Re-Linking Governance of Energy with Livelihoods and Irrigation in Uttarakhand, India

MDPI AG - Tập 8 Số 10 - Trang 437
Stephanie Buechler1,2, Debashish Sen3, Neha Khandekar3,4, Christopher A. Scott1,2
1School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA
2Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
3People's Science Institute, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand 248006, India
4The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi, Delhi 110003, India

Tóm tắt

Hydropower is often termed “green energy” and proffered as an alternative to polluting coal-generated electricity for burgeoning cities and energy-insecure rural areas. India is the third largest coal producer in the world; it is projected to be the largest coal consumer by 2050. In the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, India, over 450 hydroelectric power schemes are proposed or are under development. Hydropower projects ranging from micro hydro (run-of-the-river systems with generating capacity up to 100 kW) to large reservoirs (storage systems up to 2000 MW) such as the Tehri Dam are in various stages of planning, construction or implementation. Run-of-the-river hydropower projects are being developed in Uttarakhand in order to avoid some of the costs to local communities created by large dams. Stakeholders in this rapid hydropower expansion include multiple actors with often diverging sets of interests. The resulting governance challenges are centered on tradeoffs between local electricity and revenue from the sale of hydropower, on the one hand, and the impacts on small-scale irrigation systems, riparian-corridor ecosystem services, and other natural resource-based livelihoods, on the other. We focus on the Bhilangana river basin, where water dependent livelihoods differentiated by gender include farming, fishing, livestock rearing and fodder collection. We examine the contradictions inherent in hydropower governance based on the interests of local residents and other stakeholders including hydropower developers, urban and other regional electricity users, and state-level policymakers. We use a social justice approach applied to hydropower projects to examine some of the negative impacts, especially by location and gender, of these projects on local communities and then identify strategies that can safeguard or enhance livelihoods of women, youth, and men in areas with hydropower projects, while also maintaining critical ecosystem services. By assessing the Bhilangana basin case, we also offer hydropower–livelihoods–irrigation nexus lessons for headwater regions across the Himalayas and globally.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bharati, L., Smakhtin, V., and Sharma, B.R. (2016). Water Management in the Ganges Basin, Earthscan.

Kumar, 2014, Sustainability indicators for run of the river (RoR) hydropower projects in hydro rich regions of India, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 35, 101, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.048

REN21 Renewables Global Status Report (GSR). Available online: http://www.ren21.net/status-of-renewables/global-status-report/.

Mukherji, 2015, Himalayan waters at the crossroads: Issues and challenges: Editorial, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 31, 151, 10.1080/07900627.2015.1040871

Shah, 2009, Climate change and groundwater: India’s opportunities for mitigation and adaptation, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 035005, 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035005

World Health Organization Ambient (Outdoor) Air Pollution in Cities Database 2014. Available online: http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/AAP_database_results_2014.pdf.

Rasul, G. (2015). Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia. Environ. Dev.

Watershed Management Directorate, Dehra Dun (2010). Uttarakhand State Perspective and Strategic Plan 2009–2027, Available online: http://wmduk.gov.in/Perspective_Plan_2009–2027.pdf.

Joshi, 2015, Women and natural resource management: A study of ‘communities of practice’ prevailing in women farmers’ community management of water and forests of lesser Himalayan region in India, Int. J. Adv. Res., 3, 363

Reddy, 2006, Achieving global environmental benefits through local development of clean energy? The case of small hilly hydel in India, Energy Policy, 34, 4069, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.026

Ministry of Environment and Forests Assessment of Environmental Degradation and Impact of Hydroelectric Projects during the June 2013 Disaster in Uttarakhand, Main Report, MoEF. Available online: http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/environmental%20degradation%20&%20hydroelectric%20projects.pdf.

Dogan, A., Biswas, A., and Tortajada, C. (2012). Impacts of Large Dams: A Global Assessment, Springer.

Asthana, 2012, Forced Displacement: A Gendered Analysis of the Tehri Dam Project in India, Econ. Political Wkly., 47, 96

Khan, 2010, Policy considerations for greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs, Water Altern., 3, 91

Ahlers, 2014, Framing hydropower as green energy: Assessing drivers, risks and tensions in the Eastern Himalayas, Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss., 5, 1521

Postel, 2005, Watershed protection: Capturing the benefits of nature's water supply services, Nat. Resour. Forum, 29, 98, 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00119.x

ESHA The European Small Hydropower Association, 2009. Environmental Barometer on Small Hydro Power. Available online: http://www.esha.be/fileadmin/esha_files/documents/SHERPA/Environmental_Barometer_SHP.pdf.

Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam, Ltd. Personal communication.

Menon, M., and Kohli, K. (2005). Large Dams for Hydropower in Northeast India: A Dossier, SANDRP.

Nüsser, M. (2014). Large Dams in Asia, Springer.

Bhattacharyya, 2012, Energy access programmes and sustainable development: A critical review and analysis, Energy Sustain. Dev., 16, 260, 10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.002

Urpelainen, 2014, Grid and off-grid electrification: An integrated model with applications to India, Energy Sustain. Dev., 19, 66, 10.1016/j.esd.2013.12.008

Zepeda, E., McDonald, S., Panda, M., Kumar, G., and Sapkota, C. Employing India: Guaranteeing jobs for the rural poor. A Report Published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the UNDP. Available online: http://issuu.com/carnegie_endowment/docs/india_rural_employment/1?e=3035200/5270418.

Wolsink, 2007, Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept, Energy Policy, 35, 2683, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001

Chowdhury, 2011, Equity and social justice in water resource governance: The case of Bangladesh, South Asian Water Stud., 2, 44

Young, I.M. (2011). Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press.

Gross, 2007, Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance, Energy Policy, 35, 2727, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013

Buechler, S., and Hanson, A. (2015). A Political Ecology of Women, Water and Global Environmental Change, Routledge.

Rai, K. (2005). Dam Development: The Dynamics of Social Inequality in a Hydropower Project in Nepal, Cuvillier Verlag.

Mathur, H.M. (2013). Displacement and Resettlement in India: The Human Cost of Development, Routledge.

Baviskar, A. (2001). Nancy Peluso and Michael Watts, Cornell University Press.

Asthana, V., and Shukla, A.C. (2014). Water Security in India: Hope, Despair and the Challenges of Human Development, Bloomsbury Publishing.

Mohan, V., and Thakur, P. Make Disaster Study a Must for Uttarakhand Hydel Projects. Available online: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Make-disaster-study-must-for-Uttarakhand-hydel-projects/articleshow/48507584.cms.

Tiwari, 2016, Gender processes in rural out-migration and socio-economic development in the Himalaya, Migr. Dev., 5, 330

Ogra, 2015, Gender and climate change in the Indian Himalayas: Global threats, local vulnerabilities, and livelihood diversification at the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Earth Syst. Dyn., 6, 505, 10.5194/esd-6-505-2015

Baker, 2014, Small hydropower development in Himachal Pradesh. An analysis of socioecological effects, Econ. Political Wkly. (EPW), 49, 21

Huber, 2015, Hydropower, Anti-Politics, and the Opening of New Political Spaces in the Eastern Himalayas, World Dev., 76, 13, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.06.006

2012, Large dams and changes in an agrarian society: Gendering the impacts of Damodar Valley Corporation in eastern India, Water Altern., 5, 529

Asthana, V. Women and Forced Displacement in the Tehri Dam Project. Available online: http://refugeewatchonline.blogspot.com/2011/02/women-and-forced-displacementin-tehri.html.

Baruah, 1999, The Narmada Valley Project: Displacement of local populations and impact on women, Nat. Resour. Forum, 23, 81, 10.1111/j.1477-8947.1999.tb00241.x

Barve, N.S. Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Sardar Sarovar Dam Resettlement. Available online: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3846.

Rangachari, R. (2006). Bhakra-Nangal Project: Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts, Oxford University Press.

Nayak, 2013, Development, Displacement and Justice in India: Study of Hirakud Dam, Soc. Chang., 43, 397, 10.1177/0049085713494299

World Commission on Dams (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making, the Report of the World Commission on Dams, Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Integrated Research and Action for Development (IRADe) (2009). Gender Analysis of Renewable Energy in India: Present Status, Issues, Approaches and New Initiatives, Integrated Research and Action for Development.

Chopra, A.K., and Chakrabarti, P. (1973). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Seismological Society of America.

Bhatia, S. The Danger of Reservoir-Induced Seismicity. Available online: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-openpage/the-danger-of-reservoirinduced-seismicity/article900414.ece.

Down to Earth (1998). Is the Tehri Dam Safe?, Centre for Science and Environment.

South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (2015). Two Years of Uttarakhand Flood Disaster of June 2013: Why is State & Centre Gambling with the Himalayas, the Ganga & Lives of Millions?, South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP).

Chopra, R. Uttarakhand: Development and Ecological Sustainability. Available online: http://www.environmentportal.in/files/file/UttarakhandDevpEcoSustainabiity.pdf.

Shrestha, P., Lord, A., Mukherji, A., Shrestha, R.K., Yadav, L., and Rai, N. (2016). Benefit Sharing and Sustainable Hydropower: Lessons from Nepal, ICIMOD.

Securities Board of Nepal (2010). Securities Registration and Issue Regulations 2008, First Amendment.

Chopra, R. (2012). Hydropower Development in Uttarakhand: A Situation Analysis Report, People’s Science Institute.

Chandra, K.K. Electricity Is a Beginning in the Uplift of Villages and Not the End. Available online: http://www.theweekendleader.com/Causes/1339/beyond-power.html#sthash.yjjCSfG4.dpuf).

Mehta, G.S. (1999). Development of Uttarakhand: Issues and Perspectives, APH Publishing Corporation.

Valdiya, K.S. (2013). Environmental Geology: Ecology, Resource and Hazard Management, McGraw-Hill Education.

Tambe, 2012, Reviving Dying Springs: Climate Change Adaptation Experiments from the Sikkim Himalaya, Mount. Res. Dev., 32, 62, 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00079.1

Molle, F., and Wester, P. (2007). Developing and Managing River Basins: The Need for Adaptive, Multilevel, Collaborative Institutional Arrangements, Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, International Water Management Institute.

Kemper, K., Blomquist, W., and Dinar, A. (2007). Integrated River Basin Management through Decentralization, Springer.

Environment and Gender Index Women’s Participation in Global Environmental Decision Making. Available online: https://portals.iucn.org/union/sites/union/files/doc/egi_factsheet_desicion_making_web_sept2015.pdf.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

MDPI AG

Tập 8 Số 10

437

Thông tin tác giả