Relationship of ventricular assist device support duration with pediatric heart transplant outcomes

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation - Tập 41 - Trang 61-69 - 2022
Arene Butto1, Chad Y. Mao1, Lydia Wright1, Martha Wetzel2, Michael S. Kelleman2, Michael P. Carboni3, Anne I. Dipchand4, Kenneth R. Knecht5, Zdenka Reinhardt6, Joshua D. Sparks7, Chet Villa8, William T. Mahle1
1Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
2Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
3Duke Children's Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
4Labatt Family Heart Center, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5Arkansas Children's Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
6Freeman Hospital, Thew Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
7University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
8Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

Tài liệu tham khảo

Rossano, 2017, The registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: Twentieth pediatric heart transplantation report-2017; focus theme: Allograft ischemic time, J Heart Lung Transplant, 36, 1060, 10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.018 Morales, 2019, Third annual pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (pedimacs) report: Preimplant characteristics and outcomes, Ann Thorac Surg, 107, 993, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.038 Adachi, 2019, Centrifugal-flow ventricular assist device support in children: A single-center experience, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 157, 1609, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.045 VanderPluym, 2019, Outcomes of children supported with an intracorporeal continuous-flow left ventricular assist system, J Heart Lung Transplant, 38, 385, 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.015 Brown, 2019, Optimal timing for heart transplantation in patients bridged with left ventricular assist devices: Is timing of the essence?, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 157, 2315, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.118 Rosenthal, 2016, Adverse events in children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: Data from the pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support (PediMACS), J Heart Lung Transplant, 35, 569, 10.1016/j.healun.2016.03.005 Lorts, 2018, Outcomes of children supported with devices labeled as “temporary” or short term: A report from the pediatric interagency registry for mechanical circulatory support, J Heart Lung Transplant, 37, 54, 10.1016/j.healun.2017.10.023 Dipchand, 2018, Ventricular assist device support as a bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients, J Am Coll Cardiol, 72, 402, 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.072 Shaddy, 1996, Outcome of cardiac transplantation in children. Survival in a contemporary multi-institutional experience. Pediatric heart transplant study, Circulation: J of the American Heart Assoc, 94, II69 Goldstein, 2016, Assessment of heart transplant waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant failure: a mixed methods approach, Epidemiology, 27, 469, 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000472 Dipchand, 2013, Ten yr of pediatric heart transplantation: a report from the pediatric heart transplant study, Pediatr Transplant, 17, 99, 10.1111/petr.12038 Schowengerdt, 1997, Infection after pediatric heart transplantation: results of a multiinstitutional study. The pediatric heart transplant study group, J Heart Lung Transplant, 16, 1207 Austin, 2015, Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies, Stat Med, 34, 3661, 10.1002/sim.6607 Hernán, 2006, Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data, J Epidemiol Commun Health (1979-), 60, 578, 10.1136/jech.2004.029496 Robins, 2000, Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology, Epidemiology, 11, 550, 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011 Auerbach, 2018, Infectious complications of ventricular assist device use in children in the United States: Data from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs), J Heart Lung Transplant, 37, 46, 10.1016/j.healun.2017.09.013 Sutcliffe, 2018, Post-transplant outcomes in pediatric ventricular assist device patients: a PediMACS-pediatric heart transplant study linkage analysis, J Heart Lung Transplant, 37, 715, 10.1016/j.healun.2017.12.004 Adachi, 2017, Continuous-flow ventricular assist device support in children: a paradigm change, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 154, 1358, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.082 Riggs, 2020, Optimizing postcardiac transplantation outcomes in children with ventricular assist devices: how long should the bridge be?, ASAIO J, 66, 787, 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001075 Bates, 2020, Bivalirudin experience in a heterogeneous ventricular assist device population, ASAIO J, 66, 677, 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001062 Truby, 2018, Ventricular assist device utilization in heart transplant candidates: Nationwide variability and impact on waitlist outcomes, Circ Heart Fail, 11, 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004586 Kitada, 2016, Comparison of early versus delayed timing of left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge-to-transplantation: An analysis of the UNOS dataset, Int J Cardiol, 203, 929, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.009 May, 2016, Impact of ventricular assist device placement on longitudinal renal function in children with end-stage heart failure, J Heart Lung Transplant, 35, 449, 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.039 Grimm, 2016, Duration of left ventricular assist device support does not impact survival after US heart transplantation, Ann Thorac Surg, 102, 1206, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.022 Butto, 2020, The impact of pre-implant illness severity on the outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing durable ventricular assist device, J Heart Lung Transplant, 39, 666, 10.1016/j.healun.2020.02.011