Renal recipients’ knowledge and self-efficacy during first year after implementing an evidence based educational intervention as routine care at the transplantation clinic
Tóm tắt
Following an implementation plan based on dynamic dialogue between researchers and clinicians, this study implemented an evidence-based patient education program (tested in an RCT) into routine care at a clinical transplant center. The aim of this study was to investigate renal recipients’ knowledge and self-efficacy during first year the after the intervention was provided in an everyday life setting. The study has a longitudinal design. The sample consisted of 196 renal recipients. Measurement points were 5 days (baseline), 2 months (T1), 6 months (T2), and one-year post transplantation (T3). Outcome measures were post-transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-perceived general health. No statistically significant changes were found from baseline to T1, T2, and T3. Participants’ levels of knowledge and self-efficacy were high prior to the education program and did not change throughout the first year post transplantation. Renal recipients self-efficacy and insight in post-transplant aspects seem to be more robust when admitted to the hospital for transplantation compared to baseline observations in the RCT study. This may explain why the implemented educational intervention did not lead to the same positive increase in outcome measures as in the RCT. This study supports that replicating clinical interventions in real-life settings may provide different results compared to results from RCT’s. In order to gain a complete picture of the impacts of an implemented intervention, it is vital also to evaluate results after implementing findings from RCT-studies into everyday practice.
Tài liệu tham khảo
K.H. Bertelsen, K. Rasmussen, M.S. Ludvigsen, J. Finderup, Experiences of recipients and living donors the first three days after kidney transplantation, J. Renal Care 41 (2015) 195–201.
A. Boaz, M. Morgan, Working to establish “normality” post transplant: a qualitative study of kidney transplant patients, Chron. Illness 10 (2014) 247–58.
P. Gill, Stressors and coping mechanisms in live-related renal transplantation, J. Clin. Nursing 21 (2012) 1622–31.
K.H. Urstad, M.H. Andersen, O. Øyen, T. Moum, A.K. Wahl, Patients’ level of knowledge measured five days after kidney transplantation, Clin. Transplant 25 (2011) 646–52.
K.H. Urstad, A.K. Wahl, M.H. Andersen, O. Øyen, M.S. Fagermoen, Renal recipients’ educational experiences in the early post-operative phase—a qualitative study, Scand. J. Caring Sci. 26 (2012) 635–42.
B.A. Young, Health literacy in nephrology: why is it important? Am. J. Kidney Dis. 62 (2013) 3–6.
L.A. Dageforde, K.L. Cavanaugh, Health literacy: emerging evidence and applications in kidney disease care, Adv. Chron. Kidney Dis. 20 (2013) 311–19.
K.H. Urstad, M.H. Andersen, O. Øyen, T. Moum, A.K. Wahl, The effect of an educational intervention for renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial, Clin. Tra nsplant 26 (2012) E246–E53.
Miller TA, DiMatteo MR. Communication, in: B.A. Bensadon (Ed.) Psychology and Geriatrics. Academic Press; 2015.
Young YA, Tordoff AJ, Smith A. What do patients want? ‘Tailoring medicines information to meet patients’’ needs. Res Soc Admin Pharm. 2016;26:S1551–7411.
Svavarsdóttir MH, Sigurdardottir AK, Steinsbekk A. What is a good educator? A qualitative study on the perspective of individuals with coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;15:513–52.
Driscoll A, Davidson P, Clark R, et al. Tailoring consumer resources to enhance self-care in chronic heart failure. Aust Crit Care. 2009;22:133–40.
Burton JH, Marshall JM, Munro P, et al. Rehabilitation and transition after lung transplantation in children. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:296–99.
Clark N, Lachance L, Milanovich AF, et al. Characteristics of successful asthma programs. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:797–805.
Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:673–93.
E. Engebretsen, M.H. Andersen, K.H. Urstad, A.K. Wahl, Action research in implementation and evaluation. Outline of a study of a training programme for kidney transplant recipients, in: Theory and Methodology in International Comparative Classroom Studies, Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo, 2014, pp. 256–66.
I.D. Graham, J. Tetroe, Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation, Acad. Emerg. Med. 14(11) (2007) 936–41.
K.A. McKibbon, C. Lokker, N.L. Wilczynski, D. Ciliska, M. Dobbins, D.A. Davis, R.B. Haynes, S.E. Straus, A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel? Implement. Sci.12 (2010) 5–16.
U. von Thiele Schwarz, H. Hasson, P. Lindfors, Applying a fidelity framework to adaptations in an occupational health intervention, Work. 51 (2015) 195–203.
Backer TE. Finding the balance: program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: a state-of-the-art review. Rockville: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; 2002. https://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/FindingBalance1.pdf. (accessed 7 February 2020).
L. Dusenbury, R. Brannigan, W.B. Hansen, J. Walsh, M. Falco, Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions, Health Edu. Res. 20 (2005) 308–13.
C. Carroll, M. Patterson, S. Wood, A. Booth, J. Rick, S. Balain, A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity, Implement. Sci. 2 (2007) 2–40.
T. Greenhalgh, S. Wieringa, Is it time to drop the “knowledge translation” metaphor? A critical literature review. J. R. Soc. Med. 104(12) (2011) 501–9.
T. Greenhalgh, G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, O. Kyriakidou, Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 82 (2004) 581–629.
V. Ward, A. House, S. Hamer, Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 14(3) (2009) 156–64.
H. Davies, S. Nutley, I. Walter, Why “knowledge transfer” is misconceived for applied social research, J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 13(3) (2008) 188–90.
I. Lillehagen, M.H. Andersen, K.H. Urstad, E. Engebretsen, How does a new patient education programme for renal recipients become situated and adapted when implemented in the daily teaching practice in a university hospital? An ethnographic observation study. BMJ Open 8 (2018) e023005.
M.H. Andersen, A.K. Wahl, E. Engebretsen, K.H. Urstad, Implementing a tailored education programme: renal transplant recipients’ experiences, J. Renal Care 45(2) (2019) 111–19.
K.H. Urstad, A.K. Wahl, E. Engebretsen, M.H. Larsen, T.K. Vidnes, A.G.K. Stenwig, Ø.W. Simensen, A. Nordli, A.V. Reisæter, M.H. Andersen, Implementation of a new patient education programme for renal transplant recipients. J. Renal Care 44 (2018) 106–14.
S.B. Soumerai, J. Avorn, Principles of educational outreach (“academic detailing”) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA 263(4) (1990) 549–56.
A. Bandura, Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press, New York, 1977.
J. Katz, A. Wandersman, R.M. Goodman, S. Griffin, D.K. Wilson, M. Schillaci, Updating the FORECAST formative evaluation approach and some implications for ameliorating theory failure, implementation failure, and evaluation failure, Eval. Prog. Plan 39 (2013) 42–50.
Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnson M, (Eds.). Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio, Causal and Control Beliefs. Nfer-Nelson, Windsor, 1995, pp. 35–37
Røysamb E, Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Norwegian version of the general perceived self-efficacy scale. 1999. www.userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/selfscal.htm. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.
Cunny KA, Perri M III. Single-item vs multiple-item measures of health-related quality of life. Psychol Rep. 1991;69(1):127–30.
Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1069–76.
US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network https://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2016_ADR_Preview.aspx. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.
Tomlinson M, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Swartz L, Tsai AC. Scaling up mHealth: where is the evidence? PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001382.
Theobald S, Brandes N, Gyapong M, El-Saharty S, Proctor E, Diaz T, Wanji S, Elloker S, Raven J, Elsey H, Bharal S, Pelletier D, Peters DH. Implementation research: new imperatives and opportunities in global health. The Lancet. 2018;392(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32205-0. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
Wray, Advances in the anesthetic management of solid organ transplantation. Adv. Anesth. 35 (2017) 95–117.
Baker, R.J., Mark, P.B., Patel, R.K. et al. Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient. BMC Nephrol 18 (2017) 174.
Nowacki M, Nazarewski Ł, Kloskowski T, Tyloch D, Pokrywczyńska M, Pietkun K, Drewa T. Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Archives of Medical Science. 2016;12(5):1158–73.
D’Egidio V, Mannocci A, Ciaccio D, Sestili C, Cocchiara RA, Del Cimmuto A, La Torre G. Return to work after kidney transplant: a systematic review, Occup Med. 2019;69(6):412–8.
Thompson D. Replication of Randomized, Controlled Trials Using Real-World Data: What Could Go Wrong?. Value in Health; 2021;24(1):112–5.
Yan, L., Yan, X., Tan, Y. and Sun, S.X. Shared Minds: How Patients Use Collaborative Information Sharing via Social Media Platforms. Prod Oper Manag, 28 (2019) 9–26.
Tan SSL, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Int Res. 2017;19(1):e9.
Sundell K, Beelmann A, Hasson H, von Thiele Schwarz U. Novel programs, international adoptions, or contextual adaptations? Meta-analytical results from German and Swedish intervention research. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1020540.
Hall GE, Hord SM. Implementing change: patterns, principles, potholes. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2001
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655.
Niedermann, K., Fransen, J., Knols, R. and Uebelhart, D. Gap between short- and long-term effects of patient education in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A systematic review. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 51 (2004) 388–398.