Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review

Andrea Volpin1, Sujith Konan1, Carlo Biz2, Rosamond J. Tansey1, Fares S. Haddad1
1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College London Hospital, London, UK
2Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Padova, Padua, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96A(8):624–630

Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA (2012) Hip arthroplasty. Lancet 380(9855):1768–1777

Jain S, Grogan RJ, Giannoudis PV (2014) Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review. Hip Int 24(2):109–122

Baauw M, van Hooff ML, Spruit M (2016) Current construct options for revision of large acetabular defects: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 4(11). https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00119

Nieminen J, Pakarinen TK, Laitinen M (2013) Orthopaedic reconstruction of complex pelvic bone defects. Evaluation of various treatment methods. Scand J Surg 102(1):36–41

van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Collabora EBC (2003) Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 28(12):1290–1299

Malmivaara A, Koes BW, Bouter LM, van Tulder MW (2006) Applicability and clinical relevance of results in randomized controlled trials: the Cochrane review on exercise therapy for low back pain as an example. Spine 31(13):1405–1409

Korim MT, Esler CNA, Ashford RU (2014) Systematic review of proximal femoral arthroplasty for non-neoplastic conditions. J Arthroplast 29(11):2117–2121

Berasi CC, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL Jr, Lombardi AV (2015) Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):528–535

Wind MA Jr, Swank ML, Sorger JI (2013) Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Orthopedics 36(3):e260–e265

Colen S, Harake R, De Haan J, Mulier M (2013) A modified custom-made triflanged acetabular reconstruction ring (MCTARR) for revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular defects. Acta Orthop Belg 79(1):71–75

Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ (2012) Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):428–434

DeBoer DK, Christie MJ, Brinson MF, Morrison JC (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):835–840

Dennis DA (2003) Management of massive acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 18(3 Suppl 1):121–125

Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK (2001) Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:216–227

von Roth P, Abdel MP, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ (2015) Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97A(4):284–287

Gustke KA, Levering MF, Miranda MA (2014) Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects. J Arthroplast 29(1):199–203

Lachiewicz PE, Soileau ES (2013) Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95A(6):543–548

Bilgen OF, Bilgen MS, Oncan T, Danis M (2012) Acetabular reconstruction by impacted cancellous allografts in cementless total hip arthroplasty revision. Acta Orthop Traumatol 46(2):120–125

Fan CY, Chen WM, Lee OK, Huang CK, Chiang CC, Chen TH (2008) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(8):809–813

Wedemeyer C, Neuerburg C, Heep H, von Knoch F, von Knoch M, Loer F et al (2008) Jumbo cups for revision of acetabular defects after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of a case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(6):545–550

Patel JV, Masonis JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (2003) The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 18(2):129–133

St’astny E, Trc T, Handl M, Kos P, Kautzner J, Philippou T et al (2014) Mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty using the oval-shaped uncemented Trc-Cingr cup. Int Orthop 38(5):935–940

Garcia-Rey E, Fernandez-Fernandez R, Duran D, Madero R (2013) Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol Off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol 14(1):39–49

Desai AS, Dramis A, Board TN, Hekal W, Farhan MJ (2012) Acetabular revision surgery with the uncemented oblong BOFOR Cup–early to midterm results. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Therapy 22(3):280–285

Koster G, Rading S (2009) Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(5):603–608

Civinini R, Capone A, Carulli C, Villano M, Gusso MI (2008) Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results. Int Orthop 32(2):189–193

Kmiec K, Dorman T, Andrzej G, Synder M, Kozlowski P, Sibinski M (2015) Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts. Indian J Orthop 49(3):317–322

Mao YQ, Xu C, Xu JW, Li HW, Liu FX, Yu DG et al (2015) The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects. Int Orthop 39(10):2023–2030

Amenabar T, Rahman WA, Hetaimish BM, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE (2016) Promising mid-term results with a cup-cage construct for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):408–414

Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I (2014) Acetabular reconstruction with the burch-schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results. Biomed Res Int 2014:194076

Philippe R, Gosselin O, Sedaghatian J, Dezaly C, Roche O, Sirveaux F et al (2012) Acetabular reconstruction using morselized allograft and a reinforcement ring for revision arthroplasty with Paprosky type II and III bone loss: survival analysis of 95 hips after 5 to 13 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg 98(2):129–137

Lamo-Espinosa J, Duart Clemente J, Diaz-Rada P, Pons-Villanueva J, Valenti-Nin JR (2013) The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results. Musculoskelet Surg 97(1):31–37

Jones L, Grammatopoulos G, Singer G (2012) The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up. Hip Int 22(1):28–34

Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 97(8):807–813

Akiyama H, Yamamoto K, Tsukanaka M, Kawanabe K, Otsuka H, So K et al (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1194–1200

Hori J, Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Yoshida T, Oshima S, Yamasaki K et al (2012) Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device. Int Orthop 36(1):23–26

Coscujuela-Mana A, Angles F, Tramunt C, Casanova X (2010) Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Therapy 20(Suppl 7):S112–S118

Regis D, Magnan B, Sandri A, Bartolozzi P (2008) Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss. J Arthroplast 23(6):826–832

Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2006) Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years. Acta Orthop 77(2):234–241

Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE (2009) Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(7):870–876

Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2010) Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):454–458

Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE (2013) Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J 95B(2):166–172

Borland WS, Bhattacharya R, Holland JP, Brewster NT (2012) Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss early to medium-term results. Acta Orthop 83(4):347–352

Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, Fernandes J (2011) Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplast 26(8):1245–1250

Del Gaizo DJ, Kancherla V, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2012) Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(2):395–401

Elganzoury I, Bassiony AA (2013) Early results of trabecular metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 79(5):530–535

Fernandez-Fairen M, Murcia A, Blanco A, Merono A, Murcia A, Ballester J (2010) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty acetabular cups to porous tantalum components a 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 25(6):865–872

Flecher X, Paprosky W, Grillo JC, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2010) Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions? Orthop Traumatol Surg 96(3):235–241

Grappiolo G, Loppini M, Longo UG, Traverso F, Mazziotta G, Denaro V (2015) Trabecular metal augments for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplast 30(6):1024–1029

Kim WY, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS (2008) Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results. Hip Int 18(1):17–22

Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE (2009) Trabecular metal (TM) cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(9):2318–2324

Molicnik A, Hanc M, Recnik G, Krajnc Z, Rupreht M, Fokter SK (2014) Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Orthop Traumatol 24(6):911–917

Simon JP, Bellemans J (2009) Clinical and radiological evaluation of modular trabecular metal acetabular cups short-term results in 64 hips. Acta Orthop Belg 75(5):623–630

Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T (2005) Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplast 20(8):1002–1009

Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, Nelson CL, Garino JP (2009) Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplast 24(6):64–68

Weeden SH, Schmidt RH (2007) The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplast 22(6):151–155

Whitehouse MR, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2015) Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):521–527