Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging - Tập 18 Số 3 - Trang 254-275 - 2017
Helmut Baumgartner1, Judy Hung2, Javier Bermejo3, John B. Chambers4, Thor Edvardsen5, Steven A. Goldstein6, Patrizio Lancellotti7, Melissa LeFevre8, Fletcher A. Miller9, Catherine M Otto10
1Division of Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
2Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
3Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain
4Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
5Department of Cardiology and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
6Heart Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
7Universtiy of Liège Hospital, GIGA Cardiovascular Science, Heart Valve Clinic, Imaging Cardiology, Liège, Belgium and Gruppo Villa Maria Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
8Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
9Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota USA
10Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2014, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Circulation, 129, e521, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000031

Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), 2012, Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012), Eur Heart J, 33, 2451, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109

2004, Crossing the aortic valve in severe aortic stenosis: no longer acceptable?, J Heart Valve Dis, 13, 344

2009, Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 22, 1, 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029

2005, Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation, Circulation, 111, 920, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155623.48408.C5

1999, Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves, Heart, 82, 19, 10.1136/hrt.82.1.19

2007, Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta, Am J Cardiol, 99, 686, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.118

2000, Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis, N Engl J Med, 343, 611, 10.1056/NEJM200008313430903

2013, Cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy, Am J Cardiol, 2013, 1688

2012, Aortic annulus area assessment by multidetector computed tomography for predicting paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, Am Heart J, 164, 576, 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.024

2013, Cardiac computed tomography and computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation, Curr Opin Cardiol, 28, 497, 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32836245c1

1985, Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients, Circulation, 71, 1162, 10.1161/01.CIR.71.6.1162

1986, Value and limitations of continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography in estimating severity of valvular stenosis, J Am Med Assoc, 255, 3145, 10.1001/jama.1986.03370220107037

1993, Echocardiographic volume flow and stenosis severity measures with changing flow rate in aortic stenosis, Am J Physiol, 265, 1734

1997, Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome, Circulation, 95, 2262, 10.1161/01.CIR.95.9.2262

1995, Cardiac index quantification by Doppler ultrasound in patients without left ventricular outflow tract abnormalities, J Am Coll Cardiol, 25, 710, 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00456-Z

1990, Determination of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography using the continuity equation: a critical evaluation, Cardiology, 77, 101, 10.1159/000174590

1988, Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness, Arch Intern Med, 148, 2553, 10.1001/archinte.1988.00380120023006

1988, Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients, J Am Coll Cardiol, 11, 1227, 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90286-0

1986, Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 7, 509, 10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80460-0

1996, Correspondence of aortic valve area determined from transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization, Am Heart J, 132, 1163, 10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90459-7

2011, Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement, Eur J Radiol, 80, 151, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.015

2003, Clinical efficacy of Doppler echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: a comparative test-based analysis of outcome, J Am Coll Cardiol, 41, 142, 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02627-X

1999, Overestimation’ of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery, J Am Coll Cardiol, 33, 1655, 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00066-2

1996, Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro, Circulation, 94, 1934, 10.1161/01.CIR.94.8.1934

1999, The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis, Heart, 82, 11, 10.1136/hrt.82.1.11

2005, Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment, J Am Coll Cardiol, 46, 291, 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.081

1996, Effects of dobutamine on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis, J Am Coll Cardiol, 28, 1206, 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00287-2

1994, Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis, Circulation, 89, 827, 10.1161/01.CIR.89.2.827

2006, Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study, Circulation, 113, 711, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678

1992, Clinical application of transpulmonary contrastenhanced Doppler technique in the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis, J Am Coll Cardiol, 20, 973, 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90200-7

2008, American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 21, 1179, 10.1016/j.echo.2008.09.009

1986, Accurate non-invasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocar- diography, Circulation, 73, 452, 10.1161/01.CIR.73.3.452

1985, Noninvasvie estimation of valve area in patients with aoertic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography, Circulation, 72, 810, 10.1161/01.CIR.72.4.810

2015, Low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: reclassification of severity by fusion of Doppler and computed tomographic data, Eur Heart J, 36, 2087, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv188

2009, Direct measurement of left ventricular outflow tract by transthoracic real-time 3D-echocardiography increases accuracy in assessment of aortic valve stenosis, Int J Cardiol, 136, 64, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.04.070

2012, Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 25, 749, 10.1016/j.echo.2012.05.001

2015, Differential left ventricular outflow tract remodeling and dynamics in aortic stenosis, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 28, 1259, 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.018

2013, Impact of three-dimensional echocardiography on classification of the severity of aortic stenosis, Ann Thorac Surg, 96, 1343, 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.018

2004, Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography, Eur Heart J, 25, 199, 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.12.002

2002, Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies, J Am Coll Cardiol, 40, 1479, 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02269-6

1992, Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 20, 1160, 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90373-U

2005, Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis, Circulation, 112(9 Suppl), I377

1997, Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis, J Am Coll Cardiol, 30, 753, 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00200-3

1996, Value of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic valve area in aortic stenosis, Am J Cardiol, 77, 882, 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89190-4

1991, Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis, Am Heart J, 122, 1415, 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90585-6

2002, Aortic stenosis, NEJM, 346, 677, 10.1056/NEJMcp010846

2010, Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function, Heart, 96, 1463, 10.1136/hrt.2009.181982

2013, Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important?, Heart, 99, 921, 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302881

2001, Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 37, 2101, 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01339-0

2002, Low-output, low-gradient aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function: the clinical utility of the dobutamine challenge in the catheterization laboratory, Circulation, 106, 809, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000025611.21140.34

2003, Low-gradient aortic stenosis operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics, Circulation, 108, 319, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079171.43055.46

2010, Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 23, 380, 10.1016/j.echo.2010.02.002

2012, Outcomes of pseudo-severe aortic stenosis under conservative treatment, Eur Heart J, 33, 2426, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs176

2007, Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival, Circulation, 115, 2856, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681

2012, Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 60, 1845, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.051

2013, Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 6, 175, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.10.015

2011, Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction, Heart, 97, 721, 10.1136/hrt.2010.198853

2013, The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 62, 2329, 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621

2013, Sex differences in aortic valve calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography in aortic stenosis, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 6, 40, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.980052

2013, Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, Circulation, 128, 622, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001094

2013, Differential left ventricular remodelling and longitudinal function distinguishes low flow from normal-flow preserved ejection fraction low-gradient severe aortic stenosis, Eur Heart J, 34, 1906, 10.1093/eurheartj/eht094

2013, Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival, Circulation, 128, 1781, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695

2015, Resting aortic valve area at normal transaortic flow rate reflects true valve area in suspected low-gradient severe aortic stenosis, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 8, 1133, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.021

2010, Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study, Eur J Echocardiogr, 11, 537, 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq014

2009, Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement, Eur Heart J, 30, 3037, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp351

2013, Longitudinal left ventricular 2D strain is superior to ejection fraction in predicting myocardial recovery and symptomatic improvement after aortic valve implantation, Int J Cardiol, 167, 2239, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.012

2008, A novel mechanism of heart failure with normal ejection fraction, Heart, 94, 446

2009, Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, Circulation, 120, 577, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.847772

2010, Prognostic effect of long-axis left ventricular dysfunction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in asymptomatic aortic stenosis, Am J Cardiol, 105, 383, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.043

2012, Global longitudinal strain is a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging., 13, 827, 10.1093/ehjci/jes115

2012, Global strain in severe aortic valve stenosis: Relation to clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 5, 613, 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.973834

2015, Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 16, 1, 10.1093/ehjci/jeu184

2011, Prognostic value of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, Heart, 97, 301, 10.1136/hrt.2010.192997

2013, Outcome of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease, J Am Coll Cardiol, 61, 1489, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.070

Recommendations for non-invasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, J Am Soc Echocardiogr

2008, Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro, Eur Heart J, 29, 2049, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn209

2005, Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis, Heart, 91, 354, 10.1136/hrt.2003.030601

2007, Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis, Heart, 93, 848, 10.1136/hrt.2006.098392

2006, Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of inter-vention, J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, 2141, 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.002

2010, Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis, Circulation, 121, 151, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170

2012, Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Characteristics and outcomes, J Am Coll Cardiol., 60, 2325, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.988

2010, Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis, Eur Heart J, 31, 1390, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq076

2012, Prognostic value of mild-to-moderate pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement, Clin Res Cardiol, 101, 81, 10.1007/s00392-011-0367-3

2012, Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, Circulation, 126, 851, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.088427

2012, Frequency, determinants and outcome of pulmonary hypertension in patients with aortic valve stenosis, Am J Med Sci, 343, 397, 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182309431

2013, Effect of preoperative pulmonary hypertension on outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis following surgical aortic valve replacement, The Am J Cardiol, 112, 1635, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.025

2013, Impact of pulmonary hypertension on mortality after operation for isolated aortic valve stenosis, Int J Cardiol, 168, 3556, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.001