Reliability and interexaminer agreement for induced tropia test: is normal always normal?

International Ophthalmology - Tập 37 - Trang 615-618 - 2016
Kadriye Erkan Turan1, Hande Taylan Sekeroglu1, Sevilay Karahan2, Ali Sefik Sanac1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
2Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the fixation preference testing with 10 and 20 diopter prisms (Δ) in children without strabismus in order to extrapolate its utility to preverbal children and to determine interexaminer agreement. Fourty children (24 girls, 16 boys) aged between 5 and 16 years with normal ophthalmological examination except refractive errors were included in the study. The visual acuity, refractive errors, and orthoptic findings were recorded. The base-down prism fixation test was performed by two experienced examiners with 10Δ and 20Δ. The presence of corrective movement was recorded as positive result separately for each eye. Best-corrected visual acuity was 1.0 bilaterally for all patients. All patients had binocular single vision and stereopsis. First examiner noted bilateral fixation movement in 65 % patients with 10Δ and in 57.5 % with 20Δ, second examiner in 50 % with 10Δ, and in 37.5 % with 20Δ. Interexaminer agreement was 42.5 % for 10Δ and 54.5 % for 20Δ (p < 0.01). Both examiners observed the fixation movement to be less frequent in older children. The fixation movement can be absent or seen asymmetrically even in children with equal visual acuity and binocular vision. The rate of fixation movement seemed to be reduced with age possibly due to increased concentration and cooperation of the child. In addition, there was a remarkable interexaminer variability in both tests. It should be borne in mind that the findings of prism-guided fixation preference tests may be misleading in preverbal children.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Whittaker KW, O’Flynn E, Manners RM (2000) Diagnosis of amblyopia using the 10-diopter fixation test: a proposed modification for patients with unilateral ptosis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 37:21–23 Wright KW, Walonker F, Edelman P (1981) 10-Diopter fixation test for amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 99:1242–1246 Wallace DK (2005) Tests of fixation preference for amblyopia. Am Orthopt J 55:76–81 Koklanis K, Le T, Georgievski Z (2010) The base-to-base induced-tropia prism test for detection of amblyopia: a pilot study. J AAPOS 14:484–487 Wright KW, Edelman PM, Walonker F, Yiu S (1986) Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 104:549–553 Friedman DS, Katz J, Repka MX, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, Tielsch JM (2008) Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 115:1796–1799 Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Song E, Lin J, Borchert M, Azen SP et al (2009) Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors. Ophthalmology 116:145–153