Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes
Tóm tắt
The utility of hydrologic indices for describing various aspects of streamflow regimes has resulted in their increased application in riverine research. Consequently, researchers are now confronted with the task of having to choose among a large number of competing hydrologic indices to reduce computational effort and variable redundancy prior to statistical analyses, while still adequately representing the major facets of the flow regime. The present study addresses this concern by providing a comprehensive review of 171 currently available hydrologic indices (including the commonly used Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration) using long‐term flow records from 420 sites from across the continental USA. We highlight patterns of redundancy among these hydrologic indices and provide a number of statistically and ecologically based recommendations for the selection of a reduced set of indices that can simultaneously (1) explain a dominant proportion of statistical variation in the complete set of hydrologic indices and (2) minimize multicollinearity while still adequately representing recognized, critical attributes of the flow regime. In addition, we examine the transferability of hydrologic indices across ‘stream types’ by identifying indices that consistently explain dominant patterns of variance across streams in varying climatic and geologic environments. Together, our results provide a framework from which researchers can identify hydrologic indices that adequately characterize flow regimes in a non‐redundant manner. In combination with ecological knowledge, this framework can guide researchers in the parsimonious selection of hydrologic indices for future hydroecological studies. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arthington AH, 1991, Water Allocation for the Environment: Proceedings of an International Seminar and Workshop, 69
BrownC KingJ.2000.Environmental flow assessments for rivers: A summary of the DRIFT process. Information Report no. 01/00 Southern Waters' Ecological Research and Consulting Pty (Ltd): Mowbray South Africa (www.southernwaters.co.za).
Clausen B, 2000, Nordic Hydrological Conference 2000, 3
Cushing CE, 1983, Relationships among chemical, physical and biological indices along a river continua based on multivariate analyses, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 98, 317
Legendre P, 1998, Numerical Ecology
McMahon TA, 1992, Global Runoff—Continental Comparisons of Annual Flows and Peak Discharges
Minckley WL, 1991, Battle against Extinction: Native Fish Management in the American West
Minckley WL, 1987, Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes, 93
Moss DM, 1987, The prediction of the macro‐invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running‐water sites in Great Britain using environmental data, Freshwater Biology, 33, 141
Pettit NE, 2001, Identifying the natural flow regime and the relationship with riparian vegetation for two contrasting western Australian rivers, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 17, 201, 10.1002/rrr.624
Petts G, 1995, The Ecological Basis for River Management, 1
PoffNL AllanJD.1993.Streamflow Variability Fish Community Structure and Implications for Climatic Change. US Environmental Protection Agency Report ERL‐D #2765: Duluth MN.
Puckridge JT, 2000, Hydrological persistence and the ecology of dryland rivers, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 16, 385, 10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<385::AID-RRR592>3.0.CO;2-W
Sokal RR, 1995, Biometry
Sparks RE, 1992, Predicting Ecosystem Risk. Vol XX. Advances in Modern Environmental Toxicology, 119
Zar JH, 1999, Biostatistical Analysis