Regulatory takings and constitutional repair the 1990s' property-rights rebellion
Tóm tắt
In spite of the fact that the Constitution's fifth amendment states that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,” politicians systematically impose almost confiscatory land-use restrictions on citizens. Growth of regulation and property-rights uncertainty have spawned grass roots opposition and political efforts to reinforce constitutional protections. Lacking success at the national level, property-rights advocates moved to the states where by August 1994 more than forty introduced property-rights legislation. Statistical estimates of the likelihood that such legislation would be introduced reveal strong support of the notion that the property-rights movement is a reaction to growth of government regulation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ackerman, B. (1991)We the People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Aranson, P. H. (1991) “Calhoun's Constitutional Economics.”Constitutional Political Economy 2: 31–52.
Arrensen, D. A. (1988) “Compensation for Regulatory Takings: Finality of Local Decisionmaking and the Measure of Compensation.”Indiana Law Journal 63 (Summer): 649–668.
Barrett, P. M. (1994) “A Store Owner's Squabble with a City Tests Government's Right to Private Land.”Wall Street Journal, March 23, B1.
Brookes, W. T. (1991) “Civil War Against Property Owners?Richmond Times-Dispatch, August 4, H-7.
Buchanan, J. M. (1973) “The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State.”Natural Resources Journal 13 (October): 579–594. Reprinted in: James M. Buchanan and Robert T. Tollison (eds.) (1984),The Theory of Public Choice II (pp. 159–173). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan, J. M., and D. Lee. (1995) “Having It Both Ways.”Forbes (February 27): 87.
Buck, D. C. (1993) “Property' in the Fifth Amendment: A Quest for Common Ground in the Maze of Regulatory Takings.”Vanderbilt Law Review 46 (October): 1283–1332.
Burkhart, B. (1992a) “Bills Proposed by House, Senate Derived from Less-Than-Pure Motives.”Arizona Republic (February 23): D14.
Burkhart, B. (1992b) “Symington May Face 2 Bills Best Scrapped.”Arizona Republic, May 17: D11
Calhoun, J. C. (1992) “The Fort Hill Address: On the Relations of the States and Federal Government” (Original, 1831). In: Ross M. Lence (ed.),Union and Liberty: The Political Philosophy of John C. Calhoun (pp. 382–383). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Camia, C. (1994) “Legislators Draw in the Reins on Environmental Rules.”Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (April 30): 1060–1064.
Coase, R. H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.
Crandall, R. W. (1983)Controlling Industrial Pollution. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Defenders of Property Rights. (1993) “Pennsylvania Supreme Court Strikes Down Overreaching by Philadelphia Historical Commission.” Washing, DC: Defenders of Property Rights (November 16).
“Downsizing Government.” (1995)Business Week (January 23): 37–41.
Epstein, R. A. (1985)Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
“Government, Keep Out” (1994)The Economist (July 2): 26.
Henderson, B. (1994) “Property Rights Debate Could Shape Environmental Law.”The State (April 18): B5.
Hoye, D. (1992) “Environmental Interests Put on Defensive: Legislation Feared Tip of Iceberg.”Phoenix Gazette, February 28, A1.
“Is Taking Stealing?” (1993)The Economist (March 6): 24.
Ivy, L. (1988) “The 1986 Term ‘Takings’ Clause Cases: A Unified Approach to Regulatory Takings?”Oklahoma City University Law Review 13 (Summer): 325–356.
Kahn, P. W. (1992)Legitimacy and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kiplinger Washington Letter. (1995) (February 3).
Knickerbocker, B. (1993) “Property-Rights Movement gains Ground in Congress.”Christian Science Monitor, September 22, 1.
Kull, R. (1992) “Petitions Submitted to Halt Property Law: Measure May Go to Arizona Voters.”Phoenix Gazette, September 30, B2.
Lavelle, M. (1993) “The ‘Property Rights’ Revolt: Environmentalists Fret as States Pass Reagan-Style Takings Laws.”National Law Journal 15 (May 10): 1.
Marshall, S. E. (1993) “Property as a Civil Right: The Expansion of Washington State Regulatory Taking Law.”Willamette Law Review 29 (Fall): 867–892.
Marzulla, N. G. (1991) “Pennsylvania Court Strikes a Blow Against Unduly Burdensome Historic Designation of Private Property.”Land Rights Letter (December): 6.
Marzulla, N. G. (1992a) “A Two-Front Battle for Property Rights.”Christian Science Monitor, September 18, 19.
Marzulla, N. G. (1992b) “A Wetland That Not Even a Glancing Goose Could Save.”Land Rights Letter (June): 6
Marzulla, N. G. (1993) “Who Benefits from the State Private Property Legislation? You, the Taxpayer.”Land Rights Letter (June): 4.
Marzulla, R. J. (1988) “The New ‘Takings’ Executive Order and Environmental Regulation-Collision or Cooperation?”Environmental Law Reporter (July): 10,254–10,260.
Marzulla, R. J., and N. G. Marzulla. (1991) “Regulatory Takings in the United States Claims Courts: Adjusting the Burdens That in Fairness and Equity Ought to be Borne by Society as a Whole.”Catholic University Law Review 40 (Spring): 549–569.
Meiners, R. E., and B. Yandle. (1992) “Constitutional Choice for the Control of Water Pollution.”Constitutional Political Economy 3 (1992): 359–380.
Penhale, E. (1992) “Developers Chip at Growth Control: Attack on the State's Law Is Paying Off in Senate.”Seattle Post-Intelligencer, February 21, B1.
Posner, R. A. (1971) “Taxation by Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring): 22–50.
Skelton, H. N. (1990) “Houses on the Sand: Takings Issues Surrounding Statutory Restrictions on the Use of Oceanfront Property.”Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 18 (Fall): 125–158.
Springston, R. (1993) “Merit of Land Regulation: Debated Measure to Limit Governmental ‘Takings’ Has More Foes Than Friends at Session Here.”Richmond Times-Dispatch, December 1, B-4.
Staff Report. (1994) “Property Owner Compensation Backed.”Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 15, A6.
Thompson, M. (1995) “Old MacDonald Had a Subsidy.”Wall Street Journal, February 15, A18.
Toth, J. T. (1991) “Coleman v. Utah State Land Board: Searching for a Balanced Approach to ‘Takings’ Under the Utah Constitution.”Utah Law Review (Spring): 505–529.
Wallace, J., and S. Maier. (1992) “Putting on Pressure for Property Rights: Anti-Environmentalists Gain Headway in Olympia.”Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 18, A1.
Weaver, R. W., and M. D. Solov. (1992) “New Standards, If Not Greater Protection, Against Land Use Regulations.”Florida Bar Journal 66 (December): 58–61.
World Almanac and Book of Facts. (1992) New York: Scripps-Howard.
Yandle, B. (1989)The Political Limits of Environmental Regulation. Westport, CT: Quorum Press.
Yandle, B. (1991) “Organic Constitutions and Common Law.”Constitutional Political Economy 2: 225–241.
Yandle, B. (1994) “Regulatory Takings, Farmers, Ranchers and the Fifth Amendment.” Center for Policy Studies, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Yandle, B. (1995)Land Rights: The 1990s Property Rights Rebellion. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.