Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Moral Distress and Ethical Climate

Nursing Ethics - Tập 16 Số 5 - Trang 561-573 - 2009
Bernie Pauly1, Colleen Varcoe1, Janet Storch2, Lorelei Newton1
1University of Victoria , Victoria , BC, Canada#TAB#
2Varcoe, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada

Tóm tắt

Moral distress is a phenomenon of increasing concern in nursing practice, education and research. Previous research has suggested that moral distress is associated with perceptions of ethical climate, which has implications for nursing practice and patient outcomes. In this study, a randomly selected sample of registered nurses was surveyed using Corley’s Moral Distress Scale and Olson’s Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS). The registered nurses reported moderate levels of moral distress intensity. Moral distress intensity and frequency were found to be inversely correlated with perceptions of ethical climate. Each of the HECS factors (peers, patients, managers, hospitals and physicians) was found to be significantly correlated with moral distress. Based on these findings, we highlight insights for practice and future research that are needed to enhance the development of strategies aimed at improving the ethical climate of nurses’ workplaces for the benefit of both nurses and patients.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1466-769X.2004.00160.x

10.1191/0969733006ne880oa

10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00279-X

O’Brien-Pallas L., Baumann A., Villeneuve M. The quality of nursing work life. In: Hibberd JM, Jyle ME eds. Nursing management in Canada. Toronto: Saunders Canada, 1994: 391-409.

Shamian J., 2002, Can J Nurs Res, 33, 35

Torgerson R., 2007, Not there yet: improving the working conditions for Canadian Nurses. (Research no. 48150.)

10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02892.x

Webster GC, Baylis FE Moral residue. In: Rubin SB, Zoloth L eds. Margin of error: the ethics of mistakes in the practice of medicine. Haggerstown: University Publishing Group, 2000: 217-30.

Rodney PA, 1997, Towards connectedness and trust: nurses’ enactment of their moral agency within an organizational context

Rodney P., 2002, Can J Nurs Res, 34, 75

Rodney P., Street A. The moral climate of nursing practice: inquiry and action. In: Storch J, Rodney P, Starzomski R eds. Toward a moral horizon: nursing ethics for leadership and practice. Toronto: Pearson Education Canada, 2004: 209.

10.12927/cjnl.2002.19160

Varcoe C., Rodney P. Constrained agency: the social structure of nurses’ work. In: Bolaria BS, Dickinson H eds. Health, illness, and health care in Canada, fourth edition. Toronto: Nelson Education, 2009: 122-50.

10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00030.x

Wilkinson J., 1988, Nurs Forum, 23, 17

10.1097/00005110-200010000-00003

10.1001/jama.288.16.1987

Clarke H., 2001, Hosp Q, 4, 50

Duncan S., 2001, Can J Nurs Res, 32, 57

O’Brien-Pallas L., 2003, Longwoods Rev, 1, 2

10.1097/00000446-199611000-00034

Jameton A., 1984, Nursing practice: the ethical issues

10.1097/00005237-200009000-00005

10.1097/00006199-200305000-00006

10.4037/ajcc2005.14.6.523

10.4037/ajcc1995.4.4.280

10.1191/0969733002ne557oa

10.1191/0969733005ne809oa

10.1097/00003465-200509000-00011

10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00181.x

10.1207/s15327019eb1503_1

Rodney P., 2001, Can J Nurs Res, 33, 35

Gaudine AP, 2002, Can J Nurs Res, 34, 17

10.1097/01.CCM.0000254722.50608.2D

10.1207/s15327019eb1503_1

10.1097/01.CCM.0000248879.19054.73

10.1097/00005650-199709000-00003

McDaniel C., 1998, Nurs Clin North Am, 33, 363, 10.1016/S0029-6465(22)02599-3

10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01331.x

Olson L., 2002, Chart, 99, 3

Beagan B., 2007, Can J Nurs Res, 39, 36

10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04013.x

10.1191/0969733002ne493oa

10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01658.x

Gillis A., 2002, Research for nurses: methods and interpretation

10.1177/01678702025002002

Canadian Institute of Health Information., 2007, Highlights from the regulated nursing workforce in Canada: 2006

College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia., 2005, Statistics

Health Canada ., 2006, Nursing issues: general statistics from the Office of Nursing Policy

Dillman D., 2000, Mail and internet surveys, second edition

Corley M., 1998, Sch Inq Nurs Pract, 12, 99

10.1177/0969733007075870

10.1891/rtnp.18.1.73.28054

10.1016/S0899-5885(18)30804-9