Ranking research institutions by the number of highly-cited articles per scientist

Journal of Informetrics - Tập 9 - Trang 915-923 - 2015
Giovanni Abramo1, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo2
1Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI-CNR), National Research Council of Italy, Via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Rome, Italy
2Department of Engineering and Management, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abramo, 2009, Mapping excellence in national research systems: The case of Italy, Evaluation Review, 33, 159, 10.1177/0193841X08322871 Abramo, 2011, Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?, Scientometrics, 88, 915, 10.1007/s11192-011-0426-6 Abramo, 2012, Revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity, Higher Education, 63, 701, 10.1007/s10734-011-9471-6 Abramo, 2012, What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?, Scientometrics, 93, 1005, 10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9 Abramo, 2012, A sensitivity analysis of researchers’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 192, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.12.003 Abramo, 2012, Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 470, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.03.005 Abramo, 2013, The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 198, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.003 Abramo, 2014, Are the authors of highly-cited articles also the most productive ones?, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 89, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.011 Abramo, 2014, Inefficiency in selecting products for submission to national research assessment exercises, Scientometrics, 98, 2069, 10.1007/s11192-013-1177-3 Abramo, 2014, Investigating returns to scope of research fields in universities, Higher Education, 68, 69, 10.1007/s10734-013-9685-x Abramo, 2014, How do you define and measure research productivity?, Scientometrics, 101, 1129, 10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8 Bonaccorsi, 2005, Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity, Scientometrics, 63, 87, 10.1007/s11192-005-0205-3 Bornmann, 2011, Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1954, 10.1002/asi.21611 Bornmann, 2012, The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 333, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.006 Butler, 2007, Assessing university research: A plea for a balanced approach, Science and Public Policy, 34, 565, 10.3152/030234207X254404 Cho, 2012, Citation rates for experimental psychology articles published between 1950 and 2004: Top-cited articles in behavioral cognitive psychology, Memory & Cognition, 40, 1132, 10.3758/s13421-012-0214-4 D’Angelo, 2011, A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 257, 10.1002/asi.21460 Garfield, 1979, Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?, Scientometrics, 1, 359, 10.1007/BF02019306 Golden, 1992, Academic research productivity, department size and organization: Further results, comment, Economics of Education Review, 11, 169, 10.1016/0272-7757(92)90007-P Hennessey, 2009, The top 100 cited articles in urology, Canadian Urological Association Journal, 3, 293, 10.5489/cuaj.1123 Khan, 2012, Top-cited articles in environmental sciences: Merits and demerits of citation analysis, Science of the Total Environment, 431, 122, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.035 Moed, 1985, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance, Research Policy, 14, 131, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5 Moed, 2005 Pontille, 2004, 2004 RIN (Research Information Network), 2009 Seglen, 2000, Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research, Scientometrics, 49, 123, 10.1023/A:1005665309719 Shapiro, 1991, The most-cited articles from the Yale Law Journal, Yale Law Journal, 100, 1449, 10.2307/796696 Tijssen, 2003, Scoreboards of research excellence, Research Evaluation, 12, 91, 10.3152/147154403781776690 Waltman, 2012, The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2419, 10.1002/asi.22708 Wang, 2013, Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation, Scientometrics, 94, 851, 10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9 Zitt, 2005, Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation, Scientometrics, 63, 373, 10.1007/s11192-005-0218-y