Reconfiguring Child and Parental Rights: A Case for Coerced Contraception

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal - Tập 22 - Trang 459-475 - 2005
Charles F. Thurber1
1University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Tóm tắt

Flagrant child abuse and neglect touches community sensibilities and suggests the option of coerced contraception in dealing with irresponsible contraception. This idea is resisted by the notion that the right to reproduce is fundamental. Law and ethics uphold this right, seeing it grounded in privacy and bodily integrity. Gender, race and class issues also argue against the idea of coerced contraception. This essay challenges these traditional positions by constructing a case for coerced contraception from several viewpoints. On balance, the right to reproduce has considerably less legal and moral weight compared to the birthright of the child not to be harmed and to have an open future. Examined critically, coerced contraception does not represent an unusual or excessive burden. Strict scrutiny and due process issues are addressed in allowing coerced contraception to become public policy. Various objections to this thesis are anticipated and answered. These include, but are not limited to, the ideas that personal dignity and the physician patient relationship are endangered and that a slippery slope would lead to greater restrictions on personal freedom.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arras J., Blustein J., 1996. Reproductive responsibility and long-term contraception In Moskowitz E., Jennings B. Eds. Coerced Contraception: Moral and policy challenges of long-acting birth control Georgetown University Press Washington, DC 108–133 Berlin F., 1977. Chemical castration of sex offenders New England Journal of Medicine 336(14): 1030 Brown G., 1996. Long-acting contraceptives: Rationale, current developments, and ethical Implications In Moskowitz E., Jennings B. Eds. Coerced contraception: Moral and policy challenges of long-acting birth control Georgetown University Press Washington, DC 34–50 Boyle R., Spencer E., 1995. Decisions about treatment of newborns, infants and children In Fletcher J., Hite C., Lombardo P., Marshall M. Eds. Introduction to clinical ethics University Publishing Group Frederik, MD 161–178 Buck v Bell, 274 US 200 (1927) Burkman R., 2000. Update on contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 27(4): 3118–3122 Butterfield, F. (2000). Studies show racial divide in domestic violence cases. New York Times, May 18, 2000, A16 Callahan J., 1993. The contract motherhood debate Journal of Clinical Ethics 4(1): 82–91 Callahan, J. (1995). Contraception or incarceration: what’s wrong with this picture? Stanford Law and Policy Review, (winter 1995–1996), 27–51 Chawkin W., 1991. Mandatory treatment of drug use in pregnancy Journal of the American Medical Association 266: 1550–1561 Childress, J., Wadlington, W., & Abrams, A. (1986). Religious and philosophical perspectives on contraception and abortion. Biolaw 1 (pp. 69–73). Frederick, MD: University Publications of America Cleveland Board of Education v LaFeur, et al. (1973). 414 US. 632 Cole H., 1990. Legal interventions during pregnancy: court ordered medical treatment and legal penalties for potentially harmful behaviors by pregnant women Journal of the American Medical Association 264: 2063–2070 Davis D., 1997. Genetic dilemma and the child’s right to an open future Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27(2): 7–15 Davis D., 2000. Legal trends in bioethics Journal of Clinical Ethics 11(2): 188 Dube S., Auda R., Felitt V., et al. 2001. Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout life span Journal of the American Medical Association 280(2): 3089–3096 Dunn R., 1975. Eugenic sterilization statutes: constitutional re-examination Journal of Fami1y Law 280: 304–305 Eisenstadt v Baird (1973). 405 US 113 Gasner M., Maw K., Feldman G., et al. 1999. The use of legal action in New York City to ensure treatment of tuberculosis New England Journal of Medicine 340: 359–366 Gallagher J., 1987. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what’s wrong with fetal rights? Harvard Women’s Law Review 10: 9–58 Glendon M., 1991. The missing language of responsibility. Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse The Free Press New York 76–108 Gustin, L. (2000). Public health law in the new century: public health power and limits. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(22), 2979–2984; Public health law in the new century: public health regulation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(23), 3118–3122 Goodman, E. (2002). Registries: protection of punishment? Daily Progress (Charlottesville, VA), November 19, 2002, Dl Griswald v Connecticut, (1965) 381 US 479 Hafer B., 1983. The constitutional status of marriage, kinship, and sexual privacy: balancing individual and social concerns Michigan Law Review 81: 463–493 Macklin R., 1995. Rights In Reich W. Ed. Encyclopedia of bioethics volume 4 MacMillan New York 2305–2316 Macklin R., 1997a. Cultural differences and long-term contraception. In Moskowitz E., Jennings B. Ed. Coerced contraception: Moral and policy challenges of long–acting birth control Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC 173–191 Macklin, R. (1997b). Consent, coercion, and conflict of rights. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, (Spring 1997), 360–371 Marner W., Gantz L., Annas G., 1990. Pregnancy, drugs, and the perils of persecution Criminal Justice Ethics 9(1): 30–41 Meyer v Nebraska, (1965) 262 US 390, 400 Monohan J., Bonnie R., Applebaum P., et al. 2001. Mandated community treatment: Beyond outpatient commitment Developments in Mental Health Law 21(1): 1–18 Mondgal N., Jeyakuman M., Krishnamurthy H., 1997. Development of male contraceptive vaccine: A perspective Human Reproduction Update 3: 335–346 O’Neil O., 1977. Begetting, bearing, and rearing In O’Neil O., Ruddick W. Eds. Having children: Philosophical and legal reflections on parenthood Oxford University Press New York 25–38 Posner R., 1993. Sex and reason Harvard University Press Cambridge 243–266 Powerly K., 1996. Contraceptive policy and ethics: Moral and policy challenges of long-acting birth control In Moskowitz E., Jennings B. Eds. Coerced contraception: Moral and policy challenges of long-acting birth control Georgetown University Press Washington, DC 23–33 Robertson J., 1996. Norplant and irresponsible reproduction In Moskowitz E., Jennings B. Eds. Coerced contraception: Moral and policy challenges of long-acting birth control Georgetown University Press Washington, DC 79–107 Roe v Wade, (1973) 410 US 113 Shaw S., 1984. Conditional perspectives on rights of the fetus The Journal of Legal Medicine 5: 63–116 Sell v United States, (2003) No. 02–5664 Sherwin, S. (1998). Ethics of babymaking. Hastings Center Report, 2 (Mar–Apr), 34–39 Singer L., Arendt S., Minnes S., et al. 2002. Cognitive and motor outcomes of cocaine exposed infants Journal of the American Medical.Association 297(15): 1952–1960 Skinner v Oklahoma, (1923) 316 US 390, 400 State v Oakley, (2002) 239 Wis. 2d 235, 619 N.W. 2d 308 Steefil D., 1977. Preconception torts: Foreseeing the unconceived University of Colorado Law Review 621: 621–639 Steinboch B., 1986. A logical case for wrongful life Hasting Center Report 27(2): 15–21 Steinboch B., 1992. Beyond abortion: The legal status of the fetus. Life before birth Oxford University Press New York 89–126 Steinboch B., McClamrod R., 1994. When is birth unfair to the child? Hastings Center Report 6: 15–22 United Nations Declaration of Rights of the Child (1996). In O. O’Neil, & W. Ruddick (Eds.), Having children: Philosophical and legal reflections on parenthood (pp. 112–114). New York: Oxford University Press Veltkamp, L., McNally, K., Paines P., et al. (1997). Brutalized child, brutal killer. Hospital Practice, 32 (Aug 15), 199–212 Walker E., Gelfand A., Katon M., et al. 1999. Adult status of women with histories of childhood abuse and neglect American Journal of Medicine 107: 332–339 Walker K., 1993. Judicial control of reproductve freedom: The use of norplant as a condition of probation Iowa Law Review 78(3): 779–812 Whitehead, J. (2001). Abortion takes greatest toll on minorities. Daily Progress (Charlottesville, VA), June 24, 2001, A16