Receptividad uterina e implantación embrionaria: aporte de la ecografía y del Doppler a la evaluación de la fecundación in vitro

EMC - Ginecología-Obstetricia - Tập 52 - Trang 1-6 - 2016
N. Lédée1, C. Ferretti2
1Service de procréation médicalement assistée, Hôpital des Bluets, 4, rue Lasson, 75010 Paris, France
2Diagnostic Fertilité, 72, rue Ampère, 75017 Paris, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Edwards, 2006, Human implantation: the last barrier in assisted reproduction technologies?, Reprod Biomed Online, 13, 887, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61039-5 Kasius, 2014, Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum Reprod Update, 20, 530, 10.1093/humupd/dmu011 Zhao, 2014, Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle, Reprod Biomed Online, 29, 291, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011 Friedler, 1996, The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review, Hum Reprod Update, 2, 323, 10.1093/humupd/2.4.323 Ahmadi, 2014, Uterine cavity assessment in infertile women: sensitivity and specificity of three-dimensional hysterosonography versus hysteroscopy, Iran J Reprod Med, 11, 977 Ayida, 1997, Uterine cavity assessment prior to in vitro fertilization: comparison of transvaginal scanning, saline contrast hysterosonography and hysteroscopy, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 10, 59, 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10010059.x Wolman, 1999, Timing of sonohysterography in menstruating women, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 48, 254, 10.1159/000010194 M. Bazot, 2008, Bonne pratique et valeur diagnostique de l’imagerie, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 37, 334, 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74773-2 Jokubkiene, 2014, The appearance of the endometrium at saline contrast sonohysterography in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle: a prospective observational study, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Bingol, 2011, Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy, J Obstet Gynaecol, 31, 54, 10.3109/01443615.2010.532246 El-Sherbiny, 2014, The diagnostic accuracy of two- vs three-dimensional sonohysterography for evaluation of the uterine cavity in the reproductive age, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 22, 127, 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.08.779 Goldstein, 2002, Evaluation of endometrial polyps, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186, 669, 10.1067/mob.2002.122128 Zafarani, 2013, Evaluation of intrauterine structural pathology by three-dimensional sonohysterography using an extended imaging method, Int J Fertil Steril, 7, 1 Salim, 2005, A comparative study of three-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids, Hum Reprod, 20, 253, 10.1093/humrep/deh557 Caliskan, 2010, Diagnostic accuracy of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of congenital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle, J Clin Ultrasound, 38, 123 Woelfer, 2001, Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening, Obstet Gynecol, 98, 1099 Alborzi, 2003, Sonohysterosalpingographic screening for infertile patients, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 82, 57, 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00417-4 Ludwin, 2014, Role of morphologic characteristics of the uterine septum in the prediction and prevention of abnormal healing outcomes after hysteroscopic metroplasty, Hum Reprod, 29, 1420, 10.1093/humrep/deu110 Verma, 2009, Adenomyosis: sonohysterography with MRI correlation, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 192, 1112, 10.2214/AJR.08.1405 Reeves, 2010, Communication of adenomyosis with the endometrial cavity: visualization with saline contrast sonohysterography, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 36, 115, 10.1002/uog.7513 Allahbadia, 1992, Fallopian tubes and ultrasonography: the Sion experience, Fertil Steril, 58, 901, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55432-6 Spalding, 1997, Assessment of tubal patency with transvaginal salpingosonography after treatment for tubal pregnancy, Hum Reprod, 12, 306, 10.1093/humrep/12.2.306 Savaris, 2007, The influence of hydrosalpinx on markers of endometrial receptivity, Semin Reprod Med, 25, 476, 10.1055/s-2007-991045 Panchal, 2014, Imaging techniques for assessment of tubal status, J Hum Reprod Sci, 7, 2, 10.4103/0974-1208.130797 Yaman, 2012, Three-dimensional ultrasound as a predictor of pregnancy in patients undergoing ART, J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 13, 128, 10.5152/jtgga.2012.15 Ng, 2006, Relationship between uterine blood flow and endometrial and subendometrial blood flows during stimulated and natural cycles, Fertil Steril, 85, 721, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.051 Ng, 2006, The role of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, Hum Reprod, 21, 1612, 10.1093/humrep/dei502 Chien, 2002, Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, Fertil Steril, 78, 245, 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03223-5 Jokubkiene, 2006, Assessment of changes in endometrial and subendometrial volume and vascularity during the normal menstrual cycle using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 27, 672, 10.1002/uog.2742 Raine-Fenning, 2004, Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography, Hum Reprod, 19, 330, 10.1093/humrep/deh056 Alcazar, 2006, Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 4, 56, 10.1186/1477-7827-4-56 Chen, 2011, A comparison of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity assessed by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography between healthy fertile women and women with unexplained primary recurrent miscarriage, Fertil Steril, 95, 1127, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.034 Lai, 2014, Endometrial vascularity is lower in pregnancies with pregnancy-induced hypertension or small-for-gestational-age fetus in live birth after in-vitro fertilization, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 44, 455, 10.1002/uog.13309