Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods

Resources and Energy Economics - Tập 20 Số 2 - Trang 85-116 - 1998
Donald P. Green1, Karen E. Jacowitz2, Daniel Kahneman3, Daniel McFadden4
1Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, Conn., USA
2Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
3Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA
4Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Barten, A.P., Bohm, V., 1982. Consumer theory. In: Arrow, K., Intriligator, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 2, 381–429.

Bishop, 1979, Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased?, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 61, 926, 10.2307/3180348

Bishop, 1983, Contingent valuation of environmental assets: comparisons with a simulated market, Natural Resour. J., 23, 619

Bohm, 1972, Estimating willingness to pay: an experiment, Eur. Econ. Rev., 3, 111, 10.1016/0014-2921(72)90001-3

Bowker, 1988, Use of dichotomous choice nonmarket methods to value the whooping crane resource, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 70, 372, 10.2307/1242078

Boyle, 1987, Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analysis: a case study involving endangered species, Water Resour. Res., 23, 943, 10.1029/WR023i005p00943

Boyle, 1985, Starting-point bias in contingent valuation bidding games, Land Econ., 61, 188, 10.2307/3145811

Bradford, 1970, Benefit-cost analysis and demand curves for public goods, Kyklos, 23, 775, 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb01044.x

Cameron, 1991, Referendum contingent valuation estimates: sensitivity to the assignment of offered values, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 86, 910, 10.2307/2290504

Cameron, 1987, Efficient estimation methods for use with `closed-ended' contingent valuation survey data, Rev. Econ. Stat., 69, 269, 10.2307/1927234

Carson, R., Mitchell, R., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R., Presser, S., Ruud, P., 1992. A contingent valuation study of lost passive use values resulting from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska.

Ciriacy-Wanthrup, 1947, Capital returns from soil conservation programs, J. Farm Econ., 29, 1188

Cooper, J., Loomis, J., 1991. Economic value of wildlife resources in the San Joaquin Valley: hunting and viewing values, In: Dinar, A., Zilberman, D. (Eds.), The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Kluwer Academic, Boston.

Cummings, R., Brookshire, D., Schulze, W., 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods. Rowman and Littlefield: Savage, MD.

Davis, 1963, Recreation-planning as an economic problem, Natural Resour. J., 3, 239

Desvousges, W., Johnson, R., Dunford, R., Boyle, K., Hudson, S., Wilson, N., 1992. Measuring nonuse damages using contingent valuation: an experimental evaluation of accuracy. RTI Monograph 93-1: Research Triangle, NC.

Diamond, P., Hausman, J., 1994. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?, J. Econ. Perspectives.

Diamond, 1974, Some uses of the expenditure function in public finance, J. Public Econ., 3, 3, 10.1016/0047-2727(74)90020-6

Diewert, E., 1982. Duality approaches in microeconomic theory. In: Arrow, K., Intriligator, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 2, 535–599.

Duffield, 1991, Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Land Econ., 67, 225, 10.2307/3146413

Durbin, J., 1973. Distribution Theory for Tests Based on the Sample Distribution Function, SIAM: Philadelphia.

Folmer, H., van Ierland, E., 1989. Valuation methods and policy-making in environmental economics: relevance and scope. In: Folmer, H., van Ierland, E. (Eds.), Valuation Methods and Policy-Making in Environmental Economics. Studies in Environmental Science 36, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Gregory, 1987, Auctions, experiments, and contingent valuation, Public Choice, 55, 273, 10.1007/BF00124872

Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., 1991. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. Decision Research Discussion Paper, Eugene.

Hanemann, 1984, Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 66, 332, 10.2307/1240800

Hanemann, M., 1994. Contingent valuation and economics. J. Econ. Perspectives.

Hausman, J. (Ed.), 1993. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North Holland, Amsterdam.

Hoehn, 1987, A satisfactory benefit-cost indicator for contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 14, 226, 10.1016/0095-0696(87)90018-0

Hurwicz, L., 1986. Incentive aspects of decentralization. In: Arrow, K., Intriligator, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 3, 1441–1482.

Jacowitz, K., Kahneman, D., 1995. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, forthcoming.

McConnell, 1990, Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 18, 19, 10.1016/0095-0696(90)90049-5

McFadden, 1994, Contingent valuation and social choice, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 76, 689, 10.2307/1243732

Milon, 1989, Contingent valuation experiments for strategic behavior, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 17, 293, 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90022-3

Mitchell, Carson, 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

Northcraft, 1987, Experts, amateurs, and real estate: an anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions, Org. Behav. Human Decision Proc., 39, 84, 10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-X

Palfrey, T., Rosenthal, H., 1990. Testing game-theoretic models of free-riding: new evidence on probability bias and learning. Working Paper, California Institute of Technology.

Quattrone, G., Lawrence, C., Finkel, S., Andrus, D., 1984. Explorations in anchoring: the effects of prior range, anchor extremity, and suggestive hints. Working Paper, Stanford University.

Randall, 1974, Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 1, 132, 10.1016/0095-0696(74)90010-2

Rowe, 1980, An experiment on the economic value of visibility, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 7, 1, 10.1016/0095-0696(80)90018-2

Schkade, D., Payne, J., 1993. Where do the numbers come from? How people respond to contingent valuation questions. In: Hausman, J. (Ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, North Holland, Amsterdam.

Schultz, 1981, Valuing environmental commodities: some recent experiments, Land Econ., 57, 151, 10.2307/3145783

Serfling, R., 1980. Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York.

Shorack, G., Wellner, J., 1986. Empirical processes with applications to statistics. Wiley, New York.

Silberman, 1989, The behavior of respondents in contingent valuation: evidence on starting bids, J. Behavioral Econ., 18, 51, 10.1016/0090-5720(89)90018-1

Smith, 1979, An experimental comparison of three public good decision mechanisms, Scand. J. Econ., 81, 198, 10.2307/3439960

Thaler, 1990, Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice, Manage. Sci., 36, 643, 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643

Tversky, 1974, Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124, 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, No. 10, Jan. 13, 4602–4614.

Wilson, T., Houston, C., Etling, K., Brekke, N., 1994. Anchoring versus adjustment errors in judgment: the generalizability of anchoring effects. Working Paper, Univ. of Virginia.