Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity

American Geophysical Union (AGU) - Tập 111 Số D8 - 2006
Anatoly A. Gitelson1,2, Andrés Viña1,3, Shashi B. Verma2, Donald C. Rundquist1,2, Timothy J. Arkebauer4, Galina Keydan1, Bryan Leavitt1, Verónica Ciganda1,4, George Burba5,2, Andrew E. Suyker2
1Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies University of Nebraska Lincoln Nebraska USA
2School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
3Now at Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
4Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
5Now at LI-COR Biosciences, Inc., Environmental Division, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Tóm tắt

Accurate estimation of spatially distributed CO2 fluxes is of great importance for regional and global studies of carbon balance. We applied a recently developed technique for remote estimation of crop chlorophyll content to assess gross primary production (GPP). The technique is based on reflectance in two spectral channels: the near‐infrared and either the green or the red‐edge. We have found that in irrigated and rainfed crops (maize and soybean), midday GPP is closely related to total crop chlorophyll content. The technique provided accurate estimations of midday GPP in both crops under rainfed and irrigated conditions with root mean square error of GPP estimation of less than 0.3 mg CO2/m2s in maize (GPP ranged from 0 to 3.1 mg CO2/m2s) and less than 0.2 mg CO2/m2s in soybean (GPP ranged from 0 to 1.8 mg CO2/m2s). Validation using an independent data set for irrigated and rainfed maize showed robustness of the technique; RMSE of GPP prediction was less than 0.27 mg CO2/m2s.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.003

10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600020029x

10.1016/0034-4257(92)90070-Z

10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x

10.1126/science.1062962

10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00224-3

10.2307/2401733

10.1007/BF01323458

10.1038/30460

10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00110-7

10.1016/0034-4257(74)90003-0

10.1364/AO.44.000412

10.1080/01431160304984

10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00686.x

10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00102-8

10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00491.x

10.1016/0034-4257(92)90059-S

10.1029/2002GB002023

10.1562/0031-8655(2001)0740038OPANEO2.0.CO2

10.1562/0031-8655(2002)0750272ACCIPL2.0.CO2

10.1078/0176-1617-00887

10.1029/2002GL016450

10.1029/2002GL016543

10.1029/2005GL022688

10.1016/0034-4257(92)90131-3

10.1016/0034-4257(92)90005-5

Jarvis P. G., 1983, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, 233

10.1016/S0034-4257(70)80021-9

10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_2

10.1029/91JD01514

10.1023/A:1012449104831

Minasny B., 2003, FuzME version 3.0

10.2307/2401901

10.1098/rstb.1977.0140

10.1007/BF00122754

10.1038/386698a0

10.1073/pnas.261555198

10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00167-7

10.1034/j.1600-0889.2002.01347.x

10.1029/2004GL019778

10.1016/0034-4257(94)00114-3

10.1029/93JD03221

10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60063-X

10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00007.x

10.1016/j.compag.2003.11.002

10.1007/978-1-4612-1224-9_4

10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:ACSMOG]2.0.CO;2

10.1038/30344

10.1007/BF00120530

10.1080/01431168508948283

10.1016/0034-4257(87)90051-4

10.1016/0034-4257(92)90102-P

10.1007/BF00711707

10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00567.x

10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.01.011

10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.007

10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00573.x

Ustin S. L., 1998, Manual of Remote Sensing: Remote Sensing for the Earth Sciences, 189

10.1080/02757259009532124

10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.003

10.1029/2005GL023647

10.2134/agronj2004.1139

10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00250-7

10.1002/qj.49710644707

10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_4

Wofsy S. C., 2002, The North American Carbon Program (NACP): A report of the NACP committee of the U.S. Interagency Carbon Cycle Science Program

10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.10.004

10.2134/jeq2002.1433