Hồ sơ tương tác và ra quyết định cho các thách thức về môi trường và sinh thái xã hội

Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. AIP J 35(4):216–224 Bajcsy R, Aloimonos Y, Tsotos JK (2018) Revisiting active perception. Auto Robot 42:177–196 Becker E (2012) Social-ecological systems as epistemic objects. In: Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter BM, Welp M (eds) Human–nature interactions in the anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis, chapter 3. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 37–59 Bednarek AT, Wyborn C, Cvitanovic C et al (2018) Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives. Sustain Sci 13:1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9 Belt MV (2004) Mediated modeling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Boix Mansilla V, Lamont M, Sato K (2016) Shared cognitive—emotional—interactional platforms markers and conditions for successful interdisciplinary collaborations. Sci Commun 41(4):571–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915614103 Bowles N, Hamilton JT, Levy DAL (2014) Introduction. In: Bowles N, Hamilton JT, Levy DAL (eds) Transparency in politics and the media. Reuters Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, pp xi–xxiii Cash D, Clark WC, Alcock F et al (2003a) Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/32067415/Salience_credibility.pdf?sequence=4. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F et al (2003b) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8086–8091. https://www.pnas.org/content/100/14/8086. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Chabay I (2019) Vision, identity, and collective behavior change on pathways to sustainable futures. Evol Inst Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-019-00151-3 Chaffin BC, Craig RK, Gosnell H (2015) Resilience, adaptation, and transformation in the Klamath River Basin social-ecological system. Ida Law Rev 51:157–193. https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-004-015-0003-8 Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Gosnell H, Craig RK (2016) Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA. Environ Sci Policy 57:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.008 Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Craig RK (2018) The emergence of adaptive governance in the Klamath River Basin. In: Cosens B, Gunderson LH (eds) Practical panarchy for adaptive water governance linking law to social-ecological resilience. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–98 Churchman CW (1968) The systems approach. Delta, New York Churchman CW (1979) The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books, New York Cockerill K (2010) Cooperative modeling to promote systems thinking in applying the National Environmental Policy Act. Environ Pract 12:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046610000104 Cockerill K, Tidwell V, Passell HD, Malczynski LA (2007) Cooperative modeling lessons for environmental management. Environ Pract 9:28–41. https://doi.org/10.10170/S1466046607070032 Cockerill K, Daniel L, Malczynski L, Tidwell V (2009) A fresh look at a policy sciences methodology: collaborative modeling for more effective policy. Policy Sci 42:211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9080-8 Cockerill K, Armstrong M, Richter J, Okie JG (2017) Environmental realism: challenging solutions, 1st edn. Palgrave Macmillan, London Colding J, Barthel S (2019) Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecol Soc 24(1):2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10598-240102 Cook FL, Jacobs LR, Kim D (2010) Trusting what you know: information, knowledge and confidence in Social Security. J Polym 72(2):397–412 Cornell S, Berkhout F, Tuinstra W et al (2013) Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environ Sci Policy 28:60–70 D’Mello S, Kappas A, Gratch J (2018) The affective computing approach to affect measurement. Emot Rev 10(2):174–183 de Fine Licht J (2011) Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy. Scand Pol Stud 34(3):183–201 Doremus H, Tarlock AD (2008) Water war in the Klamath Basin: Macho law, combat biology, and dirty politics. Island Press, Washington, DC Duit A, Galaz V, Eckerberg K, Ebbesson J (2010) Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob Environ Chang 20:363–368 Etzioni A (2010) Is transparency the best disinfectant? J Political Philos 18(4):389–404 Flint-Advisory-Task-Force (2016) Flint water advisory task force final report. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/snyder/FWATF_FINAL_REPORT_21March2016_517805_7.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Florini A (ed) (2007) The right to know: transparency for an open world. Columbia University Press, New York Franco LA, Hämäläinen RP (2016a) Engaging with behavioural OR: on methods, actors, and praxis. In: Kunc M, Malpass J, White L (eds) Behavioral operational research: theory, methodology and practice. Palgrave, London, pp 3–25 Franco LA, Hämäläinen RP (2016b) Behavioural operational research: returning to the roots of the OR profession. Eur J Oper Res 249:791–795 Franco LA, Montibeller G (2010) Facilitated modelling in operational research. Eur J Oper Res 205:489–500 Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755 Ghasemi A, Denman S, Sridharan S, Fookes C (2016) Discovery of facial motions using deep machine perception. In: 2016 IEEE winter conference on applications of computer vision (WACV), 7–10 March 2016, Lake Placid, NY. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7469250/proceeding. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter B, Welp M (2008) Human–nature-interaction in the Anthropocene. Potential of social-ecological systems analysis. Gaia 17(1):77–80 Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter B, Welp M (2012) Human–nature-interaction in the Anthropocene. Potential of social-ecological systems analysis. Routledge Studies in Environment, Culture, and Society, Routledge, New York Glynn PD (2014) W(h)ither the Oracle? Cognitive biases and other human challenges of integrated environmental modeling. In: Ames DP, Quinn NWT, Rizzoli AE (eds) 7th International congress on environment modelling and software. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, San Diego, p 8. http://former.iemss.org/sites/iemss2014/. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Glynn PD (2017) Integrated environmental modelling: human decisions, human challenges. In: Riddick AT, Kessler H, Giles JRA (eds) Integrated environmental modelling to solve real world problems: methods, vision and challenges. Geological Society of London, London Glynn PD, Voinov AA, Shapiro CD, White PA (2017) From data to decisions: processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments. Earths Future. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000487 Glynn P, Shapiro C, Voinov A (2018a) Records of engagement and decision tracking for adaptive management and policy development. IEEE Int Symp Technol Soc Proc. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911003637014 Glynn PD, Voinov AA, Shapiro CD, White PA (2018b) Response to comment by Walker et al. on “From data to decisions: processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments”. Earths Future 6:762–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018EF000819 Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Wiley-Blackwell, New York Grimmelikhuijsen S, Porumbescu G, Hong B, Im T (2013) The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Admin Rev 73(4):575–586 Hämäläinen RP (2015) Behavioural issues in environmental modelling—the missing perspective. Environ Model Softw 73:244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.019 Hämäläinen RP, Saarinen E (2008) Systems intelligence—the way forward? A note on Ackoff’s “why few organizations adopt systems thinking”. Syst Res Behav Sci 25:821–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.904 Hämäläinen RP, Luoma J, Saarinen E (2013) On the importance of behavioral operational research: the case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems. Eur J Oper Res 228:623–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.001 Hämäläinen RP, Jones R, Saarinen E (2014) Being better: living with systems intelligence. Aalto University, Helsinki Hämäläinen RP, Saarinen E, Törmänen J (2018) Systems intelligence: a core competence for next-generation engineers? In: 2018 IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering (TALE). pp 641–644. https://doi.org/10.1109/tale.2018.8615247. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Heink U, Marquard E, Heubach K et al (2015) Conceptualizing credibility, relevance and legitimacy for evaluating the effectiveness of science–policy interfaces: challenges and opportunities. Sci Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu082 Helgeson J, van der Linden S, Chabay I (2012) “The role of knowledge, learning and mental models in public perceptions of climate change related risks. In: Wals A, Corcoran P (eds) Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Amsterdam Henrick EC, Cobb P, Penuel WR, et al (2017) Assessing research-practice partnerships: five dimensions of effectiveness. William T Grant Foundation. http://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2017/10/Assessing-Research-Practice-Partnerships.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Holzner B, Holzner L (2006) Transparency in global change: the vanguard of the open society. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh Horangic A, Berry KA, Wall T (2016) Influences on stakeholder participation in water negotiations: a case study from the Klamath Basin. Soc Nat Resour 29:1421–1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1144837 Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York Kaner S, Lind L, Toldi C, Fisk S, Berger D (2007) Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Kiker TA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1(2):95–108 Kilgour M, Eden C (eds) (2010) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Berlin Kjaer AM (2010) Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge Lienert J, Scholten L, Egger C, Maurer M (2015) Structured decision-making for sustainable water infrastructure planning and four future scenarios. EURO J Decis Process 3:107–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-014-0030-0 Linkov I, Moberg E (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis—environmental applications and case studies. Taylor and Francis, London Lopez J, Tielbörger C, Claus C et al (2019) A transdisciplinary approach to identifying transboundary tipping points in a contentious area: experiences from across the Jordan River region. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11:1–20 Lynch DD, Risley JC (2003) Klamath River basin hydrologic conditions prior to the September 2002 die-off of salmon and steelhead. Water Resour Investig Rep 03-4099. US Geological Survey McKay PA, Vogt CA, Olabisi LS (2017) Development and testing a diagnostic capacity tool for improving socio-ecological system governance. Environ Syst Decis 37:156–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9611-8 McKay PA, Olabisi LS, Vogt CA (2019) Assessing improvements in socio-ecological system governance using mixed methods, and the quality governance framework and its diagnostic capacity tool. Environ Syst Decis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-019-09744-0 Meadows DH (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, Hartford Meyfroidt P (2013) Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview. J Land Use Sci 8:341–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2012.667452 National Research Council (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC O’Neill O (2006) Transparency and the ethics of communication. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford Univ Press for the British Academy, Oxford, pp 75–90 Partelow S (2018) A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecol Soc 23(4):36. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10594-230436 Picard RW (1995) Affective computing. M.I.T Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 321. https://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/95.picard.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Pomerol JC (1997) Artificial intelligence and human decision making. Eur J Oper Res 99:3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00378-5 Post MA, Ward E, Longo NV, Saltmarsh J (eds) (2016) Publicly engaged scholars: next generation engagement and the future of higher education. Stylus Publishing, Sterling Prouty C, Mohebbi S, Zhang Q (2018) Socio-technical strategies and behavior change to increase the adoption and sustainability of wastewater resource recovery systems. Water Res 137:107–119 Ravetz JR (1996) Scientific knowledge and its social problems, 2nd edn. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick Reed MS et al (2018) A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restor Ecol 26(S1):S7–S17 Rhodes R (1999) Forward. In: Stoker G (ed) The new management of British local level governance. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, p xviii Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 Roberts A (2006) Dashed expectations: governmental adaptation to transparency rules. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford Univ Press for the British Academy, Oxford, pp 107–126 Robertson DA (2016) Agent based models and behavioral operational research. In: Kunc M, Malpass J, White L (eds) Behavioral operational research. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–159 Roeser S, Pesch U (2016) An emotional deliberation approach to risk. Sci Commun 41(2):274–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915596231 Saltmarsh J, Hartley M (eds) (2012) To serve a larger purpose: engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Temple University Press, Philadelphia Sato T, Chabay I, Helgeson J (eds) (2018) Transformations of social-ecological systems: studies in co-creating integrated knowledge toward sustainable futures. Springer, Singapore Schuman S (ed) (2005) The IAF handbook of group facilitation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Stasavage D (2006) Does transparency make a different? The example of the European Council of Ministers. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford Univ Press for the British Academy, Oxford, pp 165–179 Stöhr C, Chabay I (2014) From shouting matches to productive dialogue—establishing stakeholder participation in Polish fisheries governance. Int J Sustain Dev 17:403–419 Susskind L, Levy P, Thomas-Larmer J (1999a) Negotiating environmental agreements. Island Press, Washington, DC Susskind L, McKearnen S, Thomas-Lamar J (1999b) The consensus building handbook: a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks Snyder R (2016) U.S. House oversight and government reform committee testimony. MLive. https://www.mlive.com/news/2016/03/read_gov_snyders_flint_water_c.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2019 Tàbara JD, Chabay I (2013) Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social-ecological systems change: reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 28:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.005 Todt O, Lujan JL (2014) Values and decisions: cognitive and noncognitive values in knowledge generation and decision making. Sci Commun 39(5):720–743. https://doi.org/10.0177/0162243914521019 Walker W, Marchau V, Bloemen P, Lawrence J (2018) A response to Glynn et al. “From data to decisions: processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments”. Earths Future 6:757–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000750 Wildavsky A (1979) Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis. Little, Brown, Boston