Regional differences in effects of publicly sponsored R&D grants on SME performance

Small Business Economics - Tập 54 - Trang 951-969 - 2018
Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall1, Josefin Videnord2
1Södertörn University and The European Institute of Japanese Studies at the Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Economics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Tóm tắt

This paper explores regional variation in the effects of publicly sponsored R&D grants on SME performance. The results suggest that there is no guarantee that the grants will impact firm growth, either positive or negative. Positive growth effects are most likely to be found for publicly sponsored R&D grants targeting SMEs located in regions abundant with skilled labor, whereas the opposite is found for SMEs located in regions with a limited supply of skilled labor.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78, 678–690. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Arrelano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Econometric Studies, 58, 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968. Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. (2006). The geography of innovations: regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011. Asheim, B. T., Lawton Smith, H., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x. Banno, M., Morandi, V., & Amorim, C. (2013). Public policy for innovation and internationalization: are they worth it? Applied Economic Letters, 20(10), 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.765535. Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27, 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00065-1. Bebek, U. G. (2011). Consistency of the proposed additive measures of revealed comparative advantage. Economics Bulletin, 31(3), 2491–2499. Blackwell, M., Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). CEM: coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(4), 524.546. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 11–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8. Boschma, R., & Martin, R. (2007). Editorial: constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm021. Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2013). The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: a proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography, 89(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x. Boschma, R. A., Balland, P. A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industry and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu012. Bronzini, R., & Iachini, E. (2014). Are incentives for R&D effective? Evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4), 100–134. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.4.100. Cahuc, P., & Zylberberg, A. (2004). Labour economics. MIT-press. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementations of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 33–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x. Cappelen, Å., Fjærli, E., Iancu, D.-C., Klemetsen, M., Moxnes, A., Nilsen, Ø. A., Rakneru, A., & Rybalka, M. (2016). Innovasjons- og verdiskapningseffekter av utvalgtenaeringpolitiske virkemidler, report 2016/12. Statistics: Norway. Chansarn, S. (2010). Labor productivity growth, education, health and technological progress: a cross-country analysis. Economic Analysis & Policy, 40(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0313-5926(10)50027-4. Cin, B. C., Kim, Y. J., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs. Small Business Economics, 48, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9786-x. Coberly, C., King, G., Nielsen, R., Pope, J. E., & Wells A. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference, Mimeo, Copy at http://j.mp/2nydGlv Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945. Cooke, P. (2004). Evolution of regional innovation systems: emergence, theory, challenge for action. In: Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., Braczyk, H-J (Eds) (2004). Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world, 1–18. London: Routledge. Criscuolo, C., Martin, F., Overman, H., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). The causal effects of an industrial policy. IZA DP, No. 6323. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17842. Croce, A., Marti, J., & Murtinu, S. (2013). The impact of venture capital on the productivity growth of European entrepreneurial firms: ‘screening’ or ‘value added’effect? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 489–510. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1705225. Cumming, D., Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2017). Governmental and independent venture capital investments in Europe: a firm-level analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 439–459. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2294746. Czarnitzki, D., & Fier, A. (2002). Do innovation subsidies crowd out private investment? Evidence from the German service sector. ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 02-04. Daunfeldt, S.-O., Halvarsson, D., & Tingvall Gustavsson, P. (2016). Statliga innovationsstöd till små och medelstora företag – har de någon effekt? Ekonomisk Debatt, 44(1), 6–19. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00080-0. Doloreux, D. (2004). Regional innovation systems in Canada: a comparative study. Regional Studies, 38(5), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116042000229267. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002. Dosi, G. (1988). The nature of the innovative process. In G. Dosi et al. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069001100116. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2013). Impacts of innovation policy: synthesis and conclusions—compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention project. Nesta, 2013, June. UK. Ellison, G., Kerr, W. R., & Glaeser, E. (2010). What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review, 100(3), 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13068. Feldman, M. P. (1994a). The geography of innovation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3333-5. Feldman, M. P. (1994b). Knowledge complementarity and innovation. Small Business Economics, 6, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01065139. Felipe, J., & Gerard Adams, F. (2005). “A theory of production” the estimation of the Cobb-Douglas function: a retrospective view. Eastern Economic Journal, 31(3), 427–445. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy, cities, region and international trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Georghiou, L., Smith, K., Tojvanen, O., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2003). Evaluation of the Finnish innovation support system. 5/2013. Helsinki: Ministry of Trade and Industry. Glaeser, E. (2008). Cities, agglomeration and spatial equilibrium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gonzalez, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazo, C. (2005). Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(4), 930–949. Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970’s. American Economic Review, 76(1), 141–167. Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9), 1523–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.002. Gustafsson, A., Hallman, A., Karlsson, N., & Stephan, A. (2016). The “sugar rush” from innovation subsidies: a robust political economy perspective. Empirica, 43(4), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9350-6. Han, C., & Phillips, P. C. B. (2010). GMM estimation for dynamic panels with fixed effects and strong instruments at unity. Econometric Theory, 26, 119–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646660909063x. Herrera, L., & Nieto, M. (2008). The national innovation policy effect according to firm location. Technovation, 28, 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.009. Heshmati, A., & Lööf, H. (2005). The impact of public funds on private R&D investment: new evidence from a firm level innovation study. In Discussion papers 11862. MTT Agrifood Research: Finland. Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581. Hijzen, A., & Swaim, P. (2008). Offshoring, labour market institutions and the elasticity of labour demand. The University of Nottingham, Research paper series, No. 2008/05. Hinloopen, J., &Van Marrewijk, C. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Welwirtschaftliches Archiv, Heft 137, Vol. 1, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02707598. Hoen, A. R., & Oosterhaven, J. (2006). On the measurement of comparative advantage. The Annals of Regional Science, 40(3), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0076-4. Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2011). Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 106(493), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599. Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013. Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023651. Isaksen, A., & Onsager, K. (2010). Regions, networks and innovative performance: the case of knowledge-intensive industries in Norway. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776409356217. Koski, H., & Pajarinen, M. (2013). The role of business subsidies in job creation of start-ups, gazelles and incumbents. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9420-5. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Kunz, J. (2014). SME speaks: lack of skilled workers challenges manufactures. Manufacturing Engineering Magazine, 2014, 17–18. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7. Luna, X., & Lundin, M. (2009). Sensitivity analysis of the unconfoundedness assumption in observational studies. IFAU WP, No. 2009:12. Marjolein, C.J.C. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and economic growth. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan. Neffke, F., Henning, M. S., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x. Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2014). Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological bias in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt057. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015a). Evaluation of industrial policy: methodological issues and policy lessons, DSTI/IND(2014)3/Final. Paris: OECD. OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015b). Labour market mismatch and labour productivity: evidence from PIAAC data. In ECO/WKP(2015)27. Paris: OECD. Piekkola, H. (2007). Public funding of R&D and growth: firm-level evidence from Finland. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590600661897. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002. Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002). Observational studies, 2nd ed. Springer: New York. Rutkowski, J. (2007). From the shortage of jobs to the shortage of skilled workers: labor markets in the EU new member states. IZA DP. 3202. Schumpeter, J. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Redvers Opie (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. Srholec, M. (2010). A multilevel approach to geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903365094. Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410. Söderblom, A., Samuelsson, M., Wiklund, J., & Sandberg, R. (2015). Inside the black box of outcome additionality: effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance. Research Policy, 44(8), 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.009. Tillväxtverket. (2011). In Swedish: Tillväxtmöjligheter och tillväxthinder för svenska små och medelstora företag. Företagens villkor och verklighet 2011. Tillväxtverket: Stockholm. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018. UNCTAD. (1997). Invest in France mission: DATAR and Artur Andersen. International investment: toward the year 2001. OECD, Paris 1997. Veugelers, R. (2015). Mixing and matching research and innovation policies in EU countries. Bruegel Working Paper 2015/16, Dec 2015. Vinnova. (2014). In Swedish: Effektanalys av Vinnovas finansiering av Innovativa SMF. Yeats, A. J. (1985). On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysis. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 121(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02705840. Yu, R., Cai, J., & Leung, P. S. (2009). The normalized revealed comparative advantage index. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(1), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3. Zúñiga-Vicente, J. A., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán-ZazoJ.I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: a survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x.