Relationship between left atrium catheter contact force and pacing threshold
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between contact force (CF) and pacing threshold in left atrium (LA). Six to ten LA sites were studied in 28 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Median CF, bipolar and unipolar electrogram voltage, impedance, and bipolar and unipolar thresholds for consistent constant capture and for consistent intermittent capture were measured at each site. Pacing threshold measurements were performed at 188 LA sites. Both unipolar and bipolar pacing thresholds correlated significantly with median CF; however, unipolar pacing threshold correlated better (unipolar: Pearson R −0.45; p < 0.001; Spearman Rho −0.62; p < 0.001, bipolar: Pearson R −0.39; p < 0.001; Spearman Rho −0.52; p < 0.001). Consistent constant capture threshold had better correlation with median CF than consistent intermittent capture threshold for both unipolar and bipolar pacing (Pearson R −0.45; p < 0.001 and Spearman Rho −0.62; p < 0.001 vs. Pearson R −0.35; p < 0.001; Spearman Rho −0.52; p < 0.001). The best pacing threshold cutoff point to detect a good CF (>10 g) was 3.25 mA for unipolar pacing with 69% specificity and 73% sensitivity. Both increased to 80% specificity and 74% sensitivity for sites with normal bipolar voltage and a pacing threshold cutoff value of 2.85 mA. Pacing thresholds correlate with CF in human not previously ablated LA. Since the combination of a normal bipolar voltage and a unipolar pacing threshold <2.85 mA provide reasonable parameters of validity, pacing threshold could be of interest as a surrogate for CF in LA.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Avitall B, Mughal K, Hare J, Helms R, Krum D. The effects of electrode-tissue contact on radiofrequency lesion generation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:2899–910.
Strickberger SA, Vorperian VR, Man KC, Williamson BD, Kalbfleisch SJ, Hasse C, Morady F, Langberg JJ. Relation between impedance and endocardial contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am Heart J. 1994;128:226–9.
Eick OJ, Wittkampf FH, Bronneberg T, Schumacher B. The LETR-principle: a novel method to assess electrode-tissue contact in radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:1180–5.
Di Biase L, Natale A, Barrett C, Tan C, Elayi CS, Ching CK, Wang P, Al-Ahmad A, Arruda M, Burkhardt JD, Wisnoskey BJ, Chowdhury P, De Marco S, Armaganijan L, Litwak KN, Schweikert RA, Cummings JE. Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, “pop-ping,” and char formation: experience with robotic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2009;20:436–440.
Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, Lambert H, Leo G, Aeby N. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1:354–62.
Nakagawa H, Kautzner J, Natale A, Peichl P, Cihak R, Wichterle D, Ikeda A, Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Jackman WM. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:746–53.
Tilz RR, Makimoto H, Lin T, Rillig A, Metzner A, Mathew S, Deiss S, Wissner E, Rausch P, Kamioka M, Heeger C, Kuck KH, Ouyang F. In vivo left-ventricular contact force analysis: comparison of antegrade transseptal with retrograde transaortic mapping strategies and correlation of impedance and electrical amplitude with contact force. Europace. 2014;16:1387–95.
Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H1, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, Sharma T, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–80.
Kumar S, Haqqani HM, Chan M, Lee J, Yudi M, Wong MC, Morton JB, Ling LH, Robinson T, Heck PM, Kelland NF, Halloran K, Spence SJ, Kistler PM, Kalman JM. Predictive value of impedance changes for real-time contact force measurements during catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:962–9.
Knisley SB, Pollard AE, Fast VG. Effects of electrode-myocardial separation on cardiac stimulation in conductive solution. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:1132–43.
Ndrepepa G, Caref EB, Yin H, el-Sherif N, Restivo M. Activation time determination by high-resolution unipolar and bipolar extracellular electrograms in the canine heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:174–88.
Rolf S, Kircher S, Arya A, Eitel C, Sommer P, Richter S, Gaspar T, Bollmann A, Altmann D, Piedra C, Hindricks G, Piorkowski C. Tailored atrial substrate modification based on low-voltage areas in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:825–33.
Kay N, Dosdall DJ, Shepard RB. Cardiac electrical stimulation. In: Ellenbogen K, Kay N, Lau CP, Wilkoff BL, editors. Clinical cardiac pacing. Philadelphia: Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 40–52.
Makimoto H, Lin T, Rillig A, Metzner A, Wohlmuth P, Arya A, Antz M, Mathew S, Deiss S, Wissner E, Rausch P, Bardyszewski A, Kamioka M, Li X, Kuck KH, Ouyang F, Tilz RR. In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:46–54.
Reichlin T, Knecht S, Lane C, Kühne M, Nof E, Chopra N, Tadros TM, Reddy VY, Schaer B, John RM, Osswald S, Stevenson WG, Sticherling C, Michaud GF. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:194–201.
De Bortoli A, Sun LZ, Solheim E, Hoff PI, Schuster P, Ohm OJ, Chen J. Ablation effect indicated by impedance fall is correlated with contact force level during ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1210–5.
Wakili R, Clauss S, Schmidt V, Ulbrich M, Hahnefeld A, Schüssler F, Siebermair J, Kääb S, Estner HL. Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103:97–106.
Eitel C, Hindricks G, Sommer P, Gaspar T, Kircher S, Wetzel U, Dagres N, Esato M, Bollmann A, Husser D, Hilbert S, Zaker-Shahrak R, Arya A, Piorkowski C. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear left atrial ablation as a single-catheter technique to achieve bidirectional conduction block: the pace-and-ablate approach. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:157–64.
Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Nagashima K, Sonoda K, Mano H, Sasaki N, Kogawa R, Takahashi K, Iso K, Ohkubo K, Nakai T, Hirayama A. The effect of standard electrical PV isolation vs. “pace and ablate” on ATP-provoked PV reconnections. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;40:39–45.
Steven D, Sultan A, Reddy V, Luker J, Altenburg M, Hoffmann B, Rostock T, Servatius H, Stevenson WG, Willems S, Michaud GF. Benefit of pulmonary vein isolation guided by loss of pace capture on the ablation line: results from a prospective 2-center randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:44–50.
Steven D, Reddy VY, Inada K, Roberts-Thomson KC, Seiler J, Stevenson WG, Michaud GF. Loss of pace capture on the ablation line: a new marker for complete radiofrequency lesions to achieve pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:323–30.
Soejima K, Stevenson WG, Maisel WH, Sapp JL, Epstein LM. Electrically unexcitable scar mapping based on pacing threshold for identification of the reentry circuit isthmus: feasibility for guiding ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circulation. 2002;106:1678–83.
Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Jais P, Akoum N, Marchlinski F, Kholmovski E, Burgon N, Hu N, Mont L, Deneke T, Duytschaever M, Neumann T, Mansour M, Mahnkopf C, Herweg B, Daoud E, Wissner E, Bansmann P, Brachmann J. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA. 2014;311:498–506.