Religious Belief and Freedom of Expression: Is Offensiveness Really the Issue?

Peter Jones1
1School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cram, Ian. 2009. The Danish cartoons, offensive expression, and democratic legitimacy. In Extreme speech and democracy, ed. Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, 311–330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, Anthony. 1984. Offense and the liberal conception of the law. Philosophy & Public Affairs 13(1): 3–23.

Feinberg, Joel. 1985. Offense to others. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hart, H.L.A. 1963. Law, liberty and morality. London: Oxford University Press.

Jones, Peter. 1990. Respecting beliefs and rebuking Rushdie. British Journal of Political Science 20(4): 415–437.

Keane, David. 2008. Cartoon violence and freedom of expression. Human Rights Quarterly 30(4): 845–875.

Laegaard, Sune. 2007a. The cartoon controversy: Offence, identity, oppression? Political Studies 55(3): 481–498.

Laegaard, Sune. 2007b. The cartoon controversy as a case of multicultural recognition. Contemporary Politics 13(2): 147–164.

Mill, J.S. 1974. In On liberty, ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb. Harmondsworth: Penguin

Rostbøll, Christian F. 2009. Autonomy, respect and arrogance in the Danish cartoon controversy. Political Theory 37(5): 623–648.

Simester, A.P., and Andrew von Hirsch. 2002. Rethinking the offense principle. Legal Theory 8(3): 269–295.