Rats’ choices between one and two delayed reinforcers
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Davison, M. C. (1969). Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 247–252.
Duncan, B., &Fantino, E. (1970). Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,14, 73–86.
Green, L., Fry, A. F., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.
Killeen, P. (1968). On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 263–270.
Loewenstein, G., &Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.),Choice over time (pp. 119–146). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Mazur, J. E. (1984). Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 426–436.
Mazur, J. E. (1986). Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,46, 67–77.
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mazur, J. E. (1989). Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,51, 87–99.
Mazur, J. E. (2000). Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement.Behavioural Processes,49, 1–10.
Mazur, J. E., &Romano, A. (1992). Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: Effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,58, 513–525.
McDiarmid, C. G., &Rilling, M. E. (1965). Reinforcement delay and reinforcement rate as determinants of schedule preference.Psychonomic Science,2, 195–196.
Moore, J. (1979). Choice and number of reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,,32, 51–63.
Moore, J. (1982). Choice and multiple reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,37, 115–122.
Myerson, J., &Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,64, 263–276.
Ohmura, Y., Takahashi, T., Kitamura, N., &Wehr, P. (2006). Threemonth stability of delay and probability discounting measures.Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology,14, 318–328.
Rachlin, H. (2006). Notes on discounting.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,85, 425–435.
Richards, J. B., Mitchell, S. H., de Wit, H., &Seiden, L. S. (1997). Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,67, 353–366.
Rodriguez, M. L., &Logue, A. W. (1988). Adjusting delay to reinforcement: Comparing choice in pigeons and humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 105–117.
Shull, R. L., &Spear, D. J. (1987). Detention time after reinforcement: Effects due to delay of reinforcement? In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 187–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.