Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation - Tập 32 Số suppl_2 - Trang ii13-ii18 - 2017
Marlies Noordzij1, Jan van der Meulen2, Fergus Caskey3, Kitty J. Jager1
1ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
3UK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2002, Epidemiology. An Introduction

2007, Measuring disease occurrence, Kidney Int, 72, 412, 10.1038/sj.ki.5002341

2013, When do we need competing risks methods for survival analysis in nephrology?, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 28, 2670, 10.1093/ndt/gft355

2008, The analysis of survival data in nephrology: basic concepts and methods of Cox regression, Kidney Int, 74, 705, 10.1038/ki.2008.294

2013, Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls, Int J Epidemiol, 2, 861

2007, Measures of effect: relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and ‘number needed to treat’, Kidney Int, 72, 789, 10.1038/sj.ki.5002432

2015, Mortality from infections and malignancies in patients treated with renal replacement therapy: data from the ERA-EDTA registry, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 30, 1028, 10.1093/ndt/gfv007

2014, Risk of end-stage renal disease following live kidney donation, JAMA, 311, 579, 10.1001/jama.2013.285141

2017, Prediction versus aetiology: common pitfalls and how to avoid them, Nephrol Dial Transplant, ii1

1994, Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration, BMJ, 309, 761, 10.1136/bmj.309.6957.761

2011, Endpoint selection and relative (versus absolute) risk reporting in published medication trials, J Gen Intern Med, 26, 1246, 10.1007/s11606-011-1813-7

2006, Ratio measures in leading medical journals: structured review of accessibility of underlying absolute risks, BMJ, 333, 1248, 10.1136/bmj.38985.564317.7C

2010, CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials, BMJ, 340, c332, 10.1136/bmj.c332

2010, CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials, BMJ, 340, c869, 10.1136/bmj.c869

2007, The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies, Ann Intern Med, 147, 573, 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010

2007, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 147, W163

2016, Quality of reporting and study design of CKD cohort studies assessing mortality in the elderly before and after STROBE: a systematic review, PloS One, 11, e0155078, 10.1371/journal.pone.0155078