Recent Trends in Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) - Tập 130 Số 21 - Trang 1876-1882 - 2014
Paul S. Chan1,2,3, Bryan McNally1,2,3, Fengming Tang1,2,3, Arthur L. Kellermann1,2,3
1From Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (P.S.C., F.T.); the Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, and Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (B.M.); and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (A.K.).
2the Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, and Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (B.M.)
3the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (A.K.).

Tóm tắt

Background—

Despite intensive efforts over many years, the United States has made limited progress in improving rates of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Recently, national organizations, such as the American Heart Association, have focused on promoting bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of automated external defibrillators, and other performance improvement efforts.

Methods and Results—

Using the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), a prospective clinical registry, we identified 70 027 U.S. patients who experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between October 2005 and December 2012. Using multilevel Poisson regression, we examined temporal trends in risk-adjusted survival. After adjusting for patient and cardiac arrest characteristics, risk-adjusted rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival increased from 5.7% in the reference period of 2005 to 2006 to 7.2% in 2008 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–1.43; P <0.001). Survival improved more modestly to 8.3% in 2012 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–1.70; P <0.001). This improvement in survival occurred in both shockable and nonshockable arrest rhythms ( P for interaction=0.22) and was also accompanied by better neurological outcomes among survivors ( P for trend=0.01). Improved survival was attributable to both higher rates of prehospital survival, where risk-adjusted rates increased from 14.3% in 2005 to 2006 to 20.8% in 2012 ( P for trend<0.001), and in-hospital survival ( P for trend=0.015). Rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use modestly increased during the study period and partly accounted for prehospital survival trends.

Conclusions—

Data drawn from a large subset of U.S communities suggest that rates of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have improved among sites participating in a performance improvement registry.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1161/circoutcomes.109.889576

10.1056/NEJMoa012689

10.1056/NEJMoa003289

10.1056/NEJMoa040566

10.1056/NEJM200010263431701

10.1161/01.cir.0000087403.24467.a4

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.036

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.018

McNally B, Robb R, Mehta M, Vellano K, Valderrama AL, Yoon PW, Sasson C, Crouch A, Perez AB, Merritt R, Kellermann A; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance—Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005–December 31, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60:1–19.

10.1161/01.cir.0000147236.85306.15

10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5

Goldstein HMultilevel Statistical Models, 3rd Edition. London. Free 2nd Edition: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/examples/msm_goldstein/goldstein.pdf: Arnold Publishers; 2003.

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.008

10.1093/aje/kwh090

10.1093/aje/kwh221

10.1161/circulationaha.112.109496

10.1161/circulationaha.107.734137

10.1001/jama.2013.278483

10.1056/NEJMoa0908993

10.1161/circulationaha.110.970913

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971002