Reliability and Validity of the Subjective Component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scales

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery - Tập 46 Số 2 - Trang 65-74 - 2007
Talal Ibrahim1, Almoghera Beiri, Mohamed Azzabi, Alistair Best, Grahame Taylor, Dipen K. Menon
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kettering General Hospital, United Kingdom.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bellamy, 1988, Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis, J Orthop Rheumatol, 1, 95

Dawson, 1996, Oxford Hip Score: questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement, J Bone Joint Surg, 78-B, 185, 10.1302/0301-620X.78B2.0780185

Söderman, 2001, Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?, Clin Orthop, 384, 189, 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00022

Harcourt, 2001, Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire, J Bone Joint Surg, 83-B, 345, 10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.11298

Liow, 2000, The reliability of the American Knee Society score, Acta Orthop Scand, 71, 603, 10.1080/000164700317362244

Guyton, 2001, Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS Scoring Systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modelling, Foot Ankle Int, 22, 779, 10.1177/107110070102201003

Kitaoka, 1994, Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes, Foot Ankle Int, 15, 349, 10.1177/107110079401500701

Budiman-Mak, 1991, The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability, J Clin Epidemiol, 44, 561, 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4

Agel, 2005, Reliability of the Foot Function Index: a report of the AOFAS Outcomes Committee, Foot Ankle Int, 26, 962, 10.1177/107110070502601112

SooHoo, 2006, Evaluation of the validity of the Foot Function Index in measuring outcomes in patients with foot and ankle disorders, Foot Ankle Int, 27, 38, 10.1177/107110070602700107

Budiman-Mak, 2006, Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index, Foot Ankle Int, 27, 519, 10.1177/107110070602700707

Toolan, 2001, An evaluation of the use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores to assess surgical outcome after elective foot and ankle surgery, Foot Ankle Int, 22, 775, 10.1177/107110070102201002

McHorney, 1993, The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II Psychometric and clinical test of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs, Med Care, 3, 247, 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006

Jenkinson, 1994, Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample, Qual Life Res, 3, 7, 10.1007/BF00647843

SooHoo, 2003, Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS clinical rating systems by correlation to the SF-36, Foot Ankle Int, 24, 50, 10.1177/107110070302400108

Bennett, 1998, Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status, J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 88, 419, 10.7547/87507315-88-9-419

Saag, 1996, The Foot Function Index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability, Foot Ankle Int, 17, 506, 10.1177/107110079601700814

Button, 2004, A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?, Foot Ankle Int, 25, 521, 10.1177/107110070402500802

Lau, 2005, Results of an internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members, Foot Ankle Int, 26, 479, 10.1177/107110070502600609

Engelberg, 1993, Musculoskeletal function assessment instrument: Criterion and construct validity, J Ortho Res, 14, 182, 10.1002/jor.1100140204

Sitzia, 1998, Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies, Int J Qual Health Care, 10, 311, 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311