Representation of shared surface information and false memory for abstract versus concrete pictures in the conjoint recognition paradigm
Tóm tắt
An effective factor by which false memories can arise is relatedness which includes not only semantic associations but also perceptual resemblance. This issue raises questions about how patterns of perceptual features are represented in memory and how they relate to semantic representations. In five experiments, we investigated the memory processes underlying the false recognition of perceptually or semantically related pictures from the perspective of fuzzy trace theory. Multinomial processing tree model analyses for the conjoint recognition paradigm showed that the parameter representing gist trace retrieval not only contributes to false acceptances of semantically related pictures, but also underlies the false recognition of non-semantically related abstract shapes. These results challenged the hypothesis that the false recognition of non-semantically related distractors is solely due to interference with the verbatim suppression process. These experiments also showed that adding a surface feature (colour) to the category exemplars increases false recognition of related distractors by enhancing the contribution of the familiarity process, but only for pictures of real objects. Comparisons between experiments showed that different variants of the conjoint recognition model, used to analyse the effects of the same experimental manipulation, can lead to partially different conclusions.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arndt, J. (2010). The role of memory activation in creating false memories of encoding context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 66–79.
Arndt, J. (2015). The influence of forward and backward associative strength on false memories for encoding context. Memory, 23, 1093–1111.
Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371–391.
Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 1–15.
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., Quinlan, P. T., Bowes, L., & Stone, R. (2016). Doors for memory: A searchable database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2111–2118.
Ball, B. H., DeWitt, M. R., Knight, J. B., & Hicks, J. L. (2014). Encoding and retrieval processes involved in the access of source information in the absence of item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1271–1286.
Ballardini, N., Yamashita, J. A., & Wallace, W. P. (2008). Presentation duration and false recall for semantic and phonological associates. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 64–71.
Ballou, M. R., & Sommers, M. S. (2008). Similar phenomena, different mechanisms: Semantic and phonological false memories are produced by independent mechanisms. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1450–1459.
Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 57–86.
Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197–215.
Bowman, C. R., Chamberlain, J. D., & Dennis, N. A. (2019). Sensory representations supporting memory specificity: Age effects on behavioral and neural discriminability. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 2265–2275.
Brainerd, C. J., Bialer, D. M., & Chang, M. (2022a). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory: Meta-analysis of conjoint recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48, 1680–1697.
Brainerd, C. J., Bialer, D. M., Chang, M., & Upadhyay, P. (2022b). A fundamental asymmetry in human memory: Old ≠ Not-New and New ≠ Not-Old. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48, 1850–1867.
Brainerd, C. J., Gomes, C. F. A., & Moran, R. (2014). The two recollections. Psychological Review, 121, 563–599.
Brainerd, C. J., Gomes, C. F. A., & Nakamura, K. (2015). Dual recollection in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 816–843.
Brainerd, C. J., Nakamura, K., Chang, M., & Bialer, D. M. (2019). Super-overdistribution. Journal of Memory and Language, 108, 104027.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10, 3–47.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164–169.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Aydin, C. (2010). Remembering in contradictory minds: Disjunction fallacies in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 711–735.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Brandse, E. (1995a). Are children’s false memories more persistent than their true memories? Psychological Science, 6, 359–364.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995b). False-recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157–185.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review, 106, 160–179.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review, 110, 762–784.
Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 307–327.
Bröder, A., & Meiser, T. (2007). Measuring source memory. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/journal of Psychology, 215, 52–60.
Brainerd, C. J., Chang, M., & Bialer, D. M. (2020). From association to gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 2106–2127.
Chang, M., & Brainerd, C. J. (2021). Semantic and phonological false memory: A review of theory and data. Journal of Memory and Language, 119, 104210.
Chen, X. R., Gomes, C. F. A., & Brainerd, C. J. (2018). Explaining recollection without remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1921–1930.
Cowell, R. A., Barense, M. D., & Sadil, P. S. (2019). A Roadmap for understanding memory: Decomposing cognitive processes into operations and representations. Eneuro, 6, ENEURO.0122-19.2019.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.
Dennis, S., & Chapman, A. (2010). The inverse list length effect: A challenge for pure exemplar models of recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 416–424.
Erdfelder, E., Auer, T., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/journal of Psychology, 217, 108–124.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Finley, J. R., Sungkhasettee, V. W., Roediger, H. L., & Balota, D. A. (2017). Relative contributions of semantic and phonological associates to over-additive false recall in hybrid DRM lists. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 154–168.
Franks, B. A., Butler, K. M., & Bishop, J. (2016). The effects of study order and backward associative strength on illusory recollection: A source-strength effect does not always occur. Memory, 24, 154–164.
Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 120–128.
Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. Psychology Press.
Garoff-Eaton, R. J., Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition. Learning and Memory, 14, 684–692.
Gong, X., Xiao, H., & Wang, D. (2016). Emotional valence of stimuli modulates false recognition: Using a modified version of the simplified conjoint recognition paradigm. Cognition, 156, 95–105.
Henkel, L. A., & Franklin, N. (1998). Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects. Memory and Cognition, 26, 659–673.
Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251–268.
Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2002). Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 807–815.
Hicks, J. L., & Starns, J. J. (2006). The roles of associative strength and source memorability in the contextualization of false memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 39–53.
Holliday, R. E., & Weekes, B. S. (2006). Dissociated developmental trajectories for semantic and phonological false memories. Memory, 14, 624–636.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.
JASP Team. (2019). JASP (Version 0.16) (Computer software). https://jasp-stats.org/.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., & Leach, K. (1988). The consequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice. Memory and Cognition, 16, 337–342.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
Kinnell, A., & Dennis, S. (2012). The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 40, 311–325.
Kouststaal, W., Reddy, C., Jackson, E. M., Prince, S., Cendan, D. L., & Schacter, D. L. (2003). False recognition of abstract versus common objects in older and younger adults: Testing the semantic categorization account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 499–510.
Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., Brenner, C., & Jackson, E. M. (1999). Perceptually based false recognition of novel objects in amnesia: Effects of category size and similarity to category prototypes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 317–341.
Lyle, K., & Johnson, M. (2006). Importing perceived features into false memories. Memory, 14, 197–213.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 314–324.
Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54.
Naspi, L., Hoffman, P., Devereux, B., Thejll-Madsen, T., Doumas, L. A. A., & Morcom, A. (2021). Multiple dimensions of semantic and perceptual similarity contribute to mnemonic discrimination for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1903–1923.
Nieznański, M. (2020). Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103127.
Nieznański, M., & Obidziński, M. (2019). Verbatim and gist memory and individual differences in inhibition, sustained attention, and working memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31, 16–33.
Nieznański, M., & Obidziński, M. (2022). Closing the door to false memory: The effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 86, 968–982.
Nieznański, M., Obidziński, M., Niedziałkowska, D., & Zyskowska, E. (2018). Context recollection and false memory of critical lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: The role of encoding- and retrieval-based mechanisms. Psihologijske Teme/psychological Topics, 27, 365–384.
Nieznański, M., Obidziński, M., Niedziałkowska, D., & Zyskowska, E. (2019). False memory for orthographically related words: Research in the simplified conjoint recognition paradigm. American Journal of Psychology, 132, 57–69.
Oliva, A. (2005). Gist of the scene. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 251–256). Academic Press.
Pidgeon, L. M., & Morcom, A. M. (2014). Age-related increases in false recognition: The role of perceptual and conceptual similarity. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 283.
Reyna, V. F., Corbin, J. C., Weldon, R. B., & Brainerd, C. J. (2016). How fuzzy-trace theory predicts true and false memories for words, sentences, and narratives. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 1–9.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Distortions of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 149–162). Oxford University Press.
Ross, D. A., Sadil, P., Wilson, D. M., & Cowell, R. A. (2018). Hippocampal engagement during recall depends on memory content. Cerebral Cortex, 28, 2685–2698.
Sadil, P., Potter, K. W., Huber, D. E., & Cowell, R. A. (2019). Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1058–1070.
Slotnick, S. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 664–672.
Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2008). A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 570–586.
Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). Measuring phantom recollection in the simplified conjoint recognition paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 180–193.
Toglia, M. P., Neuschatz, J. S., & Goodwin, K. A. (1999). Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less. Memory, 7, 233–256.
Tse, C.-S., Li, Y., & Neill, W. T. (2011). Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger–McDermott paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 137, 269–279.
Watson, J. M., Balota, D. A., & Roediger, H. L. (2003). Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 95–118.