Reimagining public policy formulation and analysis: a comprehensive theoretical framework for public policy
Tóm tắt
This research paper delves into the intricate domain of policy science, focusing on the policy-making process itself. Existing theoretical frameworks in policy science often overlook essential nuances, particularly the role of political willingness causing non-linearity in the policy-making process. Three fundamental questions drive the research at hand. First, the research delves into the adequacy of existing policy frameworks in effectively elucidating the complexities of policymaking in the context of large democracies, with a particular focus on India. Second, it investigates the significant role of political willingness in shaping the trajectory of policymaking, particularly within democratic systems. Lastly, the research aims to construct a comprehensive framework capable of accommodating and explaining the non-linear dynamics introduced by the influence of political willingness throughout the policy-making process. Through an analysis of India's Data Protection Regulation formulation process, this paper attempts to map the existing gap and way forward. As an outcome of the case study analysis, the proposed framework introduces political willingness as a central element extending the policy formulation cycle and showcases its influence on agenda setting, policy formulation, adoption, implementation, and evaluation. This research contributes to the field of policy science by providing a comprehensive framework that accounts for the complexities of policymaking, especially in the Indian context. By acknowledging the pivotal role of political willingness, this framework seeks to bridge the gap in existing theoretical models, offering a more holistic understanding of policy formulation and analysis. This research lays the foundation for a paradigm shift in the study of policy science, addressing the challenges posed by evolving governance mechanisms and the rising influence of political agendas in the modern world.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bhargava Y. Cabinet clears draft Data Protection Bill, to be tabled in monsoon session of Parliament. 2023, July 05. https://theprint.in/india/governance/cabinet-clears-draft-data-protection-bill-to-be-tabled-in-monsoon-session-of-parliament/1656238/. Accessed 6 Aug 2023.
Birkland TA. An introduction to the policy process theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: Routledge; 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351023948.
Dror Y. Ventures in policy sciences: concepts and applications. New York: American Elsevier; 1971.
Dye TR. Understanding public policy. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1987.
Foucault M. Society must be defended. London: Penguin Group; 2004.
Heineman RA, Bluhm WT, Peterson SA, Kearny EN. The world of the policy analyst: rationality, values, & politics. New York: Chatham House Publishers; 2002.
Herweg N, Zahariadis N, Zohlnhofer R. Theories of policy processes. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA, editors. The multiple streams fraemwork: foundstions, refinements, and empirical applications. 4th ed. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2017. p. 17–51.
Hochtl J, Parycek P, Schollhammer R. Big data in the policy cycle: policy decision making in the digital era. J Organ Comput Electron Commer. 2016;26(1–2):147–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187.
Howard C. The policy cycle: a model of post-machiavellian policy making? Aust J Public Adm. 2005;64(3):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00447.x.
King G, Pen J, Roberts ME. How censorship in china allows government criticism but silences collective expression. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014.
Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman; 2011.
Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolution. New York: University of Chicago. 1962. https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/Stanford/CS477/papers/Kuhn-SSR-2ndEd.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2022.
Laswell H. The decision process: seven categories of functional analysis. Maryland: Bureau of Governmental Research, College of Business and Public Administration; 1956.
Leetaru KH. Culturomics 2.0: forecasting large-scale human behavior using global news media tone in time and space. First Monday. 2011;16(9):1–28. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i9.3663.
Lerner D, Lasswell HD. The policy sciences: recent developments in scope and method. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1951.
Lowi TJ. American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics. 1964;16(4):677–715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452.
May JV, Wildavsky AB. The policy cycle. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications; 1978.
Mccormick JP. Machiavellian democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975325.
Meit Y. The personal data protection bill, 2018. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. 2018. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Personal_Data_Protection_Bill,2018.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2019.
Meit Y. Personal data protection bill, 2019. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. 2019. http://164.100.47.4/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/Asintroduced/373_2019_LS_Eng.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2023.
Nachmias D, Felbinger C. Utilization in the policy cycle: directions for research. Rev Policy Res. 1982;2(2):300–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1982.tb00676.x.
Radin B. Beyond machiavelli: policy analysis comes of age. Washington: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
Surya S. Joint Parliamentary Committee Report Summary Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019. 2021, Dec 17. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2019/Summary-JPC%20Report_PDP%20Bill,%202019.pdf.