Refined Stratified Sampling for efficient Monte Carlo based uncertainty quantification

Janssen H. Monte-carlo based uncertainty analysis: sampling efficiency and sampling convergence. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013;109:(123–132).

Tocher K. The art of simulation. The English Universities Press, London, UK; 1963.

Helton, 2003, Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 81, 23, 10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9

McKay, 1979, A comparison of three methods of selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239

Olsson, 2003, On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis, Struct Saf, 25, 47, 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5

Wang, 2003, Adaptive response surface method using inherited Latin hypercube design points, Trans ASME: J Mech Des, 125, 210, 10.1115/1.1561044

Stein, 1987, Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling, Technometrics, 29, 143, 10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205

Owen, 1992, A central limit theorem for Latin hypercube sampling, J R Stat Soc Ser B, 54, 541, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01895.x

Huntington, 1998, Improvements to and limitations of Latin hypercube sampling, Probab Eng Mech, 13, 245, 10.1016/S0266-8920(97)00013-1

Fang, 2001, Wrap-around l2-discrepancy of random sampling, Latin hypercube, and uniform designs, J Complex, 17, 608, 10.1006/jcom.2001.0589

Fang, 2002, Centered l2-discrepancy of random sampling and Latin hypercube design, and construction of uniform designs, Math Comput, 71, 275, 10.1090/S0025-5718-00-01281-3

Glasserman P, Monte Carlo Methods in financial engineering. Springer; New York, USA, 2003.

Rubinstein, 2008

Kalos M, Whitlock P. Monte Carlo methods. Wiley; Weinheim, Germany, 2008.

Gilman M. A brief survey of stopping rules for Monte Carlo In: Proceedings of the second conference on applications of simulations, New York, NY, USA; 1968.

Tong, 2006, Refinement strategies for stratified sampling methods, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 91, 1257, 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.027

Sallaberry, 2008, Extension of Latin hypercube samples with correlated variables, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 93, 1047, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.005

Vorechovsky, 2015, Hierarchical refinement of Latin hypercube samples, Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng, 30, 394, 10.1111/mice.12088

Iman R. Statistical methods for including uncertainties associated with the geologic isolation of radioactive waste which allow for comparison with licensing criteria. In: Proceedings of the symposium on uncertainties associated with the regulation of the geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste, Gatlinburg, TN, USA; 1981.

McKay M. Evaluating prediction uncertainty. Technical report. NUREG/CR-6311, Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1995.

Qian, 2009, Nested Latin hypercube designs, Biometrika, 96, 957, 10.1093/biomet/asp045

Xiong, 2009, Optimizing Latin hypercube design for sequential sampling of computer experiments, Eng Optim, 41, 793, 10.1080/03052150902852999

Rennen, 2010, Nested maximin Latin hypercube designs, Struct Multidiscip Optim, 41, 371, 10.1007/s00158-009-0432-y

Lepage, 1978, A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration, J Comput Phys, 27, 192, 10.1016/0021-9991(78)90004-9

Press, 1990, Recursive stratified sampling for multidimensional Monte Carlo integration, Comput Phys, 4, 190, 10.1063/1.4822899

Shields M, Sundar V. Targeted random sampling: a new approach for efficient reliability estimation of complex systems. Int J Reliab Saf.

Johnson, 1990, Minimax and maximin distance designs, J Stat Plan Inference, 26, 131, 10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B

Morris, 1995, Exploratory designs for computational experiments, J Stat Plan Inference, 43, 381, 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-T

Ye, 2000, Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs, J Stat Plan Inference, 90, 145, 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00105-1

Joseph V, Hung Y. Orthogonal-maximin Latin hypercube designs. Stat Sin 2008;18(171–186).

Liefvendahl, 2006, A study on algorithms for optimization of Latin hypercubes, J Stat Plan Inference, 136, 3231, 10.1016/j.jspi.2005.01.007

Park, 1994, Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments, J Stat Plan Inference, 39, 95, 10.1016/0378-3758(94)90115-5

Iman, 1982, A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables, Commun Stat: Simul Comput, 11, 311, 10.1080/03610918208812265

Florian, 1992, An efficient sampling scheme, Probab Eng Mech, 7, 123, 10.1016/0266-8920(92)90015-A

Vorechovsky, 2009, Correlation control in small-sample monte carlo type simulations i, Probab Eng Mech, 24, 452, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.01.004

Tang, 1993, Orthogonal array-based Latin hypercubes, J Am Stat Assoc, 88, 1392, 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476423

Ye, 1998, Orthogonal column Latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments, J Am Stat Assoc, 93, 1430, 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473803

Cioppa, 2007, Efficient nearly orthogonal and space-filling Latin hypercubes, Technometrics, 49, 45, 10.1198/004017006000000453

Fang K-T, Li R, Sudjianto A. Design and modeling for computer experiments. London, UK: Chapman and Hall/CRC; Boca Roton, FL, USA, 2006.

Dalbey K, Karystinos G. Fast generation of space-filling Latin hypercube sample designs. In: Proceedings of the 13th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference; 2010.

Hickernell F. Lattice rules: how well do they measure up? In: random and quasi-random point sets. Springer; New York, USA, 1998.

Aurenhammer, 1991, Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure, ACM Comput Surv, 23, 345, 10.1145/116873.116880

Wu C, Hamada M. Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. New York: Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000.

Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, et al. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Wiley; 2008.

Grigoriu, 2009, Reduced order models for random function. application to stochastic problems, Appl Math Model, 33, 161, 10.1016/j.apm.2007.10.023

Roy, 2011, A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 200, 2131, 10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.016

Teferra, 2014, Mapping model validation metrics to subject matter expert scores for model adequacy assessment, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 132, 9, 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.010

Bleich, 1970, Interaction between structures and bilinear fluids, Int J Solids Struct, 6, 617, 10.1016/0020-7683(70)90034-X

DiMaggio, 1981, Uncoupling approximations in fluid–structure interaction problems with cavitation, J Appl Mech, 48, 753, 10.1115/1.3157728

Sprague, 2001, Computational treatments of cavitation effects in near-free-surface underwater shock, Shock Vib, 7, 105, 10.1155/2001/853074

Sprague, 2003, Spectral elements and field separation for an acoustic field subject to cavitation, J Comput Phys, 184, 149, 10.1016/S0021-9991(02)00024-4

Stultz K, Daddazio R. The applicability of fluid–structure interaction approaches to the analysis of floating targets subjected to undex loading In: Proceedings of the 73rd shock and vibration symposium, Newport, RI; 2002.

Efron, 1979, Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife, Ann Stat, 7, 1, 10.1214/aos/1176344552