Ready for Mobility as a Service? Insights from stakeholders and end-users

Akyelken, 2018, The sustainability of shared mobility in london: the dilemma for governance, Sustainability, 10, 420, 10.3390/su10020420 Becker, 2017, Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles, Transportation, 44, 1293, 10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9 Budapesti Közlekedési Központ, 2011 Caperello, 2014, Engendering the future of electric vehicles: conversations with men and women Cohen, 2016 Cole, 2018 Daniels, 2010 Dempsey, 2008 Eckhardt, J., Aapaoja, A., Nykänen, L., Sochor, J., Karlsson, M., König, D., 2017. Deliverable 2: European MaaS Roadmap 2025. MAASiFiE project funded by CEDR. Fleury, 2017, What drives corporate carsharing acceptance? A French case study, Trans. Res. Part F, 45, 218, 10.1016/j.trf.2016.12.004 Freeman, 1984 Goodall, 2017, The rise of mobility as a service – reshaping how urbanities get around, Deloitte Rev., 20, 112 Guest, 2003, Distinguishing the trees from the forest: applying cluster analysis to thematic qualitative data, Field Methods, 15, 186, 10.1177/1525822X03015002005 Hallock, 2015 Heikkilä, 2014 Hensher, 2017, Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: are they likely to change?, Trans. Res. Part A, 98, 86 Hietanen, 2014, “Mobility as a Service” – the new transport model?, Eurotransport, 12, 2 Hillier, 2015 Ho, 2018, Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): a stated choice study, Trans. Res. Part A, 117, 302 Johansson, M., 2017. Mobility as a Service: Exploring Young People’s Mobility Demands and Travel Behavior (Master’s Thesis). KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Urban Planning and Environment. Jones, 2016, Motives, perceptions and experiences of electric bicycle owners and implications for health, wellbeing and mobility, J. Trans. Geogr., 53, 41, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.006 Kamargianni, 2015 Kamargianni, 2016, A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport, Trans. Res. Procedia, 14, 3294, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277 Kamargianni, 2017, The business ecosystem of Mobility as a Service Kamargianni, 2018 Kamargianni, 2013, Hybrid choice model to investigate effects of teenagers' attitudes toward walking and cycling on mode choice behavior, Trans. Res. Rec.: J. Trans. Res. Board, 2382, 151, 10.3141/2382-17 Karlsson, 2016, Developing the “Service” in Mobility as a Service: experiences from a field trial of an innovative travel brokerage, Trans. Res. Procedia, 14, 3265, 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.273 Kato, 2015, Stakeholders’ perspectives on the feasibility of their cooperation in the carsharing market: evidence from Japan, Asian Trans. Stud., 3, 416 Kennisplatform Verkeer en Vervoer (KpVV), 2014. A New Moment for Carsharing in the Netherlands. Report on 20 February Utrecht Cities Workshop. Kim, 2015, Factors affecting electric vehicle sharing program participants’ attitudes about car ownership and program participation, Trans. Res. Part D, 36, 96, 10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.009 Klein, 2017, Millennials and car ownership: less money, fewer cars, Trans. Policy, 53, 20, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.010 König, D., Eckhardt, J., Aapaoja, A., Sochor, J., Karlsson, M., 2016b. Deliverable 3: Business and operator models for MaaS. MAASiFiE project funded by CEDR. König, 2016, State-of-the-art survey on stakeholders’ expectations for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) Le Vine, 2015, Introduction to special issue: new directions in shared-mobility research, Transportation, 42, 407, 10.1007/s11116-015-9603-4 Macia, 2015, Using clustering as a tool: mixed methods in qualitative data analysis, Qual. Report, 20, 1083 Mote, 2011, The social context of informal commuting: slugs, strangers and structuration, Trans. Res. Part A, 45, 258 NFC Forum, 2011 Petrik, 2018, Are transport users willing to share? Focus groups and stated preferences study on shared mobility Plazier, 2017, The potential for e-biking among the younger population: a study of Dutch students, Travel Behav. Soc., 8, 37, 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.04.007 Polis, 2017. Mobility as a Service: Implications for urban and regional transport. In: Discussion paper offering the perspective of Polis member cities and regions on Mobility as a Service, Brussels, Belgium. Politis, 2017, Designing autonomy in cars: a survey and two focus groups on driving habits of an inclusive user group, and group attitudes towards autonomous cars. Popovich, 2014, Experiences of electric bicycle users in the Sacramento, California area, Travel Behav. Soc., 1, 37, 10.1016/j.tbs.2013.10.006 Prieto, 2017, Car sharing adoption intention in urban areas: what are the key sociodemographic drivers?, Trans. Res. Part A, 10, 218 Sakaria, 2013 Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., 2014. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K. and Australia. Report No. UMTRI-2014-21, The University of Michigan, Michigan, United States. Shaheen, 2016 Shaheen, 2017 Sicari, 2014, Security, privacy and trust in internet of things: the road ahead, Comput. Networks, 146 Smith, 2017, Mobility as a Service: implications for future mainstream public transport Smith, 2018, Mobility as a Service: development scenarios and implications for public transport, Res. Trans. Econ., 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.04.001 Sochor, 2017, A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: a proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals Sochor, J., Eckhardt, J., König, D., Karlsson, M.A., 2016. Future needs and visions for Mobility as a Service: Insights from European workshops. In: 23rd ITS World Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 10–14 October 2016. Transport Systems Catapult, 2016 Zmud, 2017, Towards an understanding of the travel behavior impact of autonomous vehicles, Trans. Res. Procedia, 25, 2500, 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.281