Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Đa dạng tôn giáo giảm số lượng các đảng tôn giáo theo thời gian
Tóm tắt
Mặc dù có sự thế tục hóa, ngày càng có sự công nhận rằng một số đảng tôn giáo vẫn tiếp tục ảnh hưởng đến các cuộc bầu cử và sự hình thành chính sách ở một số quốc gia. Điều gì giải thích tại sao các đảng tôn giáo tồn tại ở một số quốc gia nhưng không ở những quốc gia khác? Nghiên cứu này kiểm tra một lập luận cho rằng sự đa dạng tôn giáo thúc đẩy hợp tác chính trị và do đó giảm số lượng các đảng tôn giáo. Sử dụng một bộ dữ liệu về các đảng tôn giáo ở các nền dân chủ công nghiệp tiên tiến từ năm 1945 đến 2011, bài báo này phân tích lập luận này và phát hiện ra rằng sự đa dạng tôn giáo tạo áp lực giảm xuống số lượng các đảng tôn giáo theo thời gian.
Từ khóa
#đa dạng tôn giáo #đảng tôn giáo #chính trị #hợp tác chính trị #bầu cử #chính sách #dân chủTài liệu tham khảo
Alesina, A., A. Devleeschauwer, W. Easterly, S. Kurlat, and R. Wacziarg. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–194.
Amorim Neto, O., and G.W. Cox. 1997. Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 149–174.
Anckar, C. 2000. Size and party system fragmentation. Party Politics 6 (3): 305–328.
Arzheimer, K., and E. Carter. 2009. Christian religiosity and voting for West European radical right parties. West European Politics 32 (5): 985–1011.
Berger, P.L. 1963. A market model for the analysis of ecumenicity. Social Research 30 (1): 77–93.
Best, R. 2011. The declining electoral relevance of traditional cleavage groups. European Political Science Review 3 (2): 279–300.
Bolleyer, N. 2013. New parties in old party systems: Persistence and decline in seventeen democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bormann, N.-C., and M. Golder. 2013. Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies 32 (2): 360–369.
Brown, D., and P. James. 2019. Religious characteristics of states dataset project—Demographics, version 2.0 (RCS-Dem 2.0), countries only. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/7sr4m.
Bruce, S. 2002. God is dead: Secularisation in the west. Oxford: Blackwell.
Budde, E., S. Heichel, S. Hurka, and C. Knill. 2018. Partisan effects in morality policy making. European Journal of Political Research 57 (2): 427–449.
Chhibber, P., and K. Kollman. 2004. The formation of national party systems: Federalism and party competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clark, W.R., and M. Golder. 2006. Rehabilitating Duverger’s theory: Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. Comparative Political Studies 39 (6): 679–708.
Cox, G.W. 1997. Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Döring, H., and P. Manow. 2019. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Development version. http://www.parlgov.org/. Accessed 12 Nov 2019.
Emanuele, V. 2015. Dataset of electoral volatility and its internal components in Western Europe (1945–2015). Rome: Italian Center for Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.7802/1112. Accessed 12 Nov 2019.
Engeli, I., C. Green-Pedersen, and L.T. Larsen. 2012. Morality politics in Western Europe: Parties, agendas and policy choices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ertman, T. 2009. Western European party systems and the religious cleavage. In Religion, class coalitions, and welfare states, ed. K. Van Kersbergen and P. Manow, 39–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Euchner, E.-M. 2019. Morality politics in a secular Age: Strategic parties and divided governments in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fearon, J.D. 2003. Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 195–222.
Ferris, J.S., and M.-C. Voia. 2018. Political parties in Canada: What determines entry, exit and the duration of their lives? Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818793659.
Fink, S. 2008. Politics as usual or bringing religion back in? The influence of parties, institutions, economic interests, and religion on embryo research laws. Comparative Political Studies 41 (12): 1631–1656.
Finke, R., and R. Stark. 1988. Religious economies and sacred canopies: Religious mobilization in American cities, 1906. American Sociological Review 53 (1): 41–49.
Franklin, M., T. Mackie, and H. Valen (eds.). 1992. Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in western countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gaines, B.J. 1999. Duverger’s law and the meaning of Canadian exceptionalism. Comparative Political Studies 32 (7): 835–861.
Gill, A. 1998. Rendering Unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the State in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gill, A. 2005. The political origins of religious liberty: A theoretical outline. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 1: 1–34.
Gill, A. 2017. Christian democracy without romance: The Perils of religious politics from a public choice perspective. Perspectives on Political Science 46 (1): 35–42.
Giorgi, A. 2013. Ahab and the white whale: The contemporary debate around the forms of Catholic political commitment in Italy. Democratization 20 (5): 895–916.
Helbling, H. 1995. The Church. In The New Switzerland: Problems and policies, ed. R. Kiesar and K.R. Spillmann, 298–309. Palo Alto: The Society for the Promotion of Science and Scholarship.
Iannaccone, L.R. 1998. Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (3): 1465–1495.
Iannaccone, L.R., R. Finke, and R. Stark. 1997. Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state. Economic Inquiry 35 (2): 350–364.
Kalyvas, S.N. 1996. The rise of Christian democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Langsæther, P.E. 2019. Religious voting and moral traditionalism: The moderating role of party characteristics. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102095.
Mantilla, L.F. 2019. Feed the Church, starve the party? Church-state relations and religious political mobilisation in 21 Catholic-majority countries. Religion, State & Society 47 (1): 87–103.
Maoz, Z., and E.A. Henderson. 2013. The world religion dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, estimates, and trends. International Interactions 39 (3): 265–291.
Marshall, M.G., and K. Jaggers. 2019. Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2018. Polity IV Project. https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html. Accessed 4 Feb 2020.
McCleary, R.M. 2017. Religion adherence data. https://scholar.harvard.edu/mccleary/data-sets. Accessed 31 July 2019.
McRoberts, O.M. 1999. Understanding the “new” black Pentecostal activism: Lessons from ecumenical urban ministries in Boston. Sociology of Religion 60 (1): 47–70.
Miller, K.D. 2002. Competitive strategies of religious organizations. Strategic Management Journal 23 (5): 435–456.
Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ozzano, L. 2013. The many faces of the political god: A typology of religiously oriented parties. Democratization 20 (5): 807–830.
Ozzano, L. 2019. Religion, cleavages, and right-wing populist parties: The Italian case. The Review of Faith & International Affairs 17 (1): 65–77.
Ozzano, L., and F. Cavatorta. 2013. Introduction: Religiously oriented parties and democratization. Democratization 20 (5): 799–806.
Powell, E.N., and J.A. Tucker. 2013. Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: New data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123–147.
Putnam, R.D., and D.E. Campbell. 2010. American grace: How religion divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rashkova, E.R. 2014. Ethnic heterogeneity and party system size: A district-level analysis. Comparative European Politics 12 (3): 249–278.
Raymond, C.D. 2016. Not all social cleavages are the same: On the relationship between religious diversity and party system fragmentation. Politics and Religion 9 (2): 364–388.
Raymond, C.D. 2019. Religious diversity and the number of religious parties around the world. Representation 55 (2): 197–213.
Rosenblum, N.L. 2003. Religious parties, religious political identity, and the cold shoulder of liberal democratic thought. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (1): 23–53.
Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2002. Beyond church and sect: dynamics and stability of religious economies. In Sacred markets, sacred canopies: Essays on religious markets and religious Pluralism, ed. T.G. Jelen, 31–62. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Stark, R., and L.R. Iannaccone. 1994. A supply-side reinterpretation of the “secularization” of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33 (3): 230–252.
Tamney, J.B., and S.D. Johnson. 1990. Religious diversity and ecumenical social action. Review of Religious Research 32 (1): 16–26.
van de Ven, A.H. 1976. On the nature, formation, and maintenance of relations among organizations. The Academy of Management Review 1 (4): 24–36.
Volkens, A., W. Krause, P. Lehmann, T. Matthieß, N. Merz, S. Regel, and B. Weßels. 2018. The Manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2018b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2018b. Accessed 31 Mar 2020.
von Beyme, K. 1985. Political parties in Western democracies. Aldershot: Gower.
Wagner, M.B. 1997. The demise of denominationalism in christian schools. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36 (1): 13–24.
Watling, T. 2001. A new reformation for a ‘secularised’ world? Retaining ‘tradition’ while accommodating ‘change’. The Dialectics of the Ecumenical Movement in the Netherlands’, Journal of Contemporary Religion 16 (1): 85–104.
World Bank. 2019. World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/data/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD/1ff4a498/Popular-Indicators#. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.
