Red Snapper Reproductive Biology in the Southern Gulf of Mexico

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society - Tập 139 Số 4 - Trang 957-968 - 2010
Thierry Brulé1, Teresa Colás‐Marrufo1, Esperanza Pérez‐Díaz1, Juan Carlos Sámano‐Zapata1
1Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional Departamento de Recursos del Mar, Unidad Mérida Antigua Carretera a Progreso km 6, Apartado Postal 73 Cordemex, Código 97310 Mérida Yucatán México

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Sex ratio, size at maturity, reproductive periodicity, ovarian development pattern, and spawning ground data for red snapper Lutjanus campechanus from the southern Gulf of Mexico were analyzed to understand this species' reproductive biology throughout its geographical distribution. Red snapper were sampled in 1999 and 2000 from commercial fishery catches taken on Campeche Bank at depths ranging from 43 to 130 m. Overall sex ratio (male: female) and sex ratios by size‐class did not differ significantly from a 1:1 ratio. First maturity was at a slightly smaller size in males (24.2 cm total length [TL]) than in females (28.3 cm TL), and maximum length percentages at first maturity were 28% for males and 34% for females. The length at which maturity was attained in 50% of females (L50) was 31.4 cm TL. The Campeche Bank red snapper stock had a protracted spawning period from February to November, with a spawning peak occurring in early fall. Vitellogenic oocytes were continually recruited from previtellogenic oocytes during the entire spawning season, with no gap between each oocyte development stage. This means that red snapper ovaries are asynchronous and that the species can be considered a heterochronal (batch) spawner with indeterminate annual fecundity. Females in spawning condition were collected from both the northeastern and northwestern areas of Campeche Bank, near submerged or emergent coral reef structures, and at depths between 48 and 117 m. These results generally agreed with those for red snapper stocks in others regions of the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean off the southeastern United States. However, reproductive periodicity in the Campeche Bank red snapper stock apparently displayed more of an insular pattern of extended spawning in comparison with the typical continental pattern of restricted spawning reported for other regions. The latitudinal differences observed in red snapper spawning seasons could also reflect a latitudinal gradient in the intensity of seasonal environmental constraints.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen G. R., 1985, FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Fisheries Synopsis 125

Allman R. J., Age structure of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the Gulf of Mexico by fishing made and region., Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 53, 482

Bagenal T. B., 1957, The breeding and fecundity of the Long Rough dab, Hippoglossoides platessoides (Fabr.) and the associated cycle in condition, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 39, 339, 10.1017/S0025315400016854

Bannerot S., 1987, Tropical snappers and groupers: Biology and fisheries management, 561

Bradley E., Life history and fishery of the red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico., Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 27, 77

Brown‐Peterson N., Regional differences in Florida red snapper reproduction., Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 61, 149

Brown‐Peterson N., 1988, Reproductive biology of the spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus, in the south Texas, U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin, 86, 373

Camber C. I., 1955, State of Florida Board of Conservation, Technical Series 12

Collins L. A., Preliminary results from a continuing study of spawning and fecundity in the red snapper (Lutjanidae) from the Gulf of Mexico, 1998–1999., Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 52, 34

Collins L. A., Conference Proceedings 48, 174

10.2307/1446105

10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb03876.x

Futch R. B., Proceedings of the Colloquium on Snapper–Grouper Fishery Resources of the Western Atlantic Ocean, 165

Gabe M., 1968, Techniques histologiques (Histological techniques)

García‐Cagide A., 2001, Ecology of the marine fishes of Cuba, 73

González‐y‐de‐la‐Rosa M. E., 2001, Aspectos de la reproducción de Lutjanus campechanus en Campeche, México. [The reproductive aspects of Lutjanus campechanus from Campeche, Mexico.], Ciencia Pesquera, 15, 141

González‐y‐de‐la‐Rosa M. E., 1997, Analysis and diagnosis of critical fisheries resources of the Gulf of Mexico, 289

Grimes C. B., 1987, Tropical snappers and groupers: Biology and fisheries management, 239

Hunter J. R., 1985, Batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes, NOAA Technical Report, 36, 67

Jackson M. W., 2007, Red snapper ecology and fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, 217

10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.00951.x

10.1017/CBO9780511721892

Moe M. A., 1969, Florida Department of Natural Resources Marine Research Laboratory Professional Papers Series 10

Monreal‐Gómez M. A., 2004, Environmental diagnosis of the Gulf of Mexico, 47

Monroy‐García C., Análisis de la pesquería de huachinango (Lutjanus campechanus) en el Banco de Campeche. [Analysis of red snapper fishery (Lutjanus campechanus) from the Campeche bank.]., Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 53, 507

Monroy‐García C., 2001, Responsible sustainable fishery in Mexico. Management and Evaluation, 681

Moseley F. N., 1966, Biology of the red snapper, Lutjanus aya Bloch, of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, Publications of the Institute of Marine Science, 11, 90

10.1577/T05-258.1

Pankhurst N. W., 1998, Biology of farmed fish, 1

Porch C. E., 2007, Red snapper ecology and fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, 229

10.1111/j.1467-2679.2005.00174.x

Rivas L. R., 1968, Fishermen's atlas of monthly sea surface temperatures for the Gulf of Mexico

10.1016/B978-0-08-092551-6.50018-0

10.1007/978-94-015-8779-2_2

SAGARPA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación)., 2002, Anuario estadístico de pesca 2002. [Annual fishery statistics 2002]

SAGARPA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación)., 2005, Anuario estadístico de pesca 2005. [Annual fishery statistics 2005.]

López‐González A., 2006, Diario official de la federación, tomo DCXXXV 19, segunda sección). [Official diary of the federation, volume DCXXXV 19, second section.], 1

Salas S., 2006, ¿Hacia donde van las pesquerías en Yucatán? Tendencias, retos y perspectivas. [What's the future of Yucatan's fisheries? Trends, challenges, and perspectives.]

Scherrer B., 1984, Biostatistique (Biostatistics)

Shapiro D. Y., 1993, Periodicity of sex change and reproduction in the red hind, Epinephelus guttatus, a protogynous grouper, Bulletin of Marine Science, 53, 1151

Simpson A. C., 1951, The fecundity of the plaice, Fishery Investigations, London, Series 2, 17, 1

10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00998.x

Thresher R. E., 1984, Reproduction in reef fishes

Tyler C. R., 1996, Oocyte growth and development in teleosts, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 6, 287, 10.1007/BF00122584

10.1093/icb/21.2.325

10.1071/MF9900199

White D. B., 2004, Age, growth, and reproduction of the red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, from the Atlantic waters of the southeastern U.S, Bulletin of Marine Science, 75, 335

Wiseman W. J., 1999, The Gulf of Mexico large marine ecosystem: Assessment, sustainability and management, 77

Woods K. M., Size and age at maturity of female red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico., Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 54, 526