Reasons for Marginal Bone Loss around Oral Implants
Tóm tắt
The reasons for long‐term marginal bone loss around oral implants are not well understood.
The aim of this paper is to analyze presented evidence behind anticipated reasons for long‐term marginal bone loss around oral implants.
A computerized research was conducted on
No evidence was found that primary infection caused marginal bone resorption. Clinical papers that have reported high levels of peri‐implantitis were not supported by data given. Clinical evidence was presented that the so‐called combined factors (implant hardware, clinical handling, and patient characteristics) may lead to marginal bone resorption. However, once tissue damage has been caused by combined factors, inflammation and/or infection may develop secondarily and then result in peri‐implantitis that may need particular clinical treatment.
As marginal bone loss primarily depends on numerous background factors, it seems logical that, for example, the use of poorly constructed implants placed and handled by untrained clinicians may result in high numbers of patients with secondary problems in form of peri‐implantitis; having said this, control of combined factors may likewise lead to very good clinical results where peri‐implantitis would represent a very rare disease indeed even at follow‐up times of 10 years or more.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albrektsson T, 1986, The long‐term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant, 1, 11
Albrektsson T, 1993, Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance, Int J Prosthodont, 6, 95
Chvartszaid D, 2008, Osseointegration – on continuing synergies in surgery, prosthodontics, biomaterials, 157
Bumgardner JD, 2011, Emerging antibacterial biomaterial strategies for the prevention of peri‐implant inflammatory diseases, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 553
Chvartszaid D, 2011, On manufactured diseases, healthy mouths and infected minds, Int J Prosthodont, 24, 102
BolindP.On 606 retrieved oral and craniofacial implants. PhD thesis. Department of Biomaterials University of Göteborg Sweden 2004.
Albrektsson T, 1993, Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology, 365
Klinge B, 2001, Peri‐implant marginal bone loss: an academic controversy or a clinical challenge?, Eur J Oral Implantol, 5, S13
Van Dyke T, 2012, The impact of genotypes and immune reactivity on peri‐implant inflammation: identification and therapeutic use of anti‐inflammatory drugs and immunomodulators, Eur J Oral Implantol, 5, S51
Pettersson K, 2011, Comments on the statistical analysis of the paper by Albouy et al. comparing four different types of implants with respect to spontaneous progression of peri‐implantitis, Eur J Oral Implantol, 4, 9
Esposito M, 2011, Comments on the letter from Kjell Pettersson and Reiner Mengel by the editorial team of EJOI, Eur J Oral Implantol, 4, 11
Todescan FF, 2002, Influence of the microgap in the peri‐implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, 467
Jimbo R, 2011, On marginal bone loss and long‐term controlled oral implant system, Int J Prosthodont
Berglundh T, 1999, Implant dentistry, Proceedings from the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology, 153
Åstrand P, 2008, Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20‐year follow‐up, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 10, 207, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00081.x
Sundén‐PiknerS.Radiographic follow up analysis of Branemark dental implants. PhD thesis University of Göteborg Sweden 2008.
Baldi M, 2009, Plaque accumulation on exposed titanium surfaces and peri‐implant tissue behavior. A preliminary 1‐year clinical study, Int J Prosthodont, 22, 447
Lazzara RJ, 2006, Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 26, 9
Gardner DM, 2005, Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics, N Y State Dent J, 71, 34
Wagenberg B, 2010, Prospective study of 94 platform switched implants observed from 1992 to 2006, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, 9
Canullo L, 2007, Preservation of peri‐implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof‐of‐concept study with 12‐ to 36‐month follow‐up, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, 995
Almeida FD, 2011, Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around internal‐hex implants with switched platform: a clinical case report series, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 587
Vigolo P, 2009, Platform‐switched restorations on wide‐diameter implants: a 5‐year clinical prospective study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, 103
Tabata LF, 2011, Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three‐dimensional finite element analysis, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, 482
Bornstein MM, 2007, Clinical performance of wide‐body implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) surface: results of a 3‐year follow‐up study in a referral clinic, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, 631
Krennmair G, 2010, Clinical outcome of root‐shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5‐year results, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, 357
Carlsson GE, 2000, Long‐term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients, Int J Prosthodont, 13, 295
Nitzan D, 2005, Impact of smoking on marginal bone loss, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, 605
DeLuca S, 2006, The effect of smoking on osseointegrated dental implants. Part II: peri‐implant bone loss, Int J Prosthodont, 19, 560
Sham AS, 2003, The effects of tobacco use on oral health, Hong Kong Med J, 9, 271
Balshe AA, 2008, The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth‐ and rough‐surface dental implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, 1117
Laney WR, 2007, Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implant
Hoshaw SJ, 1994, Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, 345
Miyata T, 2000, The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri‐implant tissue. Part 3: a histologic study in monkeys, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant, 15, 425
Barbier L, 1997, Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, 215
Uribe R, 2004, Marginal periimplantitis due to occlussal overload a case report, Med Oral, 9, 159
Engel E, 2001, Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and periotest value of dental implants, Int J Prosthodont, 14, 444
Vigolo P, 2010, Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change of multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 5‐year prospective study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, 1189
Wolff J, 1892, Das Gesetz der transformation der Knochen
Albrektsson T, 2009, A requiem for the periodontal ligament revisited, Int J Prosthodont, 22, 120
Fu J‐H, 2012, Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants, Eur J Oral Implantol, 5, S91
Malmquist J, 1990, Clinical report on the success of 47 consecutively placed Core‐Vent implants followed from 3 months to 4 years, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, 53
Dietrich U, 1992, Zur Frage des Knochenabbaus bei IMZ‐implantaten, Zeitschr Für Zahnärtzl Implantol, 240
Quirynen M, 1992, Tissue integration in oral orthopaedic and maxillofacial reconstruction, 80
Albrektsson T, 1993, On long‐term maintenance of the osseointegrated response, Aust Prosthodont J, 7, 15
Haas R, 1996, Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, 581
Johnsson BW, 1992, HA‐coated dental implants: long term consequences, J Calif Dent Assoc, 20, 33
Wheeler S, 1996, Eight‐year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma sprayed and hydroxyapatite‐coated cylinder implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, 340
HaugesundByrett 2000 Court Protocol of Norway.2000.
DeBruyn H, 2008, Effect of microthread design on prevention of marginal bone loss, Appl Osseointegrat Res, 7, 38
GlantzP KlingB ÅstrandP.Statements over comments from Nobel Biocare to the Expert report concerning Nobel Direct 2006‐08‐31 Läkemdelsverket Division of Medical Technology Stockholm Sweden 2006 6 pp.
Balshe AA, 2009, A retrospective study of the survival of smooth‐ and rough‐surface dental implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, 1113
BryantSR.Oral implant outcomes predicted by age‐ and site‐specific aspects of bone condition. PhD thesis Department of Prosthodontics University of Toronto Canada 2001.
Pauletto N, 1999, Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implant: a clinical report, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, 865
Gapski R, 2008, Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, 943