Reduced dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction compared to standard dose CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in oncology patients: intra-individual comparison study on image quality and lesion conspicuity

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149

Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950-2007. Radiology 253(2):520–531. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082010

Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, et al. (2013) Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Invest Radiol 48(8):598–606. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182899104

Initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging (February 2010). Silver Spring, MD

Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4(5):272–284. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.03.002

Yu L, Bruesewitz MR, Thomas KB, et al. (2011) Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. Radiographics 31(3):835–848. doi: 10.1148/rg.313105079

Gunn ML, Kohr JR (2010) State of the art: technologies for computed tomography dose reduction. Emerg Radiol 17(3):209–218. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0850-6

McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26(2):503–512. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055138

Fleischmann D, Boas FE (2011) Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 21(3):510–517. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2056-z

Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 22(1):138–143. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2186-3

Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, Leiner T, et al. (2013) Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 23(6):1623–1631. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2765-y

Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, et al. (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34(1):40–45. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181b26c67

Smith EA, Dillman JR, Goodsitt MM, et al. (2014) Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. Radiology 270(2):526–534. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130362

Shuman WP, Green DE, Busey JM, et al. (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(5):1071–1076. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8986

Volders D, Bols A, Haspeslagh M, Coenegrachts K (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology 269(2):469–474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130002

Kaza RK, Platt JF, Al-Hawary MM, et al. (2012) CT enterography at 80 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus at 120 kVp with standard reconstruction: image quality, diagnostic adequacy, and dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(5):1084–1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6597

Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(1):126–131. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3855

Sato J, Akahane M, Inano S, et al. (2012) Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 30(2):146–153. doi: 10.1007/s11604-011-0026-7

Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22(8):1613–1623. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2452-z

Ichikawa Y, Kitagawa K, Nagasawa N, Murashima S, Sakuma H (2013) CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. BMC Med Imaging 13:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-27

Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose chest CT: comparison of pulmonary nodule detectability with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 48(4):206–212. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827efc3a

Hague CJ, Krowchuk N, Alhassan D, et al. (2014) Qualitative and quantitative assessment of smoking-related lung disease: effect of iterative reconstruction on low-dose computed tomographic examinations. J Thorac Imaging 29(6):350–356. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000118

Yoon HJ, Chung MJ, Hwang HS, Moon JW, Lee KS (2015) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-applied ultra-low-dose CT with radiography-comparable radiation dose: usefulness for lung nodule detection. Kor J Radiol 16(5):1132–1141. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1132

Herin E, Gardavaud F, Chiaradia M, et al. (2015) Use of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study. Eur Radiol 25(8):2362–2370. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3656-9

Deak Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, et al. (2013) Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 266(1):197–206. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112707

Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. (2012) Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1266–1274. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9382

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

Schwartz LH, Bogaerts J, Ford R, et al. (2009) Evaluation of lymph nodes with RECIST 1.1. Eur J Cancer 45(2):261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.028

Wang R, Yu W, Wu R, et al. (2012) Improved image quality in dual-energy abdominal CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction in image space and filtered back projection reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(2):402–406. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7159

Karpitschka M, Augart D, Becker HC, Reiser M, Graser A (2013) Dose reduction in oncological staging multidetector CT: effect of iterative reconstruction. Br J Radiol 86(1021):20120224. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120224

Vardhanabhuti V, Loader RJ, Mitchell GR, Riordan RD, Roobottom CA (2013) Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(3):545–552. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9424

Yasaka K, Katsura M, Akahane M, et al. (2013) Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. SpringerPlus 2(1):209. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-209

European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography (1999) http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/index.htm . Accessed January 2016

Olcott EW, Shin LK, Sommer G, et al. (2014) Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum. Acad Radiol 21(6):774–784. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.02.012

Nakamoto A, Kim T, Hori M, et al. (2015) Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol 84(9):1715–1723. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.027

Vardhanabhuti V, Loader R, Roobottom CA (2013) Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 48(3):167–174. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827b8f61

Solomon J, Mileto A, Nelson RC, Roy Choudhury K, Samei E (2015) Quantitative features of liver lesions, lung nodules, and renal stones at multi-detector row CT examinations: dependency on radiation dose and reconstruction algorithm. Radiology 279:185–194. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150892

Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34(11):4526–4544

Solomon J, Mileto A, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Samei E (2015) Diagnostic performance of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm for low-contrast detectability with a third-generation dual-source multidetector CT scanner: potential for radiation dose reduction in a multireader study. Radiology 275(3):735–745. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15142005

Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Grant KL, Raupach R (2015) ADMIRE: advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (White Paper). Siemens Healthcare