 2006, ATS Documents Development and Implementation Committee. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 174, 605, 10.1164/rccm.200602-197ST
Chan, 2004, Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles, JAMA, 291, 2457, 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
Chan, 2004, Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, CMAJ, 171, 735, 10.1503/cmaj.1041086