Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education

David H. Cropley1, Arthur J. Cropley2,3
1University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
2Adelaide, Australia
3University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.

Amabile, T. M., & Tighe, E. (1993). Questions of creativity. In J. Brockman (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 7–27). New York: Simon and Schuster.

Bacon, F. (1899 [1604]). Advancement of learning and Novum Organum. New York: The Colonial Press.

Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–178.

Barron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Brady, E. B. (1970). The effects of creativity and intelligence on teacher ratings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 342–344.

Brandau, H., Daghofer, F., Hollerer, L., Kaschnitz, W., Kellner, K., Kirchmair, G., et al. (2007). The relationship between creativity, teacher ratings on behaviour, age, and gender in pupils from seven to ten years. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 91–113.

Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 1–30). New York: Atherton.

Cattell, R. B., & Butcher, H. J. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. New York: Academic Press.

Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 83–114). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Cropley, A. J. (2005). Creativity and problem-solving: Implications for classroom assessment (24th Vernon-Wall Lecture, Glasgow, 6th November 2004). Leicester: British Psychological Society.

Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Elements of a universal aesthetic of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3, 155–161.

Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dawson, V. L., D’Andrea, T., Affito, R., & Westby, E. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A reexamination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 57–66.

Descartes, R. (1991 [1644]). Principles of philosophy (V. R. Miller & R. P. Miller, Trans.) Boston: Kluwer.

Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 389–402.

Fasko, D. (2000–2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–328.

Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teachers’ attitudes and practices in teaching creativity and problem solving to economically disadvantaged and minority children. Psychological Reports, 37, 1161–1162.

Gautier, T. (1998 [1836]). Mademoiselle de Maupin. Paris: Editions bibliopolis.

Haller, C. S., Courvoisier, D. S., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Can functional creativity be objectified? (submitted).

Heinelt, G. (1974). Kreative Lehrer/kreative Schüler [Creative teachers/creative students]. Freiburg: Herder.

Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationships between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208.

Howieson, N. (1984). Is Western Australia neglecting the creative potential of its youth? Paper presented at the 1984 annual conference of the Australian Psychological Society, Perth, August 12–17.

Huang, T.-Y. (2005). Fostering creativity: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, A&M University, College Station, TX. Retrieved on January 15, 2008, from http://handle.tamu.edu/1969.1/2338 .

International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy—content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.

Karwowksi, M. (2007). Teachers’ nominations of students’ creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? The Social Sciences, 2, 264–269.

Kimbell, R. (2001). Assessment of design and technology. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Teaching design and technology in secondary schools (pp. 223–234). London: Routledge.

Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity—a framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17, 35–52.

Maier, M. W., & Rechtin, E. (2000). The art of systems architecting (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Maslow, A. H. (1973). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creative question (pp. 86–92). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond “The Design Process”: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 117–128.

May, R. (1976). The courage to create. New York: Bantam.

Obuche, N. M. (1986). The ideal pupil as perceived by Nigerian (Igbo) teachers and Torrance’s creative personality. International Review of Education, 32, 191–196.

Oral, G., & Guncer, B. (1993). Relationship between creativity and nonconformity to school discipline as perceived by teachers of Turkish elementary school children, by controlling for their grade and sex. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 208–214.

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–328.

Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.

Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.

Tan, A. G. (2003). Student teachers’ perceptions of student behaviors for fostering creativity: A perspective on the academically low achievers. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 13, 59–71.

Vosburg, S. K. (1998). Mood and quantity and quality of ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 315–324.