Redo-urethroplasty for the management of recurrent urethral strictures in males: a systematic review

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 37 - Trang 1801-1815 - 2019
Sara Jasionowska1,2, Oliver Brunckhorst1,2, Rowland W. Rees3, Asif Muneer4, Kamran Ahmed1,2
1MRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
2Department of Urology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
3Urology Department, University Hospital Southampton, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
4Department of Urology, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Redo-urethroplasty is a challenge for any genitourethral surgeon, with a number of techniques previously described. This systematic review aims to identify the surgical techniques described in the literature and evaluate the evidence for their effectiveness in managing recurrent urethral strictures. A systematic review of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1945 to July 2018 was performed and the urethroplasty procedures were classified according to the site and surgical technique. Primary outcomes included success rates measured via re-stricture rates and the post-op maximum urinary flow rate. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and patient-reported quality of life. A total of 39 identified studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two studies described the use of excision and primary anastomotic urethroplasty with success rates showing wide variability (58–100%). Success rates reported according to the site of the stricture also varied: bulbar (58–100%) and posterior (69–100%) recurrent strictures. One-stage substitution urethroplasty was described in 25 studies with success rates of 18–100%, with the best outcomes reported for bulbar (58–100%) and hypospadias-related (78.6–82%) strictures. Two-stage substitution urethroplasty was described in 12 studies with the success rates of 20–100%, with the best evidence related to hypospadias-related and posterior urethral strictures. The buccal mucosa graft was the graft source with the best evidence for substitution urethroplasty (18–100%). Trends of effectiveness were identified for redo-urethroplasty modalities in different locations. However, the current levels of evidence are limited to small observational studies, highlighting the need for further larger prospective data to evaluate different techniques used for recurrent urethral strictures.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Rosenbaum C, Schmid M, Ludwig T et al (2016) Redo buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty: success rate, oral morbidity and functional outcomes. BJU Int 118(5):797–803 Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ et al (2003) The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol 170:90–92 Rapp DE, Chanduri K, Infusino G et al (2008) Internet survey of management trends of urethral strictures. Urol Int 80:287–290 Rosenbaum CM, Schmid M, Ludwig TA et al (2014) Internal urethrotomy in patients with recurrent urethral stricture after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty. World J Urol 33:1337–1344 Wright JL, Wessells H, Nathens AB et al (2006) What is the most cost-effective treatment for 1 to 2-cm bulbar urethral strictures: societal approach using decision analysis. Urology 67:889–893 Rourke KF, Jordan GH (2005) Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture. J Urol 173:1206–1210 Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott SP et al (2017) Male urethral stricture. American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline. J Urol 197(1):182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.087 Breyer BN, McAninch JW, Whitson JM et al (2010) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term urethroplasty outcome. J Urol 183:613–617 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097 Institute of Health Economics (IHE) (2014) Quality appraisal of case series studies checklist. Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton. http://www.ihe.ca/research-programs/rmd/cssqac/cssqac-about Bargagli G, Selli C, Tosto A (1996) Reoperative surgery for recurrent strictures of the penile and bulbous urethra. J Urol 156:76–77 Blaschko S, McAninch J, Myers J, Schlomer B, Breyer B (2012) Repeat urethroplasty after failed urethral reconstruction: outcome analysis of 130 patients. J Urol 188(6):2260–2264 Gupta N, Mishra S, Dogra P et al (2008) Does a previous end-to-end urethroplasty alter the results of redo end-to-end urethroplasty in patients with traumatic posterior urethral strictures? Int J Urol 15(10):885–888 Ekerhult T, Lindqvist K, Peeker R et al (2016) Outcomes of reintervention after failed urethroplasty. Scand J Urol 51(1):68–72 Bhagat S, Gopalakrishnan G, Kumar S et al (2010) Redo-urethroplasty in pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect: an audit. World J Urol 29(1):97–101 Levine M, Kinnaird A, Rourke K (2014) Revision urethroplasty success is comparable to primary urethroplasty: a comparative analysis. Urology 84(4):928–933 Siegel J, Panda A, Tausch T et al (2015) Repeat excision and primary anastomotic urethroplasty for salvage of recurrent bulbar urethral stricture. J Urol 194(5):1316–1322 Morey A, Duckett C, McAninch J (1997) Failed anterior urethroplasty: guidelines for reconstruction. J Urol 158(4):1383–1387 Wadhwa S, Chahal R, Hemal A et al (1998) Management of obliterative posttraumatic posterior urethral strictures after failed initial urethroplasty. J Urol 159:1898–1902 Joseph J, Andrich D, Leach C et al (2002) Urethroplasty for refractory anterior urethral stricture. J Urol 167:127–129 Shau Y, Wu S, Kao C et al (2015) Management of complex urethral stricture disease: algorithm and experience from a single institute. Urol Sci 26(3):210–213 Jakse G, Marberger H (1986) Excisional repair of urethral stricture follow-up of 90 patients. Urology 27(3):233–236 Orabi S (2008) Re-do posterior urethroplasty: steps to achieve a success. J Urol 179(4):260 Imbeault A, Bugeja S, Frost A et al (2014) 82 The outcome of redo bulbar and membranous urethroplasty. Eur Urol Suppl 13(1):e82 Cavalcanti A, Rubinstein M (2012) 5 redo urethroplasty after failure of end-to-end anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty. J Urol 187(4):e2 Pardeshi A, Raghoji V (2016) 32 Technique of re-do posterior anastomotic urethroplasty for failed pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect. Indian J Urol Suppl 32(Suppl 1):S38–S165 Kulkarni S, Barbagli G, Joshi P et al (2015) Laparoscopic omentoplasty to support anastomotic urethroplasty in complex and redo pelvic fracture urethral defects. Urology 85(5):1200–1205 Patrascoiu S, Gingu C, Surcel C et al (2012) C167 redo anastomotic urethroplasties for pfudds. Eur Urol Suppl 11(4):122 Andrich D, Venkatesan K, Zacharakis E, Mundy AR (2011) The outcome of redo perineal urethroplasty The Institute of Urology, University College Hospital of LondonBJU Int suppl s1, 2011; 108: 1–16 Webster G, Ramon J, Kreder K (1990) Salvage posterior urethroplasty after failed initial repair of pelvic fracture membranous urethral defects. J Urol 144(6):1370–1372 Rosenbaum C, Schmid M, Ludwig T et al (2016) Redo buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty: success rate, oral morbidity and functional outcomes. BJU Int 118(5):797–803 Sevinc C, Balaban M, Ozkaptan O et al (2016) Salvage urethroplasty using skin grafts for previously failed long-segment urethral strictures. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32(9):464–468 Mehrsai A, Djaladat H, Salem S et al (2007) Outcome of buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for long and repeated stricture repair. Urology 69(1):17–21 Pandey A, Borisenkov M, Barta-Kelemen A et al (2017) Re-do urethroplasty after unsuccessful urethral reconstruction with buccal mucosa graft. Eur Urol Suppl 16(3):e485 Javali T, Katti A, Nagaraj H (2016) Management of recurrent anterior urethral strictures following buccal mucosal graft-urethroplasty: a single center experience. Urol Ann 8(1):31 Pfalzgraf D, Kluth L, Reiss P et al (2013) Redo-urethroplasty: comparison of early functional results and quality of life in penile and bulbar strictures. World J Urol 32(5):1191–1197 Tang S, Kao C, Wu S et al (2012) Inlay buccal mucosal graft for reoperative posterior urethroplasty. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 28(4):220–224 Zargooshi J (2004) Tube-onlay-tube tunica vaginalis flap for proximal primary and reoperative adult hypospadias. J Urol 171(1):224–228 Xu Y, Li H, Fu Q et al (2016) One-stage dorsal lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for the treatment of failed hypospadias repair. Asian J Androl 18(3):467 Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Palminteri E et al (2006) Failed hypospadias repair presenting in adults. Eur Urol 49(5):887–895 Mehrsai A, Djaladat H, Sina A et al (2005) Buccal mucosal graft in repeat urethroplasty. Urol J 2(4):206–210 Andrich D, Dalcum N, Holden F et al (2005) 748Restricture rates after revision urethroplasty. Eur Urol Suppl 4(3):189 Grant A, Ahmadi N, Wong J (2017) Outcomes of redo-urethroplasty in patients with prior failed urethral reconstruction surgery. BJU Int Suppl. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13751 Morrison C, Cinà D, Gonzalez C et al (2018) Surgical approaches and long-term outcomes in adults with complex reoperative hypospadias repair. J Urol 199(5):1296–1301 Shenfeld OZ, Gofrit ON, Gdor Y et al (2004) Anastomotic urethroplasty for failed previously treated membranous urethral rupture. Urology 63(5):837–840 Kulkarni SB, Surana S, Desai DJ et al (2018) Management of complex and redo cases of pelvic fracture urethral injuries. Asian J Urol 5(2):107–117 Vetterlein MW, Stahlberg J, Zumstein V et al (2018) The impact of surgical sequence on stricture recurrence after anterior one-stage buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: comparative effectiveness of initial, repeat, and secondary procedures. J Urol 200(6):1308–1314 Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Gonzalez CM (2009) Staged reconstruction of long segment urethral strictures in men with previous paediatric hypospadias repair. J Urol 181(2):685–689 Myers JB, McAninch JW, Erickson BA (2012) Treatment of adults with complications from previous hypospadias surgery. J Urol 88(2):459–463 Meeks J, Erickson B, Granieri M et al (2009) Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol 182(4):1266–1270 Blaschko SD, Breyer BN, McAninch JW (2014) Reoperative urethroplasty. A systematic review. Arch Esp Urol 67(1):138–141